Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 26, 2009, at 11:54 PM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org > wrote:



------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 06:54 -------
This doesn't look like a GCC bug, but user error.

It is a gcc bug as this dependency is not documented this way. At least I could not find the documention for this one.




--


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39747

Reply via email to