https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
曾治金 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhijin.zeng at spacemit dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119554
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> With flatten enabled at -O2 I get an ICE:
> during IPA pass: inline
> Interpreter.cpp:3841:1: internal compiler error: in redirect_callee, at
> cgraph.cc:1391
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
With flatten enabled at -O2 I get an ICE:
during IPA pass: inline
Interpreter.cpp:3841:1: internal compiler error: in redirect_callee, at
cgraph.cc:1391
0x293749f internal_error(char const*, ...)
/ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119562
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
[apinski@xeond2 gcc]$ ./cc1 t.c
t.c:2:1: error: unterminated raw string
2 | X
| ^
t.c:2:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x2610edf internal_error(char const*, ...)
/home/apins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119562
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119562
Bug ID: 119562
Summary: ICE on trunk when trying to token-paste a raw string
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117869
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Since r15-9083-gd560f3f9594339, 1.49 should work again, but it needs
documenting still.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117879
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Bug 70150 depends on bug 66398, which changed state.
Bug 66398 Summary: g++.dg/abi/anon1.C FAILs with PIE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Bug 70150 depends on bug 66399, which changed state.
Bug 66399 Summary: g++.dg/abi/anon4.C FAILs with PIE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Bug 70150 depends on bug 66403, which changed state.
Bug 66403 Summary: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-self.c FAILs with PIE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106568
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119561
Bug ID: 119561
Summary: GCC hasn't completely forbidden user-declared
specializations of std::initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116835
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119473
Hu Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560
Bug ID: 119560
Summary: cc1 posix_spawnp compilation error with gcc 14.2.0 on
Ubuntu 24.04
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119473
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5cfa7f797b79613e5483786484567b9ca72db06
commit r15-9117-ge5cfa7f797b79613e5483786484567b9ca72db06
Author: Hu, Lin1
Date: Wed Mar 26 16:15:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also can you go into /home/ssmedley/gcc/build-14.2.0/./gcc and invoke:
/home/ssmedley/gcc/build-14.2.0/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/ssmedley/gcc/build-14.2.0/./gcc/ -fno-checking -xc -nostdinc /dev/null
-S -o /dev/nul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|driver |bootstrap
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116835
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60942
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60942&action=edit
Finally figured out how best to handle this
patch which I am testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119530
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119387
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
Created attachment 60941
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60941&action=edit
reduced memory-hog testcase
I managed to distill a large chunk of the front end memory-hog into the
attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119525
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116835
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60940
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60940&action=edit
Testcase that fails even at -O2
Here is a testcase which fails even at -O2. The reason is aggregates copies a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110498
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.3.0, 14.2.0
Summary|[12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119558
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-31
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119526
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foom at fuhm dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119558
--- Comment #3 from Peter Damianov ---
the -fdeclone-ctor-dtor ICE is PR108383
I put a reduced testcase there but unfortunately no one confirmed it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119533
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> > Does go use sjlj EH "manually"? EH shouldn't result in EDGE_ABNORMAL ...
>
> /* Strange flow, like a computed jump or exception handling. Usually
>this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 60939
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60939&action=edit
Simple fix
This patch is a simple fix. I'll submit one streaming the necessary type to
the mailing list thoug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119550
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Bustico ---
Tested, works perfectly, thanks for the outstanding reactivity.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119533
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-31
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114758
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.3.0, 14.2.0
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119150
--- Comment #10 from Alex Pomeranz ---
Now that's service! :) Thanks Jakub and everyone else who contributed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119550
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119550
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97cbe3cd5f36470884e940bda4469dc9b5b93cfd
commit r15-9110-g97cbe3cd5f36470884e940bda4469dc9b5b93cfd
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119559
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110498
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa3aaf2bfb8fcc17076993df4297597b68bc5f60
commit r15-9112-gaa3aaf2bfb8fcc17076993df4297597b68bc5f60
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114758
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f6c19f307c8de9830130a0ba071c24e3835beb3
commit r15-9111-g1f6c19f307c8de9830130a0ba071c24e3835beb3
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
It occurs to me that if an inline variable in an MIU has non-trivial [cd]tion,
we have to emit it (and [cd]truct it) in the MIU already, so we could take
option #1 for that case even without ABI blessing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> I might be missing to set some elem_len or span or ...
