--- Comment #5 from christoph dot wintersteiger at inf dot ethz dot ch
2007-04-26 16:03 ---
Subject: Re: no warning on implicit cast from int to pointer
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 14:56 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 15:56 ---
>Thanks for clarifying. I still think it's completely confusing to have
> a[b]==b[a] in general, but that's probably something that can't be changed
> easily.
Well, this is what the C standard says how this is defin
--- Comment #3 from christoph dot wintersteiger at inf dot ethz dot ch
2007-04-26 12:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> There is no implicit cast here. a[b] is the same as (*((a)+(b))), and since
> addition is commutative, this is the same as (b)[a].
>
Thanks for clarifying. I still t
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-04-26 12:18 ---
There is no implicit cast here. a[b] is the same as (*((a)+(b))), and since
addition is commutative, this is the same as (b)[a].
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from christoph dot wintersteiger at inf dot ethz dot ch
2007-04-26 12:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=13448)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13448&action=view)
Testcase, should produce a warning but doesn't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
