------- Comment #5 from christoph dot wintersteiger at inf dot ethz dot ch 2007-04-26 16:03 ------- Subject: Re: no warning on implicit cast from int to pointer
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 14:56 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > ------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 15:56 > ------- > >Thanks for clarifying. I still think it's completely confusing to have > > a[b]==b[a] in general, but that's probably something that can't be changed > > easily. > > Well, this is what the C standard says how this is defined. C++ on the other > hand, is different. > > Yep, you're right, the standard says that. The C++ standard says the same for standard-[] (c-type arrays, I guess not for custom operator[]s in classes). Christoph -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31712
