[Bug c++/29045] gcc fails to compile code with operator delete(void*,size_t)

2006-09-12 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #2 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-09-12 22:30 --- Created an attachment (id=12237) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12237&action=view) preprocessed source Here is the preprocessed source. Here's the error: backports:/afs/ir/src/pubsw

[Bug c++/29045] New: gcc fails to compile code with operator delete(void*,size_t)

2006-09-12 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
delete(void*,size_t) Product: gcc Version: 4.0.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: quanah at stanford dot edu GCC build triplet

[Bug c++/27935] gcc fails to compile code with operator delete(void*,size_t)

2006-08-20 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #10 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-08-21 06:28 --- MySQL compiles fine with gcc3.3 and gcc3.4, so this is definately a problem in 4.0.3 itself. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27935

[Bug c++/27935] gcc fails to compile code with operator delete(void*,size_t)

2006-08-20 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #9 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-08-21 05:17 --- I am hitting this bug in gcc 4.0.3, trying to compile MySQL 5.0.19 and 5.0.24. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27935

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-08-15 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #44 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-08-15 18:23 --- This entire problem stems from having: --enable-thread-safe when building MPFR on Solaris. I finally got gcc 4.0.3 to build gfortran for me last week after fixing that configure line to MPFR. -- http

[Bug libfortran/26893] kinds.h not generated, causing failure

2006-05-19 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #7 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-05-19 17:09 --- I will be working on this after the students leave, starting in June. Please keep this ticket open. I note that the versions of GMP & MPFR I'm using work *fine* on linux, so I consider them "known goo

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-05-19 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #42 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-05-19 17:09 --- I will be working on this after the students leave, starting in June. Please keep this ticket open. I note that the versions of GMP & MPFR I'm using work *fine* on linux, so I consider them "known goo

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-03-30 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #38 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 21:18 --- Yeah, I'll give that a shot next week (i'm now in a freeze period). I've also been poking at MPFR. There are apparently 10 or more patches now for 2.2.0, that may resolve the issues, too. I'll

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-03-30 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #36 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:48 --- Just to note, if I haven't already, I was able to build gcc 4.0.3 with GMP 4.2 and MPFR 2.2.0 on i386 and amd64 without a problem (including fortran), so this seems to be a problem specific to Solaris 8/9. --

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-03-30 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #35 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:40 --- >From the GMP 4.2 NEWS file: Mis-features: * mpfr is gone, and will from now on be released only separately. Please see www.mpfr.org. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-03-30 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #33 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:17 --- GDB shows: GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-03-30 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #32 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:10 --- Okay, I created the following file (as is generated by the script): solaris8-build:/tmp> cat /tmp/q1.f90 integer (kind=1) :: x end Then ran the build command on it as is done by the script: /afs/ir.stanford.

[Bug libfortran/26889] selected_int_kind.inc broken, causing failure

2006-03-30 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #30 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 16:48 --- Here is what happens when I run it by hand: solaris8-build:/afs/ir/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libgfortran> /bin/ksh ../../../../gcc-4.0.3/libgfortran/mk-sik-inc.sh &#

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails

2006-03-29 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #28 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-29 22:12 --- Created an attachment (id=11160) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11160&action=view) selected_int_kind.inc Here's the selected_int_kind.inc file generated on Solaris 8 with gcc 4.0.3.

[Bug libfortran/26893] kinds.h not generated, causing failure

2006-03-29 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #5 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-29 21:49 --- Yep. That's how f951 was getting linked to gmp. I'm going to make gmp only be static, however, and see if that changes things. I'm going to have to defer further work on both these bugs until next week

[Bug libfortran/26893] kinds.h not generated, causing failure

2006-03-29 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #3 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-29 18:45 --- Actually, the problem has nothing to do with using /bin/sh, because I get the same failure using /bin/ksh, too: /bin/ksh ../../../../gcc-4.1.0/libgfortran/mk-srk-inc.sh '/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/language

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails

2006-03-28 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #27 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-29 01:47 --- I'll try the flags and get the attachment to you tomorrow. Today is my birthday, and my wife doesn't really want me on the computer much. ;) So far, gcc 4.1.0 looks to be building without issue.

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails

2006-03-28 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #24 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 20:59 --- I will look at removing the libintl/libiconv bits, but in the past gcc failed to find them without adding those flags. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails

2006-03-28 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #23 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 20:59 --- Created an attachment (id=11144) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11144&action=view) selected_int_kind.f90 selected_int_kind.f90 (it is just what is shipped with the gcc-4.0.3

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails

2006-03-28 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #22 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 20:56 --- I can look at only building GMP static, rather than static & shared. I have a build of 4.1 happening on Solaris 9 at the moment after fixing the ksh issue. --Quanah -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-28 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #18 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 19:23 --- Unsuprisingly,the build still fails after changing it to use "make boostrap" in the same exact way: /afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/gfortran -B/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #16 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 07:33 --- I will try "make bootstrap", but I note: "make" worked fine with gcc-3.4.x, gcc-3.3.x, gcc-2.9x etc. And for i386 and amd64 it worked just fine, too, for gcc 4.0.3 with these same versions of G

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #14 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 07:26 --- For building GCC, I execute: cd ../gcc-build/@sys && make CFLAGS='-O' \ LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' 2>&1 | tee -a makeLOG (@sys

