subject:"\[Bug bootstrap\/46397\] lto\-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10\/SPARC"

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-11 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-11 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #17 from Dave Korn 2010-11-11 13:34:04 UTC --- Author: davek Date: Thu Nov 11 13:33:59 2010 New Revision: 166601 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166601 Log: PR bootstrap/46397 PR bootstrap/46362 * co

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-11 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-10 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #15 from Dave Korn 2010-11-10 15:39:53 UTC --- Thanks for testing!

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-10 Thread gseanmcg at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #14 from Sean McGovern 2010-11-10 12:27:39 UTC --- Succcessfully bootstrapped with the attached patch.

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-09 22:17:31 UTC --- > I hope the respin will render this moot. Right, our mails crossed :-) Thanks. Rainer

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 22:08:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > > --- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 > > 21:21:07 UTC --- > > > I would expect so, but haven't audited the code. Of course, we *have* a c99 > > compi

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-09 22:06:57 UTC --- > --- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 21:21:07 > UTC --- > I would expect so, but haven't audited the code. Of course, we *have* a c99 > compiler availabl

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22355|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 21:35:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > How about if we make building the plugin conditional on having c99 > > available? > > That wouldn't be consistent with us currently requiring only a C90 comp

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-09 21:31:59 UTC --- > I would expect so, but haven't audited the code. Of course, we *have* a c99 > compiler available after stage 1; is there a way to disable lto-plugin just > during stage1/non-bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 21:21:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > How about if we make building the plugin conditional on having c99 > > available? > > That wouldn't be consistent with us currently requiring only a C90 comp

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 21:03:50 UTC --- > (Don't forget to regenerate the two configure files, And run autoheader in lto-plugin, I should have added there.

[Bug bootstrap/46397] lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC

2010-11-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397 --- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2010-11-09 21:00:57 UTC --- Created attachment 22355 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22355 first spin of trial patch How about if we make building the plugin conditional on having c99 available?