http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn <davek at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-09 21:21:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > How about if we make building the plugin conditional on having c99 > > available? > > That wouldn't be consistent with us currently requiring only a C90 compiler to > build GCC. Can't the code be rewritten in C90 instead? I would expect so, but haven't audited the code. Of course, we *have* a c99 compiler available after stage 1; is there a way to disable lto-plugin just during stage1/non-bootstrap builds?