Testcase:
module operations
implicit none
contains
pure function c_op (i, j) result (ij)
cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119559
Bug ID: 119559
Summary: [15 regression] GOMP: ICE in
modify_call_for_omp_dispatch
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 60936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60936&action=edit
Patch for reduce.c
This patch fixes the stride calculation for the result array of the reduce
intri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119557
Bug ID: 119557
Summary: malloc attribute on function decls and merging
interaction with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119522
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
vector(8) mask__2.12;
_72;
_78;
_72 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
pr119534.c:1:6: error: integral result type precision does not match field size
of ‘bit_field_ref’
_78 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
r12-2836-g08aa0e3d4f781fd6a6e293bb06d280365a0bdc1d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Started with r12-5392-g527e54a431473cc497204226a21f2831d2375e66
This just changed the IR coming into the vectorizer.
Before we had:
```
_7 = _1 <= j_21 ? 8 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > Started with r12-5392-g527e54a431473cc497204226a21f2831d2375e66
> Can someone redo the bisect with the addition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119556
Bug ID: 119556
Summary: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119557
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I should mention, malloc inlining is not the issue but rather it is the inline
of the free. So handling this is even constrained. So maybe this is a
documentation fix to warn about it and make a mention that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119558
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119557
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119558
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, meta-bug
--- Comment #1 from Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119558
Bug ID: 119558
Summary: [meta-bug] Improve Link Time Optimization on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119557
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119537
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfc9520eab16379aa47121d336bfd4d38c6d040a
commit r13-9480-gbfc9520eab16379aa47121d336bfd4d38c6d040a
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119553
--- Comment #3 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
Created attachment 60933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60933&action=edit
Proof of concept fix
I could reproduce it on my system, and this patch fixed the crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119553
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jorgen Kvalsvik :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de742091f4df997f426d99bcfed3c44914788033
commit r15-9072-gde742091f4df997f426d99bcfed3c44914788033
Author: Jørgen Kvalsvik
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119460
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The dump-tree has the following call:
_gfortran_reduce_scalar ((void *) &sr.5, &parm.4,
__reduce_wrapper_t_add_test_reduce, 0B, 0B, 0B, 0B);
However, setting a breakpoint at reduce.c:234:
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6a2da499ab8b6b9e52cec5bc32bbd48371bb6ba
commit r14-11489-ga6a2da499ab8b6b9e52cec5bc32bbd48371bb6ba
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119460
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60932|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119550
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/679777.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 117002, which changed state.
Bug 117002 Summary: [13/14/15 Regression] lifetime.d: In function
‘_d_newclassT’: error: size of array element is not a multiple of its alignment
with -Warray-bounds and -O2
https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fadadbbbc2b5352e5e70e0e1a9be9b447176913
commit r15-9070-g9fadadbbbc2b5352e5e70e0e1a9be9b447176913
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sat M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97831
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I think this was rejected 3 years ago:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg02221.html
Note clang's not_tail_called does NOT apply to the funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||97831
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113905
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
See also bug #118690 for some Fortran issues related to declare variant
diagnostic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119460
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118762
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 60931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60931&action=edit
Assembler output
Looks like check should be xfailed on 64-bit hppa-hpux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119553
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119553
--- Comment #1 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
Thanks for the report. I think I know what's wrong. When -fpath-coverage (and
really -fprofile-arcs, -fcondition-coverage) is used without -ftest-coverage,
some file output is not enabled. There is a guard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Severity|nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-31
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119545
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119550
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Bustico ---
Created attachment 60930
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60930&action=edit
config.log compressed
libstdc++-v3/config.log after the failed build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119550
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Bustico ---
@Christophe Lyon : config.log after failed build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116398
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
There's very little use for a non-constexpr inline variable in a module,
anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119369
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #5)
> However, given that weak symbols are known to be half-broken then maybe
> -fno-weak is the correct solution in that configuration?
I'd prefer to not do that,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118690
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The following (cf. Bug #113905) is related, invalid but probably not detected:
!$omp declare target (f1 : f0) match(context={parallel})
!$omp declare target (f2 : f0) match(context={target})
This violates:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119545
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
