https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118182
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680824.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93010
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118182
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The problem is that the @pred_broadcast pattern expands to _zvfh insns
even when _zero or _imm would do. The scalar constant gets allocated to a
register, and vec_duplicated in the pred_broadcast insn, on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119748
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
The _S_copy_range(pointer __p, _Rg&& __rg, size_type __n) help committed
yesterday also needs to be fixed for the contiguous_range branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119456
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119694
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119694
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:711c10383f494b316c5919aa0141f6fa609578b4
commit r15-9392-g711c10383f494b316c5919aa0141f6fa609578b4
Author: Bob Dubner
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80813
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #38 from Nicolas Boulenguez ---
Created attachment 61085
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61085&action=edit
variant of v14 patch 2 defining the link symbols in System.OS_Constants
This variant of patch 2 in v14 d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113835
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew ---
Excuse me, but it'll again compile 20 hours or so.
No, it's highly unlikely literally every distro has 'packaging issues' and
exactly with gm2 — maybe the better way would be if you first try the example
program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zbigniew from comment #2)
> It is compiled (the whole 14.2 'suite') from the sources. But I doubt
> Slackware's scripts interfere with GM2 subdirectories in any way. You can
> easily check Slack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew ---
It is compiled (the whole 14.2 'suite') from the sources. But I doubt
Slackware's scripts interfere with GM2 subdirectories in any way. You can
easily check Slackware-current scripts, they are available on any Sl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119750
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew ---
Indeed, I didn't try any other compilation since that time. It reports:
gcc hw.c -o hw.o
Assembler messages:
Internal error (Illegal instruction).
Please report this bug.
Well I did compilation of GCC 11.5 on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-slackware-linux
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751
Bug ID: 119751
Summary: There's a need to tidy up m2 subdirectories' contents
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-11
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119750
Bug ID: 119750
Summary: Unable to compile GCC 14.2 using GCC 11.5 — on 32-bit
x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c6bd95b1811d797f43983dbbeb4ad478bdb5c9e
commit r13-9517-g7c6bd95b1811d797f43983dbbeb4ad478bdb5c9e
Author: Alex Coplan
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:498933e54dc4669276951d27d3b1bcdc0d4bacb4
commit r15-9390-g498933e54dc4669276951d27d3b1bcdc0d4bacb4
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119732
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119346
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> Basically you update the min/max values and the value/mask by doing the
> shifts. And I think the rest will fall out.
That is actually done. But for some rea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111536
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh I think I know how to fix this case.
In scalar_min_max_arsh, Replace:
/* Its not easy to operate on alu32 bounds here because it depends
* on bits being shifted in from upper 32-bits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119749
Bug ID: 119749
Summary: Functions with attribute malloc only warn of
possibly-NULL use if attribute has a deallocator
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105548
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> > Just a quick update. It looks like undefined code in the verifier producing
> > a verification error.
>
> Sor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105548
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93f6ea830348a5a733ecde863cddae80d84bdda0
commit r15-9389-g93f6ea830348a5a733ecde863cddae80d84bdda0
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 119746, which changed state.
Bug 119746 Summary: -Wstrict-aliasing warning on calling pointer to member
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119746
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bungeman at chromium dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119747
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-11
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119747
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119748
Bug ID: 119748
Summary: std::string::string(InputIterator, InputIterator)
rejects volatile charT* as iterator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119747
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
Clang's diagnostic is equivalent to gcc's for this example:
:9:5: error: expected expression
9 | CALL_F(1, 2);
| ^
:6:40: note: expanded from macro 'CALL_F'
6 | #define CALL_F(v, ...) f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119747
Bug ID: 119747
Summary: Request for clearer diagnostic when consecutive commas
appear in a function call
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119732
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
After rebuilding GCC with checking enabled I get the following trace:
constexpr.core2.ii: In instantiation of ‘array convert_mask() [with _Tp =
array]’:
constexpr.core2.ii:10:22: required from here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> Just a quick update. It looks like undefined code in the verifier producing
> a verification error.
