https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #4 from Jeevitha ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Oh this is just a testsuite issue.
>
>
> `-fno-ipa-icf` is needed as now insert_di_0_v2 and insert_di_0 can figure
> out are the same function so insert_di_0_v2 bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
--- Comment #2 from Haochen Jiang ---
I have got the upcoming target in thread test fail:
...failed updating 18 targets...
testing.capture-output
../../../bin.v2/libs/thread/test/ex_executor.test/gcc-15/dbg/thrd-mlt/vsblt-hdn/ex_executor.run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reason is before:
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3978)[_2] = x_6(D);
and:
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3983)[_2] = x_6(D);
Could not figure out was doing the same access. Fixing the bug in
ao_compare::compare_ao_refs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117452
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-buil |[15 Regression]
|tin-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117452
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a6cafd7f55c6e88a9780b91039257572038535
commit r15-8461-g62a6cafd7f55c6e88a9780b91039257572038535
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Bug ID: 119383
Summary: [15 Regression] Boost 1.85 lib build fail after commit
r15-8011
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see how that alias patch could cause this failure since the testcase
does not have any structs in it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
Bug ID: 119382
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c fail starting with
r15-7961-gdc47161c1f32c3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> (Why doesn't size get folded?)
Because it is not a const integer expression in C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So as I mentioned on IRC, clang implements a slightly different extension
compared to GCC. clang decides that size is a constant integer expression
handles it that way and gives a warning about it:
```
:5:22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119270
--- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang ---
>From my run, it should have fixed the regression. Thx!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24b6d2014035073870d9d8dae9152fc16fc319fd
commit r15-8447-g24b6d2014035073870d9d8dae9152fc16fc319fd
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(Why doesn't size get folded?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
int main() {
const int size = 4096;
union {
char buffer[size];
bool req;
} u;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
Bug ID: 119381
Summary: -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern fails on
libnetfilter_conntrack-1.1.0 (sorry, unimplemented:
__builtin_clear_padding not supported for variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> I am going to at least regtest it for aarch64 and x86_64. and I did check we
> get the correct code now too.
I did a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu and th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
Bug ID: 119380
Summary: [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with
allocatable and procedure pointer components
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
เพราะธุรกิจรอไม่ได้
สินเชื่อสำหรับเจ้าของบริษัท เจ้าของกิจการ
✅สินเชื่อเจ้าของธุรกิจ
✅วงเงินกู้สูงสุด10 ล้านบาท
✅รู้ผลอนุมัติไวใน 30 นาที
✅ไม่ต้องมีคนค้ำ
✅ดอกเบี้ยต่ำ ตลอดสัญญา
...นี่ไม่ใช่ทางเลือก...แต่เป็นทางรอด👏👏
LINE : 0968582917
โทร : 096-858-2917 (คุณ.ไอซ์)
พร้อมยินดีให้บริการ.💸🙏
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119379
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60827
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60827&action=edit
Semi reduced
The concept for the type alias does not need to be depedent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-20
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119379
Bug ID: 119379
Summary: [15 regression] ICE on CTAD for alias template with
type constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119378
Bug ID: 119378
Summary: Nested template class friend of template class
produces "internal compiler error: unexpected
expression ‘T’ of kind template_parm_index"
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
I can regtest it for you (and check it fixes the testcases) at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60826
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60826&action=edit
Patch which seems to work
I have no way to test this patch for arm so it would be a good idea if someone
else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #13 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 119316, which changed state.
Bug 119316 Summary: [14/15 Regression] new expression incorrectly required to
have constant expression size inside a requires constraint of a template
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3292ca9b0818c3e55102413c2407711d0755d280
commit r15-8453-g3292ca9b0818c3e55102413c2407711d0755d280
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2dcdbfa34fe0212b827344ee22f2c9039921f5c
commit r14-11423-ga2dcdbfa34fe0212b827344ee22f2c9039921f5c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80e1dac3849b134ebd5e0151e9c9e4b8b091de72
commit r15-8452-g80e1dac3849b134ebd5e0151e9c9e4b8b091de72
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
For completeness for searching etc: this shows up with Firefox when building
Skia too:
```
gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkRasterPipeline_opts.h:1603:31: error: cannot
tail-call: other reasons
```
amonakov gave:
```
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen ---
For the gcc 15 release we could just drop the clang:: support, so it becomes
opt-in? (have to use gnu::musttail)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Overall, I see:
```
+ === cobol tests ===
+
+Running cobol:/gcc/testsuite/cobol.dg/dg.exp ...
