This option should just be removed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:21 AM, "amodra at bigpond dot net dot au" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-06-17
09:21 ---
See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10231
--
http://gcc.g
Both of these are undefined. Look up about sequence point rules.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2009, at 12:15 AM, "ashutosh dot sharma dot 0204 at gmail
dot com" wrote:
Compiler Version:
gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free
Looks like this failson non elf hosts (well darwin supports dlopen so
I don't understand why it fails on darwin).
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2009, at 10:19 AM, "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" > wrote:
Yet another bootstrap error on i686-apple-darwin9:
...
/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gc
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 26, 2009, at 11:54 PM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27
06:54 ---
This doesn't look like a GCC bug, but user error.
It is a gcc bug as this dependency is not documented this way. At
Gcc 4.4 and above supports different target options on the function
level but not on a basic block level. So you can create an interneral
version for AVX.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:37 PM, "drepper at redhat dot com" > wrote:
--- Comment #2 from drepper at redhat dot
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 13, 2009, at 7:43 AM, "gcc at abeckmann dot de" > wrote:
This is a 4.5.0 regression on invalid code:
== 8< ==
template < typename >
struct A
{
A < struct
{
f () :
== >8 ==
-- 4.5.0 --
$ x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-trunk -v
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:38 AM, "jk500500 at yahoo dot com" > wrote:
The attached test program -- which I extracted and simplified from the
'176.gcc'
SPEC2000 benchmark -- is compiled incorrectly at -O2 and -O3. The
code is
correct at -O1 and -O0.
The bad code I am rep
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2009, at 7:05 AM, "joel dot porquet at gmail dot com" > wrote:
Mips ABI specifies to let the space for 4 arguments in stack when
calling a
function. This is not respected when accessing tls variable with a
dynamic
model: gcc implicitely calls __get_tls_addr
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2009, at 1:15 AM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-16
08:15 ---
Reduced testcase:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fprefetch-loop-arrays" } */
void
foo (char *x, unsign
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 15, 2009, at 2:02 PM, "doko at ubuntu dot com" > wrote:
The shared library libgfortran.so.3 in 4.3.x has the
__iso_c_binding_c_f_procpoin...@gfortran_1.0 symbol exported. This
symbol is
missing in 4.4.0 20090315.
I think this symbol was never used (from the fo
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2009, at 8:54 PM, "rob1weld at aol dot com" > wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-03-14 03:54
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Subject: Re: New: The Driver hides "undefined reference" messages
from
shared libs (but not object
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:11 PM, "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu"
wrote:
There are a number of aliasing warnings coming out of tree-ssa-
structalias.c
when compiling code in pymol which uses their endianswap.h header at
-O3 -Wall.
The warnings are of the form..
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:27 PM, "rob1weld at aol dot com" > wrote:
The Driver hides "undefined reference" messages from shared libs but
not from object files. This seems inconsistent and is not helpful.
Why do you think the driver is doing instead of the linker?
When co
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-09
15:40 ---
I think this is more likely a C++ frontend issue. At least I cannot
believe
this behavior is mandated by the std
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:36 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-09
15:36 ---
You need to specify that the registers are clobbered by the asm.
The only
way to do that is to use output constrai
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2009, at 1:28 PM, "skunk at iskunk dot org" > wrote:
Bootstrapping gcc-4.4-20090306(.tar.bz2) on Tru64 fails with
This is a snapshot so it does not have all of generated files that a
release will have. So this bug is invalid.
flex -ogengtype-lex.c /tmp
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2009, at 8:30 PM, "galtgendo at o2 dot pl" > wrote:
--- Comment #16 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-03-07 04:30
---
OK, I've done a little test and I'd like to know,
if it's results actually mean anything:
I've compiled freeciv with CFLAGS="-O2 -f
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:43 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25
09:43 ---
Is there a reason the Fortran frontend gives function local
variables static
storage duration?
Yes, it is larg
This is mostly likely due to my no micro code patch. I see what causes
it tommorow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:55 PM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc" { target { powerpc
Yes this known I forgot the bug number but try with -fabi-version=0.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2009, at 2:07 PM, "dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
Given the following code:
template struct X { };
int f(int, int) { }
void g(X) { }
GCC produces the mangled name:
_Z1g1XILZ1fi
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:56 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 13:56
---
ping?
The patch was just approved last night and I will be applying it when
I get into work today.
--
bonzini at gnu dot
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:33 PM, "tony_eckert at umsl dot edu" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from tony_eckert at umsl dot edu 2009-02-03
04:33 ---
appears similar to bug 37865, but without --enable-intermodule.
