[Bug target/120417] gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

2025-05-23 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417 --- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch --- I'll provide the result of --save-temps later, so you see both the .i and .s files. Note that to link and run the code you'd have to have a matching GnuCOBOL installation (linked tarball has 5MB and only li

[Bug testsuite/120418] embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread alexey.lapshin at espressif dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 Alexey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/120421] -save-temps affects diagnostic position

2025-05-23 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 --- Comment #5 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > But printing out the preprocessed line is equally as wrong in many cases. > Especially when it comes to `#line` markers. That is it is there is no > correct an

[Bug target/120417] gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

2025-05-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-source --- Comment #1 from Sam James

[Bug preprocessor/120421] -save-temps affects diagnostic position

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #3) > For diagnostics, this is not an exact duplicate, this can be addressed while > keeping the column information that is generated today. Here's what Clang > does

[Bug preprocessor/120421] -save-temps affects diagnostic position

2025-05-23 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug c/120180] [OpenMP] ICE in C (c_parser_consume_token) / C++ cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol in error recovery for metadirective

2025-05-23 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120180 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have a patch that fixes the ICE (not fully tested on an offload target yet, though). The issue of whether a metadirective is supposed to be accepted in a loop nest is completely separate from t

[Bug debug/95695] -gcolumn-info is unstable with --save-temps

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/120421] -save-temps affects diagnostic position

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120421] -save-temps affects diagnostic position

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There is not much to be done here really. Column info is basically totally lost from preprocessing.

[Bug c++/120421] New: -save-temps affects diagnostic position

2025-05-23 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 Bug ID: 120421 Summary: -save-temps affects diagnostic position Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/120375] arc: -mcpu=em x >> 31 clobber of CC isn't respected

2025-05-23 Thread keithp at keithp dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120375 --- Comment #2 from keithp at keithp dot com --- Created attachment 61509 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61509&action=edit arc: Clobber CC and LP when shifting without barrel shifter Devices without a barrel shifter end up

[Bug ada/120420] Improving __gnat_decode() gcc/ada/adadecode.c

2025-05-23 Thread kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120420 --- Comment #1 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 61508 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61508&action=edit Godcolt C code

[Bug ada/120420] New: Improving __gnat_decode() gcc/ada/adadecode.c

2025-05-23 Thread kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
c-trunk-20250523/configure --prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap --enable-multiarch --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --enable-cloc

[Bug cobol/119215] -Wodr and -Wlto-type-mismatch issues in cobol

2025-05-23 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119215 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug c++/120412] Modules ICE using decltype and lambda across TUs

2025-05-23 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120412 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/110180] On Fedora 38, egrep is now obsolescent

2025-05-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110180 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Version|unknown

[Bug bootstrap/110180] On Fedora 38, egrep is now obsolescent

2025-05-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110180 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2025-05-23 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 120414, which changed state. Bug 120414 Summary: ICE in module serialization - bad file data https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/120414] ICE in module serialization - bad file data

2025-05-23 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/120363] internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956

2025-05-23 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2025-05-23 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 120363, which changed state. Bug 120363 Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/120414] ICE in module serialization - bad file data

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2486d94bc45a9815395a36cc6dc1e9e3219a74b7 commit r15-9723-g2486d94bc45a9815395a36cc6dc1e9e3219a74b7 Author: Nathaniel She

[Bug c++/120363] internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8f62a9b32668ea77da721cdc8b9403e507637af commit r15-9724-ga8f62a9b32668ea77da721cdc8b9403e507637af Author: Nathaniel She

[Bug c++/120414] ICE in module serialization - bad file data

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43dddeef7a870ce4db7407f73660504b67a0a919 commit r16-855-g43dddeef7a870ce4db7407f73660504b67a0a919 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/120363] internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66e9a4f3083356b064cc64651edad466a56f762b commit r16-856-g66e9a4f3083356b064cc64651edad466a56f762b Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug bootstrap/110180] On Fedora 38, egrep is now obsolescent