+FAIL: cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob -O0 (internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault)
+FAIL: cobo
g='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.1 20250319 (experimental)
be671ec1f30ecd55aaff09048afb2a619018cb8a (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit
e36bfd9d8fde238e78a3ea7aacac14d2953f25ce)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is a better example:
```
void f(int *);
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void h(int *b)
{
[[clang::musttail]]
return f(b);
}
void g(int *b)
{
int a;
h(&a);
[[clang::musttail]]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119270
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c443e128802bd93158a3db7c4edf5fc1fc76c8d
commit r15-8449-g6c443e128802bd93158a3db7c4edf5fc1fc76c8d
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-19
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Bug ID: 119376
Summary: protobuf-29.2 fails to build (error: cannot tail-call:
call may throw exception that does not propagate)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108152
--- Comment #4 from nightstrike ---
>From Andrew on IRC: use __extension__ before __SIZE_TYPE__
This should alleviate the pedantic warnings while (I believe) not invalidating
the point of the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This was fixed by r15-6779-g20385cb92cbd4a .
Which means the workaround is to use `-march=armv8.3-a+pauth`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> Looks related to pr118747, where an elemental subroutine was used
> instead of a function.
It has some similarities. Since Andre did the fix on that one, we need to se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0
Keywords|needs-bisecti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119375
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Do the PR117790 fixes help this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; shift_36 = 19 - _8;
(insn 20 19 0 (set (reg/v:SI 133 [ shiftD.6157 ])
(minus:SI (const_int 19 [0x13])
(reg:SI 121 [ _8 ]))) "/app/example.cpp":33:11 discrim 1 -1
(nil))
;; vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||myokaski at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119375
Bug ID: 119375
Summary: Some autofdo test cases fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105848
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
commit r14-11422-g9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Bug ID: 119374
Summary: armv7ve+neon-vfpv4: Miscompilation with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #14)
> "Wait for me! I am your leader!"
>
> I am not *used* to this.
>
> What I *am* used to is people telling me there's a problem in my code, and
> then standin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
commit r14-11422-g9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13 Regression]
|t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119350
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ecf468c9a30b5a6da86812b912fe3368437c8b9
commit r15-8446-g7ecf468c9a30b5a6da86812b912fe3368437c8b9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119350
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks related to pr118747, where an elemental subroutine was used
instead of a function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #3 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Comment on attachment 60822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60822
Excerpt of the RISC-V assembly
$ riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -S -fverbose-asm -Ofast -mabi=lp64d
-march=rv64gcv_zvl256b_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> Andrew, any progress on bisecting the bootstrap failure?
I put all of the details I have found about the bisect in PR 118615. Including
the small testcase whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118615
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I'd at least suggest:
--- gcc/lra-constraints.cc.jj 2025-02-01 00:47:07.926078697 +0100
+++ gcc/lra-constraints.cc 2025-03-19 18:54:08.035516274 +0100
@@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ static machine_mode curr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #1 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Created attachment 60821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60821&action=edit
Excerpt of the AArch64 assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
Bug ID: 119373
Summary: RISC-V: missed unrolling opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Context of the following (sub-)task: nvptx is '!TARGET_SUPPORTS_ALIASES', but
the host usually is 'TARGET_SUPPORTS_ALIASES', and therefore invokes the
'gcc/cp/optimize.cc:can_alias_cdtor' optimization, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #14 from Robert Dubner ---
"Wait for me! I am your leader!"
I am not *used* to this.
What I *am* used to is people telling me there's a problem in my code, and then
standing around tapping their feet impatiently until I fix it.
O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-19
Version|14.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113634
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12b2c414b6d0e0d1b3d328b58d654c19c30bee8c
commit r15-8445-g12b2c414b6d0e0d1b3d328b58d654c19c30bee8c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #2 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Created attachment 60822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60822&action=edit
Excerpt of the RISC-V assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119062
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #14)
> It has taken me a ridiculously long time to figure out that you are creating
> trees for numeric values, and then doing arithmetic on those trees at
> compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #4 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Comment on attachment 60821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60821
Excerpt of the AArch64 assembly
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -S -fverbose-asm -Ofast -mabi=lp64 -march=armv9-a+sve2
-ms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Also, I wonder about different calls in the same function with different ABIs
(whether from IPA-RA which finds out some call doesn't clobber some reg while
another one does, or function attributes, ...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or final.cc could arrange through length attributes if supported by the target
to emit artificial debug_hooks->source_line calls if the length since the last
source_line change is longer than say 16384 bytes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113076
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Andrew, any progress on bisecting the bootstrap failure?
In any case, looking at the patch:
+ if (call_save_p && latest_call_insn != NULL)
+/* PR116028: If original_regno is a pseudo that has been ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Bug ID: 119372
Summary: Aarch64: Compiling with -march=armv8-a+pauth
-mbranch-protection=standard produces autiasp and
retaa in the function epilogue
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119371
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Bisecting points at the following commit - but that seems to rather reveal the
issue and not causing it: r15-3135-gcb51e0b236c7d4
lto: Don't check obj.found for offload section
obj.found is the num
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
