https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Walt, My reading of the situation is that since, in this version, the generic procedure is typebound in a public derived type, the PUBLIC attribute is already accorded it..... I think! Do you have access to a recent copy of ifort? Mine is on my workstation, which is still in storage after a house move. I would be curious to know how it responds to both the typebound and the explicit generic interface versions. Best regards Paul On 6 February 2017 at 17:50, walt.brainerd at gmail dot com <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 > > --- Comment #4 from Walt Brainerd <walt.brainerd at gmail dot com> --- > Sorry, I forgot to remove the extraneous USE statement > which cutting down from the original code. > > I am not good with this new stuff; please explain what > the syntax error is? If the PUBLIC statement is not correct, > how do you make the write(formatted) interface public? > > Thanks for looking at this so quickly. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