Only departure from defaults is --prefix
Are you buildin
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 6:00 PM, "tydeman at tybor dot com" > wrote:
Using gcc 4.3.2-7 on Intel Pentium 4 running Linux Fedora Core 10 and
-std=gnu99
There were some dfp fixes on the trunk relating to fp exceptions so
you should try the trunk before reporting any more bug
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29
10:01 ---
The best option would be to revert that patch on the branch.
Except it alone could not cause wrong code. Some ot
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:15 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" > wrote:
This testcase fails:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
int f(int *p)
{
int a = *p;
int *q = (int *)0xDEADBEE0;
*q = 5;
return *p == a;
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:02 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-01-27 11:02
---
This simple patch is not enough:
Index: tree-ssa-structalias.c
===
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2009, at 2:24 PM, "jellegeerts at gmail dot com" > wrote:
--- Comment #6 from jellegeerts at gmail dot com 2009-01-24
22:24 ---
Seems reasonable, though I'd vote for -Wall to include -Winit-self.
I actually discovered this because of a bug I foun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 8:34 PM, "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" > wrote:
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-23
04:34 ---
How about this one:
---
extern void abort (void);
void
foo (int x)
{
if (x != 8)
abort ();
}
void
bar (int g
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:54 PM, "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" > wrote:
On x86, CX is used for shift. If CX is used for a variable, it
may not be preserved with shift:
[...@gnu-9 reg-1]$ cat r.c
extern void abort (void);
void
foo (int x)
{
if (x != 8)
abort ();
}
vo
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:00 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-01-22 09:00
---
In PRE there is a fold_convert_const_int_from_int call simplifying
"(signed
char) 249" to -7, but setting the TREE_OVERFLOW flag
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:57 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16
09:57 ---
I think this boils down to the usual POINTER_PLUS fallout.
It failed in 4.1 also so nope :).
--
http://gcc
On Jan 13, 2009, at 8:03 AM, "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
I originally found this problem when trying to compile a Java
package written
by the Universität Stuttgart's institute IKR. I was using Debian's
gcj
package, version 4.3.2-2, but can likewise reproduce this using SVN
On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:08 AM, "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" > wrote:
Found at:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/0f1d7da66fa015c2
print *, (-2.0)**2.0
end
is invalid. gfortran should print a diagnostic for -std=f95/f2003/
f2008 as NAG
f95 does:
Error: N
On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:59 PM, "rob1weld at aol dot com" > wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-10 23:59
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Is this still true in newer GCC releases? Also this was removed in
4.3 and
above.
Yes, on trunk. Searching for dupe befor
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:22 AM, "pluto at agmk dot net" > wrote:
following code snipet is reducted testcase from external application.
g++ and comeau online accept/reject source differently.
template < class T >
struct A
{
};
template < class U >
struct B
{
#if 1
typedef A< float > A; // <
On Jan 8, 2009, at 9:44 AM, "tim at klingt dot org" > wrote:
--- Comment #1 from tim at klingt dot org 2009-01-08 17:44
---
Created an attachment (id=17057)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17057&action=view)
proposed patch
This patch is incorrect as -fsched
Well template here might be consider the keyword template. So we
either have template argument or just argument. Translating template
might cause more confusion.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 7, 2009, at 1:34 PM, "goeran at uddeborg dot se" > wrote:
In gcc/cp/parser.c there is this code in
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:44 PM, "gnu at bluedreamer dot com" > wrote:
When a pointer to type is typedef'ed to a new type gcc incorrectly
warns about
const modifier if new typedef is used in function return type.
gcc info:
dluadrianc:/home/adrianc> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-
On Jan 5, 2009, at 7:01 PM, "rob1weld at aol dot com" > wrote:
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 03:01
---
(In reply to comment #3)
And this is documented in the installation documentation.
(Confusion may also result if the compiler finds the GNU assembler
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:33 PM, "whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu" > wrote:
--- Comment #15 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2008-12-15
21:32 ---
GCC chose to change the *unwritten* standard for the ABI in use for
IA32 GNU/Linux.
This is not true. Prior to t
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:51 AM, "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10
10:51 ---
Investigating.
There is no reason to investigate. The reason why this change
happened was bec
I think this bug is invalid since the type can change via a placement
new which will change the vtable.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:09 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30
12:09
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2008, at 7:42 AM, "thomas at mich dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #20 from thomas at mich dot com 2008-11-22 15:42
---
There minimally needs to be a way of turning this warning off in GCC.
