https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Mar 25 17:38:17 2017
New Revision: 246476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-25 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/80156
PR fortran/7938
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Can this be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 20 10:52:50 2017
New Revision: 245596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-16 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79382
* decl.c (access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #7 from Walt Brainerd ---
With GENERIC and PUBLIC statements
ifort says "No visible interface"
gfortran gets an ICE
So I assume the code is wrong, as you suggest, but both give funny
messages
With the other "bug" I filed: pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #6 from Walt Brainerd ---
You are probably right, but I have done all this on my home computer,
so I need to look at things again this evening. I do have ifort there and
will let you know.
I was trying all kinds of variations and can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Walt,
My reading of the situation is that since, in this version, the
generic procedure is typebound in a public derived type, the PUBLIC
attribute is already accorded it. I thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #4 from Walt Brainerd ---
Sorry, I forgot to remove the extraneous USE statement
which cutting down from the original code.
I am not good with this new stuff; please explain what
the syntax error is? If the PUBLIC statement is not co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The test compiles and executes if I remove the line
>
>public :: write (formatted)
Hi Walt and Dominique,
Should this be a syntax error or a quiet ign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The test compiles and executes if I remove the line
public :: write (formatted)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
11 matches
Mail list logo
