https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #19)
> Fixed by 92b6485a75cabaf64f1f74ba7ab73a5204c9d0aa .

Some aspects of this might well be fixed by the commit
(r16-698-g92b6485a75caba) 
- but not all - We still have ≈ 90 fails on x86_64-darwin all of this form:

FAIL: cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob   -O0  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/src-local/gcc-master/gcc/testsuite/cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob:51:22:
sorry, unimplemented: SECTION segment '' is not ISO syntax

with two exceptions:
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: cobol.dg/group2/INSPECT_ISO_Example_7.cob   -Os  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/src-local/gcc-master/gcc/testsuite/cobol.dg/group2/INSPECT_ISO_Example_7.cob:40:20:
sorry, unimplemented: SECTION segment '^A<U+0093>ÌLøÿ^]^A^Y' is not ISO syntax


see, for example:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-May/847791.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-May/847788.html

(which  are both from revisions after that commit)


I have re-opened this bug - but could file a new one if you'd prefer?

Reply via email to