GCC should not be trying to micromanage
I don't think INF is the same as infinity. It is most like implict
declared variable with an undefined value.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:52 PM, "dojo at masterleep dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I am getting unreliable results from a small function using the latest
pr
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:59 PM, "edwintorok at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #2 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-11-15
21:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Subject: Re: New: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap
Sen
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:27 PM, "edwintorok at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I tried to build a gcc 4.4.0 with --enable-checking=all but it timed
out:
Since --enable-checking=all enables gc all the time then yes
It will take a long time. Maybe even days. Mar
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:05 AM, "dominique dot pelle at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Vim (at least current version vim-7.2.40) crashes on start up when
compiled
with optimization option -O3 using gcc-4.3.2 (that's the default
version that
comes with Ubuntu
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:01 PM, "mvanier at cs dot caltech dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #10 from mvanier at cs dot caltech dot edu
2008-11-15 01:01 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Is "." in your PATH environment varia
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:05 AM, "efinger at us dot ibm dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #4 from efinger at us dot ibm dot com 2008-11-14
17:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
There are going to be other holes in structs in general due to
alignme
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:11 PM, "d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
tree.c:
tree
decl_value_expr_lookup (tree from)
{
...
return NULL_TREE;
}
tree.h:
#define DECL_VALUE_EXPR(NODE) \
(decl_value_expr_lookup (DECL_WRTL_CHECK (NODE)))
db
Hmm, shouldn't the preprocessor just mark the include as a duplicate?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:50 AM, "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
You can also just do -Dineednopchreallyidont :).
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2008, at 8:23 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
There is no option to turn off the use of precompiled headers. This
makes
generating preprocessed source for bugs harder than necess
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:53 AM, "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-02
12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
This is my current patch and it works in this testcase. However,
it also
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 29, 2008, at 12:17 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-10-29 07:17
---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] IRA generates slower
code for -mtune=core2
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrot
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 19, 2008, at 7:39 AM, "bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #1 from bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk
2008-10-19 14:39 ---
I'm really sorry - requesting the form after network problems
apparently
submit
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:42 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16
09:42 ---
The fma patterns on ia64 are not guarded properly. They should be off
as long as flag_unsafe_m
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2008, at 9:10 AM, "Ralovich, Kristóf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m> wrote:
Hi GCC developers,
I have a c++ source, that I think is wrong (wrt the c++ standard), but
accepted by g++ (and msvc too)!
int
main(int argc, char** a
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2008, at 5:28 AM, "therealfroggey at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
GCC versions used:
gcc version 4.1.2
gcc version 4.4.0 20081011 (experimental) (GCC) svn revision 141055
Command line used: g++ -Wall -Wextra bug.cc
The following code should fail
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, "carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #1 from carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08
16:48 ---
Here's another one:
This expected behaviour of this option. It was not designed for users
really
Iirc there are some pod vs non pod issues here dealing wit padding and
the c++ standard and not even the abi.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 7, 2008, at 2:31 AM, "david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #3 from david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 6, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I use gcc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr --
with-local-prefix=/usr/local --infodir=/usr/
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:10 AM, "mrs at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
In:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-October/017449.html
we were discussing possible bugs in g++ scoping for if statements.
$ cat t.cc
void foo() {
if (int x = 0) {
int
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 1:38 AM, "ivranos at freemail dot gr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #9 from ivranos at freemail dot gr 2008-10-03 08:38
---
I am sorry but you are not right/specific.
At first there is no struct in the code, only class.
In C+
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:09 AM, "adam at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been experiencing some (for me) rather unexpected behavior with
some C++
code. The following is a very reduced test case:
This comes down to non pod vs pod and tai
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:26 AM, "jrenggli at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The following code results in an error when optimized using -O2 or -
O3 flag,
but works fine with -O1. I've also been able to "confuse" the
optimizer by
adding some code just after or
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2008, at 7:44 PM, "hadmanysons at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Whenever I try to compile something using the iostream library, gcc
pumps out a
lot of errors. Here's the gcc -v -save-temps screen:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-redhat-linux
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 25, 2008, at 10:39 AM, "Miguel A. Quintans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hello
The result of an expression using pre-decrement or pre-increment
such as:
y = x * n * --n;
Try turning on warnings. That is -Wsquence-points. The above is
specified behavi
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2008, at 9:00 AM, "john dot spelis at 3dlabs dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
An expression using ptr arithmetic yields an unusual result
unless a cast is applied;
The problematic expression;
MaxTimings = ((EDIDDetailed *) &pExt->checksum) - pDTD;
That i
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 20, 2008, at 8:26 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-20
15:26 ---
What happens if you remove this piece of code? I suspect we merely
need
to keep the function
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2008, at 10:58 AM, "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Consider this code:
#include
std::string s;
I compiled this with -g and examined the resulting dwarf.
's' is represented as:
<1><24e8>: Abbrev Number: 63 (DW_TAG_variable)
<24e
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 17, 2008, at 8:42 AM, "rbuergel at web dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
typedef unsigned int UInt32;
typedef unsigned char UInt8;
struct Data
{
UInt8 data[16];
const UInt8* getData() const
{
return data + 4;
}
};
struct Value {
UInt32 value;
static
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2008, at 7:25 PM, "martinrb at google dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The docs for preprocessor -dD flag states
`D'
Like `M' except in two respects: it does _not_ include the
predefined macros
I think what it means by predefines ar
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2008, at 7:35 PM, "martinrb at google dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The preprocessor symbol __MMX__ indicates whether this gcc
includes mmx support. This is extremely useful, but undocumented.
I only found out by finding the symbol in other peoples' co
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2008, at 7:44 PM, "martinrb at google dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
How do I find out whether a particular gcc supports a
particular subarchitecture, e.g. MMX instructions, by default?
If the gcc has been configured --with-arch=,
I can get that valu
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2008, at 6:20 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-16
13:20 ---
./cc1 -quiet -O2 t1.i t2.i
t2.i: In function 'Node_print':
t2.i:2: error: non-trivial conversio
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2008, at 11:02 PM, "rwgk at yahoo dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Platform:
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf)
Linux chevy.lbl.gov 2.6.23.15-137.fc8 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:03:13
EST 2008
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
% g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target:
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2008, at 12:58 PM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13
19:58 ---
works for me. Honza, I guess you fixed this recently?
I think this was fixed by the pt.c ch
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2008, at 2:04 AM, "nm127 at freemail dot hu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
With the __attribute__ __section__ it is possible to allocate
variables to
different section than the default (
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Attributes.html ). In
case o
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 7, 2008, at 9:47, "schwab at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
This is broken during sched2 pass. Compiled with -m64 -O2.
lwz 10,1492(7) # nargs,<--- uninitialized
std 9,1272(7)# specpdl.19,
li 9,16 # iftmp.21,
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2008, at 10:42, "niklaus at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #4 from niklaus at gmail dot com 2008-09-06 17:42
---
On the below version of gcc on cygwin (winXP SP3) i don't have any
problems
with optimization on or off. They
This is mostly because of extra register moves that IRA some times
introduces. There is another bug about Inline-asm and the return
register.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 1, 2008, at 7:36, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 1, 2008, at 3:25, "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2008-09-01 10:25 ---
Note that the TLS check code is used in libstdc++-v3, but it's
actually part of
the gene
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 30, 2008, at 21:18, "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2008-08-31 04:18 ---
The proposed patch changes the previous compilation failure into...
I will se
This code is undefined as the value of 32 is outside the range of the
enum.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2008, at 9:29, "gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
This is a copy of a Debian report that I made (I thought I might as
well report
it directly here too): htt
Note for most targets not printing is correct as char is signed by
default but for most powerpc targets the opposite is true. You should
have explicted included signed for g_99.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2008, at 22:10, "regehr at cs dot utah dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Thi
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2008, at 0:35, "linuxl4 at sohu dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
gcc -v
gcc version 4.4.0 20080810 (experimental) (GCC)
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../tests/cxx -I../.. -I../../..
-I../../../tests -O2 -c -o t-ops.o ../../../tests/cxx/t-ops.cc
../../.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2008, at 2:43, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11
09:43 ---
With building the lirc kernel module I am also able to trogger
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lirc-0.8.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2008, at 22:30, "contact at multimedia dot cx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #1 from contact at multimedia dot cx 2008-08-07
05:30 ---
The same thing happens with gcc SVN-138833 (along with FFmpeg SVN
14654)--
dca.c file compilation cr
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2008, at 8:39, "sam at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
--- Comment #2 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 15:39
---
The warning comes from a range check which is emitted by Gigi. The
backend
knows that this check is useles
Try the attribute deprecated.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2008, at 23:50, "Dave at Yost dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
There should be a way to poison a symbol only when it is used as a
function or
macro call. I suggest that following a symbol with a pair of
parentheses might
be
90 matches
Mail list logo