Sorry this is incorrect. basically the problem is we have:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just a quick update. It looks like undefined code in the verifier producing a
verification error.
scalar32_min_max_arsh does:
u64 umin_val = src_reg->u32_min_value;
/* Upon reaching here,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82265
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119702
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61078|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119746
Bug ID: 119746
Summary: -Wstrict-aliasing warning on calling pointer to member
function
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118182
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
bisection with this PR's patch led me to the patch that added the late-combine
pass as the one that enables the intended result. That's all I know so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66963
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||regis.duchesne at broadcom dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119745
Bug ID: 119745
Summary: [C++23] Implement P2438R2, basic_string::substr() &&
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119744
Bug ID: 119744
Summary: [C++23] Implement P2711R1, Making multi-param
constructors of views explicit
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119725
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
I do not (yet) have access to solaris machine. Would it be possible for you to
verify that all tests passes with following adjustments:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/format/debug.cc
b/libstdc++-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119743
Bug ID: 119743
Summary: [C++26] Implement P0447R28, std::hive
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119742
Bug ID: 119742
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2697R1, Interfacing bitset with
string_view
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119741
Bug ID: 119741
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2495R3, Interfacing stringstreams
with string_view
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-11
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119727
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
Yes but on the OS where you know it it's better to do both to make the runs
more reproducible. There are also bugs that don't reproduce on ASLR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119740
Bug ID: 119740
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2714R1, Bind front and back to NTTP
callables
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119739
Bug ID: 119739
Summary: [C++25] Implement P0952R2, A new specification for
std::generate_canonical
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119546
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119737
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The except.cc code does:
```
switch_to_exception_section (fnname);
/* If the target wants a label to begin the table, emit it here. */
targetm.asm_out.emit_except_table_label (asm_out_file);
/* D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119738
Bug ID: 119738
Summary: __builtin_choose_expr(__builtin_constant_p(...), ...,
...) is sometimes incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119736
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
>→ ICE is a '15 Regression' - as mentioned in comment 0
No, well it is a GCC 14/15 regression but only with checking enabled ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119736
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.1.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119502
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> I am curious what other compilers do with this.
>
> program foo
> integer :: iun = -1
> open (iun)
> write(iun,*) "This is a test."
> close (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119737
Bug ID: 119737
Summary: GCN/C++ vs. 'as': 'LLVM ERROR: Size expression must be
absolute.'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119502
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> Intel:
>
> This is a test.
Forgot to say: this goes to stdout, not to file.
There is no fort.-1 or the like.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119735
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:985ae5ae9d76f5ea10996ec7466c4d636840495a
commit r15-9388-g985ae5ae9d76f5ea10996ec7466c4d636840495a
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119597
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Jeevitha is looking into this, but the last thing I saw, it looked like an
issue on powerpc where the callee mistakenly thinks the caller has allocated a
param save area (which is located in the caller's sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119735
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118182
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119736
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119736
Bug ID: 119736
Summary: rejected/ICEs when non type template parameter used as
an argument to a const ref non type template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119735
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 61082
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61082&action=edit
Proposed fix
Proposed fix removing ' and %n from m2 comments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119735
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119735
Bug ID: 119735
Summary: make gcc.pot generates warnings in the m2 code base
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119502
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119733
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119718
--- Comment #13 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
This is the change I made to report warnings when was
maybe_complain_about_tail_call called:
heine:~/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline/gcc> git diff
diff --git a/gcc/calls.cc b/gcc/calls.cc
index b3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119734
Bug ID: 119734
Summary: nvptx/C++ vs. '_ZTISt8bad_cast' ('typeinfo for
std::bad_cast')
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443
Bug 118443 depends on bug 119733, which changed state.
Bug 119733 Summary: store-merging increases alignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119733
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119733
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Without h field, GCC does produce the correct alignment at least on the RTL
level:
```
(insn 7 6 0 (set (reg:DI 98 [ _26 ])
(mem:DI (reg/v/f:DI 100 [ qD.2840 ]) [0 MEM [(voidD.54
*)q_2(D)]+0 S8 A16]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116178
Janez Zemva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janezz55 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119733
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 61081 [details]
> > try this untested patch
>
> I had a typo:
> "(register_operand (oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119733
Bug ID: 119733
Summary: store-merging increases alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61081
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61081&action=edit
try this untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
--- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Furthermore, if two threads call the non-const begin() concurrently on a shared
rep, they both want to make a new clone and release their reference to the old
rep. If they both allocate a new clone and sto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> Created attachment 61081 [details]
> try this untested patch
I had a typo:
"(register_operand (operands[0], mode)
|| reg_or_imm_operand (operands[1], ))"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC:
r1 = r10
r3 += r5
r1 += -16
call113
.LBE7:
r2 = *(u32 *) (r10+-16)
*(u32 *) (r10+-24) = r2
clang:
call 113
.Ltmp27:
.Ltmp28:
.loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119731
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Note I would not call this wrong code. It might be a verifier not liking the
> produced code but the code is still correct in terms of the underlying ISA.
And i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119725
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