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110180 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/120419] grep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120419 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a commit r16-852-g725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a Author: Andi Kleen Date: Tue Apr

[Bug c++/119387] [14 Regression] Regression in performance by a factor of 6 when building with debugging symbols since r14-5979

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119387 --- Comment #24 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a commit r16-852-g725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a Author: Andi Kleen Date: Tue Apr

[Bug other/120419] New: grep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E

2025-05-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120419 Bug ID: 120419 Summary: grep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/117423] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] union not written to with particular layout since r10-6321-g636e80eea24b78

2025-05-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59525|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/101735] Type parameter inquiries for substrings are rejected

2025-05-23 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 61505 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61505&action=edit WIP patch This WIP patch improves the parsing of expressions with inquiry references of substrings,

[Bug lto/110710] LTO linker on Windows creates an invalid Makefile

2025-05-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710 --- Comment #19 from Sam James --- Peter, now that 14.3 is out, maybe propose it as a backport on the ML?

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Starke --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > Note I suspect GCC 15 and 16 are ok though due to how branches to > unreachable are now skipped over for inlining heurstics. I first came accross this issue w

[Bug c++/120409] FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr119916.C

2025-05-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120409 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 See Also|

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

2025-05-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Starke --- Created attachment 61504 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61504&action=edit linker maps before and at regression

[Bug cobol/119457] gcobol: big codegen for simple STRING plus malloc/free (and missing optimization)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119457 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug testsuite/120418] embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug testsuite/120418] embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I use the same dejagnu and they don't fail. And looking at e.g. the gcc-testresults mailing lists, they don't fail for others either (there are some pch/embed-1.c failures in freebsd results but that looks

[Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of Linux-specific facilities.

2025-05-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217 --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe --- what is the "waiting" status for? ( I don't see any trunk commits recently for us to test )

[Bug cobol/119211] [15/16 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug testsuite/120418] embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread alexey.lapshin at espressif dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 --- Comment #3 from Alexey --- I use dejagnu 1.6.3 for testing. And they fails in this way

[Bug testsuite/120418] embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Why do you do that? The tests are meant to be tested with dejagnu, using make check. That passes absolute filenames, which works just fine.

[Bug testsuite/120418] embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread alexey.lapshin at espressif dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 --- Comment #1 from Alexey --- I found this issue because failures appeared when testing a toolchain. I wonder why these tests are not failing for others?

[Bug testsuite/120418] New: embed testcases issue

2025-05-23 Thread alexey.lapshin at espressif dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418 Bug ID: 120418 Summary: embed testcases issue Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assi

[Bug cobol/119215] -Wodr and -Wlto-type-mismatch issues in cobol

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119215 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/119457] gcobol: big codegen for simple STRING plus malloc/free (and missing optimization)

2025-05-23 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119457 --- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch --- I tend to disagree as the referenced one is explicit about MOVE (and of course using matching type assignments and functions, possibly split like for strings using memcpy+memset for space is most reasonable

[Bug cobol/119461] record layout done in odd ways

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119461 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119597] SEGV on Cobol "hello world" on Power

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119597 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of Linux-specific facilities.

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 --- Comment #4 from James K. Lowden --- *** Bug 119457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug cobol/119633] compile error for debug-module USE FOR DEBUGGING

2025-05-23 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119633 --- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch --- Nearly agreed. As long as there is no "WITH DEBUGGING" active (which you can warn or even error on) an indicator D is, just as a * or a / an indicator defining that the line has no executable code. It can a

[Bug c++/120400] C++ FE optimisations reorder && operands.

