https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch ---
I'll provide the result of --save-temps later, so you see both the .i and .s
files.
Note that to link and run the code you'd have to have a matching GnuCOBOL
installation (linked tarball has 5MB and only li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
Alexey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421
--- Comment #5 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> But printing out the preprocessed line is equally as wrong in many cases.
> Especially when it comes to `#line` markers. That is it is there is no
> correct an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-source
--- Comment #1 from Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #3)
> For diagnostics, this is not an exact duplicate, this can be addressed while
> keeping the column information that is generated today. Here's what Clang
> does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120180
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have a patch that fixes the ICE (not fully tested on an offload target yet,
though).
The issue of whether a metadirective is supposed to be accepted in a loop nest
is completely separate from t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is not much to be done here really. Column info is basically totally lost
from preprocessing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120421
Bug ID: 120421
Summary: -save-temps affects diagnostic position
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120375
--- Comment #2 from keithp at keithp dot com ---
Created attachment 61509
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61509&action=edit
arc: Clobber CC and LP when shifting without barrel shifter
Devices without a barrel shifter end up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120420
--- Comment #1 from Kael Franco ---
Created attachment 61508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61508&action=edit
Godcolt C code
c-trunk-20250523/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-multiarch --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32
--enable-multilib --enable-cloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119215
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120412
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110180
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110180
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 120414, which changed state.
Bug 120414 Summary: ICE in module serialization - bad file data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 120363, which changed state.
Bug 120363 Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2486d94bc45a9815395a36cc6dc1e9e3219a74b7
commit r15-9723-g2486d94bc45a9815395a36cc6dc1e9e3219a74b7
Author: Nathaniel She
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8f62a9b32668ea77da721cdc8b9403e507637af
commit r15-9724-ga8f62a9b32668ea77da721cdc8b9403e507637af
Author: Nathaniel She
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120414
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43dddeef7a870ce4db7407f73660504b67a0a919
commit r16-855-g43dddeef7a870ce4db7407f73660504b67a0a919
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66e9a4f3083356b064cc64651edad466a56f762b
commit r16-856-g66e9a4f3083356b064cc64651edad466a56f762b
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110180
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a
commit r16-852-g725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119387
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a
commit r16-852-g725063bc1fda6b0403a8b72fce3b4c9cc6a4ba3a
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120419
Bug ID: 120419
Summary: grep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59525|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 61505
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61505&action=edit
WIP patch
This WIP patch improves the parsing of expressions with inquiry references
of substrings,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
--- Comment #19 from Sam James ---
Peter, now that 14.3 is out, maybe propose it as a backport on the ML?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Starke ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> Note I suspect GCC 15 and 16 are ok though due to how branches to
> unreachable are now skipped over for inlining heurstics.
I first came accross this issue w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120409
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Starke ---
Created attachment 61504
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61504&action=edit
linker maps before and at regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119457
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I use the same dejagnu and they don't fail. And looking at e.g. the
gcc-testresults mailing lists, they don't fail for others either (there are
some pch/embed-1.c failures in freebsd results but that looks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
what is the "waiting" status for?
( I don't see any trunk commits recently for us to test )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
--- Comment #3 from Alexey ---
I use dejagnu 1.6.3 for testing. And they fails in this way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Why do you do that?
The tests are meant to be tested with dejagnu, using make check.
That passes absolute filenames, which works just fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
--- Comment #1 from Alexey ---
I found this issue because failures appeared when testing a toolchain. I wonder
why these tests are not failing for others?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120418
Bug ID: 120418
Summary: embed testcases issue
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119215
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119457
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch ---
I tend to disagree as the referenced one is explicit about MOVE (and of course
using matching type assignments and functions, possibly split like for strings
using memcpy+memset for space is most reasonable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119461
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119597
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455
--- Comment #4 from James K. Lowden ---
*** Bug 119457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119633
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch ---
Nearly agreed. As long as there is no "WITH DEBUGGING" active (which you can
warn or even error on) an indicator D is, just as a * or a / an indicator
defining that the line has no executable code.
It can a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120400
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Daniel Starke from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Can you provide the preprocessed source?
> >
> > Also since you are linking to a static binary, can you attach t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119595
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Starke ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Can you provide the preprocessed source?
>
> Also since you are linking to a static binary, can you attach the before and
> after linker map?
The linker map be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119633
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Starke ---
Created attachment 61503
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61503&action=edit
preprocessed file at regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120407
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Starke ---
Created attachment 61502
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61502&action=edit
preprocessed file before regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119634
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119638
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 23.05.2025 um 16:54 schrieb jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455
>
> James K. Lowden changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119887
--- Comment #3 from James K. Lowden ---
*** Bug 119639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119639
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119768
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119793
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119887
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120384
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e
commit r16-849-g1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119975
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120386
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e
commit r16-849-g1bb7a195e7cf95537534a42e7aa8705cc78eba4e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119932
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119933
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119934
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119935
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120244
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120328
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120402
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120402
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch ---
Yes, U as per currently IBM (the COBOL Development group is in the process of
adding it for the next standard).
To handle the precedence - feel free to copy GnuCOBOL's implementation in
cobc/tree.c, especia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120401
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119454
--- Comment #3 from Simon Sobisch ---
The "how to create a bug report" is identical for all GCC frontends (so far).
It is documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#detailed
> In general, all the information we need can be obtained by collecting t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119254
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
Last re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417
Bug ID: 120417
Summary: gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV,
workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119364
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp ---
Tried building highway to reproduce and hit another error in fre...
Do we have a minimal example for this issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119454
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Assignee|unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54750
Pierre Ossman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ossman at cendio dot se
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120416
Bug ID: 120416
Summary: unreachable() missing on win32, but not win64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 13.4.
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo