http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-09
18:18:56 UTC ---
you don't even need the partial specialization of Befriender:
template class A;
template&> class A;
template
struct Befriender {
typedef B&> type;
};
template class A
{
frien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-09
18:07:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The reason that I did not succeed in making ClassB a friend of ClassA is that
> C++ is not very logical.
Maybe so, but that's not a bug in GCC.
The nex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #13 from Michiel 2010-10-09 13:38:05
UTC ---
The reason that I did not succeed in making ClassB a friend of ClassA is that
C++ is not very logical. See below.
template class classB;
template class classC;
template class classA
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #12 from Michiel 2010-10-09 13:02:51
UTC ---
> You seem to misunderstand what this bugzilla is for.
No, that is not true, although the effect has been equally terrible. Indeed,
you only need to say that my bug is invalid.
However,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #11 from Michiel 2010-10-08 16:09:33
UTC ---
C++ is designed to give an error message which is syntactically correct, but
semantically incorrect.
I thought that the template prechecker (preprocessor or whatever, do not
correct me thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-08
15:59:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> I really tried everything, but I have to admit I missed that one. Sorry. But
> you have to admit that it is a rather unnatural way to make friends.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #9 from Michiel 2010-10-08 15:43:13 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > This code is not valid, G++ is correct to reject it.
> >
> > Please explain why the code is invalid, a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-08
15:36:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Apparently you are making the same mistake as the compiler.
> >
> > Before adjusting the sente
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #7 from Michiel 2010-10-08 15:12:36 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Apparently you are making the same mistake as the compiler.
>
> Before adjusting the sentence to use a proper plural here (the same e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-08
15:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > This code is not valid, G++ is correct to reject it.
>
> Please explain why the code is invalid, and do not click "Resolved i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Michiel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #3 from Michiel 2010-10-08 14:51:36 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's not entirely clear what you're saying is a bug, because your testcase
> doesn't give any error.
>
> It's more helpful to provide the source code that you cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-08
14:41:28 UTC ---
It's not entirely clear what you're saying is a bug, because your testcase
doesn't give any error.
It's more helpful to provide the source code that you claim produces the bug.
I a
15 matches
Mail list logo