2025-05-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120400 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Daniel Starke from comment #8) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > Can you provide the preprocessed source? > > > > Also since you are linking to a static binary, can you attach t

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119595] Port libgcobol to 32-bit architectures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119595 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Starke --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Can you provide the preprocessed source? > > Also since you are linking to a static binary, can you attach the before and > after linker map? The linker map be

[Bug cobol/119633] compile error for debug-module USE FOR DEBUGGING

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119633 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Starke --- Created attachment 61503 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61503&action=edit preprocessed file at regression

[Bug libstdc++/120407] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Binary size manifold for static linked MinGW target (e.g. std::__throw_system_error)

2025-05-23 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Starke --- Created attachment 61502 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61502&action=edit preprocessed file before regression

[Bug cobol/119634] compile error: sorry, unimplemented: Global declarative _DECLARATIVES_EVAL1

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119634 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Severity|normal

[Bug cobol/119638] WRITE FROM x BEFORE Y raises compile error (SQ207M)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119638 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119805] FE: COMP-5 / COMP-X issues

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Assignee|unassig

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > Am 23.05.2025 um 16:54 schrieb jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 > > James K. Lowden changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug cobol/119887] runtime-switches are not documented / implemented (and don't pass NC211A and others)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119887 --- Comment #3 from James K. Lowden --- *** Bug 119639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug cobol/119639] runtime switches in SPECIAL NAMES not recognised (parser issue)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119639 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119768] FE: parsing PIC N and NAT is broken

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119768 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119793] FR FE (parser): addition of BASED-STORAGE SECTION (Fujitsu)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119793 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED

[Bug cobol/119887] runtime-switches are not documented / implemented (and don't pass NC211A and others)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119887 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED Assignee|unassign

[Bug libstdc++/120390] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] Request to improve error with private destructor

2025-05-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/120384] [12/13/14/15/16] _BinaryPredicateConcept checks in std::unique_copy are wrong

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120384 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e commit r16-849-g1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug cobol/119896] Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function cbl_field_of

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/119975] clock_gettime in genapi.cc is unportable

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119975 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Assignee|unassig

[Bug libstdc++/120386] std::unique_copy uses the output type for comparisons

2025-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120386 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e commit r16-849-g1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug cobol/119932] cobol builds on s390x-linux-gnu with test failures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119932 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119933] cobol builds on loongarch64-linux-gnu with test failures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119933 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119934] cobol builds on sparc64-linux-gnu with test failures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119934 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119935] libcobol fails to build on powerpc64-linux-gnu when explicitly enabled

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119935 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/120244] cobol.dg/cgroup2: more Valgrind issues in tests

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120244 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/120328] Building gcobol fails in non English systems

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120328 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/120402] gcobol does not check precedence of PIC characters

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120402 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/120402] gcobol does not check precedence of PIC characters

2025-05-23 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120402 --- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch --- Yes, U as per currently IBM (the COBOL Development group is in the process of adding it for the next standard). To handle the precedence - feel free to copy GnuCOBOL's implementation in cobc/tree.c, especia

[Bug cobol/120401] gcobol allows arithmetic on alphanumeric fields

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120401 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug cobol/119454] gcobol: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-save-temps’

2025-05-23 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119454 --- Comment #3 from Simon Sobisch --- The "how to create a bug report" is identical for all GCC frontends (so far). It is documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#detailed > In general, all the information we need can be obtained by collecting t

[Bug cobol/119254] ICE on unterminated cobol string due to use of cbl_internal_error

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119254 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug cobol/119323] cppcheck meets libgcobol

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org Last re

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/120417] New: gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

2025-05-23 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417 Bug ID: 120417 Summary: gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug cobol/119364] building a cobol cross compiler on i686-linux-gnu targeting x86_64-linux-gnu fails

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119364 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org R

[Bug target/110812] Check availability of builtins at expand time

2025-05-23 Thread rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812 --- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp --- Tried building highway to reproduce and hit another error in fre... Do we have a minimal example for this issue?

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119454] gcobol: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-save-temps’

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119454 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Assignee|unassi

[Bug other/54750] conflicting float.h on windows using mingw

2025-05-23 Thread ossman at cendio dot se via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54750 Pierre Ossman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ossman at cendio dot se --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c/120416] New: unreachable() missing on win32, but not win64

2025-05-23 Thread ossman at cendio dot se via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120416 Bug ID: 120416 Summary: unreachable() missing on win32, but not win64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

2025-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed also for 13.4.

  1   2   3   4   >