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #12 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 07:21 --- For GMP (4.1.4 and 4.2, I've tried both versions): This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. It was created by configure, whic

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #10 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 01:59 --- I rebuilt gmp with: --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.8 and then rebuilt MPFR, and then rebuilt gcc 4.0.3. On Solaris 8, it is still dying, with: /afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc

[Bug libfortran/26893] kinds.h not generated, causing failure

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #2 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 22:28 --- ah, thanks. Never hit that issue with any gcc release until now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26893

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #8 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 22:27 --- sorry, I meant 4.1.0, and you answered that well enough. ;) *how* do I build gmp/mpfr without TLS? I don't see any configure options that make sense for this... I'll note that GMP was built with ABI=32

[Bug libfortran/26893] New: kinds.h not generated, causing failure

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: quanah at stanford dot edu GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26893

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #6 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 22:09 --- I don't see a way to disable "TLS" support in GMP or MPFR, but I'll keep poking. I didn't build gcc 4.0.2 with Fortran support because I needed to build gcc to build GMP and MPFR. ;) Building

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #4 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 20:48 --- Disable TLS support in *which* library? GMP, MPFR, or libfortran? There are no options in the configure for GMP or MPFR referring to TLS/SSL. --Quanah -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #2 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 19:23 --- On Solaris 8, the build fails also, except with the following error: /afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/gfortran -B/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/ -B/usr

[Bug fortran/26889] libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #1 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 17:23 --- change to fortran, instead of libfortran. -- quanah at stanford dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/26889] New: libfortran build fails with: object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize

2006-03-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
igned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: quanah at stanford dot edu GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889

[Bug java/26437] java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-03-13 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #7 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-14 03:28 --- gcc 4.0.3 builds for me without issue on the AMD 64, so the issue I hit must have been something fixed between 4.0.2 and 4.0.3. This can be closed. --Quanah -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26437

[Bug libstdc++/5291] Bad reference to build directory in libstdc++.la

2006-02-27 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #14 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-27 22:19 --- I've tried the patch suggested in this bug. However, I found that it does *not* fix all the issues. For example, here is the result of my libstdc++.la file with the patch applied: # Libraries that this one de

[Bug java/26437] java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-02-26 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #6 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-27 03:46 --- What version of binutils would you recommend I try? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26437

[Bug java/26437] java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-02-24 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #4 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-25 00:59 --- Setting the PIC flags did not fix this issue. It appears impossible at this time to build gcj on AMD64 with 4.0.x. --Quanah -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26437

[Bug java/26437] java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-02-24 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #3 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-24 23:24 --- This may be in part because two variables are not being set correctly: "PICFLAG=" "PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET=" when building in libjava/ --Quanah -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26437

[Bug java/26437] java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-02-24 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #2 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-24 23:09 --- This seems to be because libsax_gcj_la-sax.o is not being built with -fPIC, like it apparently needs to be: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/afs/ir/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/amd64_linux26/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava

[Bug java/26437] java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-02-22 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Comment #1 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-02-23 01:25 --- Oh, and here are my configure options: configure '--datadir=${prefix}/lib' '--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib' '--sharedstatedir=${prefix}/lib' --prefix=/usr/pubsw --enable-threads --wi th-gnu-

[Bug java/26437] New: java build fails with relocation R_X86_64_32 error

2006-02-22 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
ED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: quanah at stanford dot edu GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x

[Bug libstdc++/19995] libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2

2005-02-16 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-17 05:24 --- using config-ml.in from gcc-3.3.1 also didn't resolve the problem. I can only assume the problem lies elsewhere. Any ideas? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19995

[Bug libstdc++/19995] libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2

2005-02-16 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-17 00:51 --- Also note that my case differs from 18033 because I'm *not* setting: --disable-aix64 (--enable-aix64=no) My configure options worked fine with gcc-3.3.1. I'm currently testing using the config-

[Bug libstdc++/19995] libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2

2005-02-16 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 21:34 --- The patch listed in bug 18033 does *not* fix the problem. After applying the patch, and regenerating the top level configure via autoconf (just to be safe), I still have the exact same bootstrapping problem

[Bug bootstrap/18033] [3.4/4.0 Regression] --disable-aix64 doesn't remove ppc64 from multilib list

2005-02-16 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 17:02 --- *** Bug 19995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18033

[Bug libstdc++/19995] libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2

2005-02-16 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 17:02 --- never mind, i forgot to run autoconf to regenerate configure after applying the patch. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18033 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/19995] libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2

2005-02-16 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 16:28 --- I disagree that this is a duplicate of 18033. I applied the following patch to gcc-3.4.3: --- gcc-3.4.3/config-ml.in.orig 2005-02-15 21:37:41.0 -0800 +++ gcc-3.4.3/config-ml.in 2005-02-15 21:38

[Bug libstdc++/19995] New: libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2

2005-02-15 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
nfig.log' for more details. -- Summary: libstdc++ fails to build correctly on AIX 5.2 Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unas

[Bug libstdc++/19962] local dependencies permeated throughout other libraries instead of for $prefix/lib

2005-02-14 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-15 01:00 --- To note, I'm using libtool 1.5.8 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19962

[Bug libstdc++/19962] New: local dependencies permeated throughout other libraries instead of for $prefix/lib

2005-02-14 Thread quanah at stanford dot edu
Summary: local dependencies permeated throughout other libraries instead of for $prefix/lib Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unas