[Bug fortran/86052] ICE with parameterized derived types

2021-11-09 Thread b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052 Bastiaan Braams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.j.braams at cwi dot nl --- Comment #

[Bug ipa/97403] Ancestor jump function should be generalized

2021-11-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Martin, I think we can close this (possibly adding the testcase)

[Bug ipa/103164] New: -fipa-pta degrades aliasing oracle for tramp3d

2021-11-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164 Bug ID: 103164 Summary: -fipa-pta degrades aliasing oracle for tramp3d Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: i

[Bug fortran/84008] [PDT] ICE accessing kind and len parameters

2021-11-09 Thread b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84008 Bastiaan Braams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.j.braams at cwi dot nl --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/103158] [PDT] ICE on arithmetic with type parameter

2021-11-09 Thread b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103158 Bastiaan Braams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83762] ICE on variable declaration with undefined PDT parameter

2021-11-09 Thread b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83762 Bastiaan Braams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.j.braams at cwi dot nl --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/103154] [PDT] Crashing gfortran due to bad type parameter specification since r8-3181-g87f3a5cfb59347cd

2021-11-09 Thread b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103154 Bastiaan Braams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103161] [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure

2021-11-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/102464] Miss optimization for (_Float16) sqrtf ((float) f16)

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b879d40a17ec0409f1a2cd9ab6134bb28f53eea8 commit r12-5079-gb879d40a17ec0409f1a2cd9ab6134bb28f53eea8 Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Nov

[Bug target/103124] PPC: "mr" instruction is unnecessary when extending DI to V1TI

2021-11-09 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/103077] [12 Regression] -ftree-loop-vectorize and -ftree-slp-vectorize are enabled at -O2 but their documentation says they are only enabled at -O3 and above

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103077 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/103151] ICE in extract_insn with __m256h and variable vec insert and -O1 -mavx512fp16 -mxop since r12-3407-g9e2a82e1f9d2c4af

2021-11-09 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103151 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- vpcmov can be extended to V8HF/V16HF under TARGET_XOP, i'm testing a patch.

[Bug c++/86491] bogus and unsuppressible warning: 'YYY' has a base 'ZZZ' whose type uses the anonymous namespace

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86491 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/101917] [11 Regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overread with -flto when passing zero sized arrays

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101917 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/103161] [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/88232] Please implement -Winfinite-recursion

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/103161] [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/103161] [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/101529] [11 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og caused by r11-2192

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.0 Summary|[11/12 Regressi

[Bug target/101529] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og caused by r11-2192

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230 commit r12-5078-g52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Sa

[Bug ipa/103155] [12 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:813

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/103155] [12 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:813

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > I am able to reproduce this at r12-4982-g962ff7d2849 as described in the > bug, trying to see if a latter revision fixed the problem. It is also broken at r12-4

[Bug c++/56189] Infinite recursion with noexcept when instantiating function template

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56189 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/59702] Infinite recursion in a late-specified return type of a function template

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59702 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug other/103163] New: stack_limit_rtx is created too early

2021-11-09 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 Bug ID: 103163 Summary: stack_limit_rtx is created too early Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug ipa/103155] [12 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:813

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I am able to reproduce this at r12-4982-g962ff7d2849 as described in the bug, trying to see if a latter revision fixed the problem.

[Bug fortran/101919] Inconsistent -Wstringop-overread warning with -flto

2021-11-09 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/103049] [C++23] P0849R8 - auto(x): decay-copy in the language

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/68800] Fortran FE produces many memory leaks

2021-11-09 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800 --- Comment #6 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer --- at least a few down with r12-5073: == LEAK SUMMARY: -==definitely lost: 9,471 bytes in 14 blocks -==indirectly lost: 18,267 bytes in 364 blocks +==definitely lost: 6,472 bytes in 8 bl

[Bug c++/103049] [C++23] P0849R8 - auto(x): decay-copy in the language

2021-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah. If we change the wording, we should change it consistently, and perhaps it would be useful to do that because the current wording suggests only a single pair of -std= options, while we mean that level

[Bug c++/103049] [C++23] P0849R8 - auto(x): decay-copy in the language

2021-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I'm afraid "only available with" is the customary form we use throughout the front end, so in the patch I'm just sticking to that form.

[Bug c++/103049] [C++23] P0849R8 - auto(x): decay-copy in the language

2021-11-09 Thread webrown.cpp at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 --- Comment #2 from W E Brown --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Patch on review. In the proposed patch, I respectfully recommend a slight rewording of the new pedwarn messages in gcc/cp/semantics.c and gcc/cp/typeck2.c: eithe

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 --- Comment #31 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bernhard Reutner-Fischer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661 commit r12-5073-g8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661 Author: Bernhard Reut

[Bug fortran/68800] Fortran FE produces many memory leaks

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bernhard Reutner-Fischer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661 commit r12-5073-g8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661 Author: Bernhard Reutn

[Bug fortran/101919] Inconsistent -Wstringop-overread warning with -flto

2021-11-09 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug tree-optimization/103148] [12 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_loop, at tree-vect-loop.c:3155

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103148 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/103150] Structure return is not optimized on 32-bit targets

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103150 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think it's exactly those changes which have caused this FAIL. See PR libstdc++/103133 (which I have a patch for, and which fixes this). Is everybody seeing this FAIL using glibc 2.34?

[Bug libstdc++/103162] overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/103155] [12 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:813

2021-11-09 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- It ICEs on both my machines, but I cannot reproduce it on godbolt. Give me some time to see if I manage to get something meaningful out of it w/ gdb. % gcc-12.0.0 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-1

[Bug libstdc++/103162] overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/103049] [C++23] P0849R8 - auto(x): decay-copy in the language

2021-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek

[Bug libstdc++/103162] overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug tree-optimization/103145] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overread with an array argument

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103145 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|False positive of |[11 Regression] bogus

[Bug tree-optimization/103145] False positive of -Wstringop-overread on gcc-11

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103145 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0, 12.0 Blocks|

[Bug fortran/101919] Inconsistent -Wstringop-overread warning with -flto

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||97048 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/103152] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-1055-gb6bdd7a4cb41ee0

2021-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103152 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102622] [9 Regression] Wrong code with -O1 and above due to phiopt and signed one bit integer types

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622 --- Comment #29 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa commit r12-5071-gf7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa Author: Andrew Pinski Date: T

[Bug rtl-optimization/10352] [3.2.1 regression] ICE in find_reloads_toplev

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10352 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa commit r12-5071-gf7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tue

[Bug libstdc++/103162] overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods

2021-11-09 Thread florin.iucha at amd dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162 Florin Iucha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102513] [10.11.12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

2021-11-09 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.2.0, 12.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/103158] [PDT] ICE on arithmetic with type parameter

2021-11-09 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103158 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on arithmetic with type |[PDT] ICE on arithmetic

[Bug fortran/103154] [PDT] Crashing gfortran due to bad type parameter specification since r8-3181-g87f3a5cfb59347cd

2021-11-09 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103154 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Crashing gfortran due to|[PDT] Crashing gfortran due

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

2021-11-09 Thread n60wb42d2 at relay dot firefox.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 n60wb42d2 at relay dot firefox.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n60wb42d2 at relay do

[Bug bootstrap/102831] [12 regression] Spurious -Wparentheses etc. warnings

2021-11-09 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6) > > If it's reliably reproducible (ideally with a cross), can you attach a > translation unit and the options to use

[Bug libstdc++/103162] overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- "A derived class shall implement this function to return a pointer to allocated storage (6.7.5.5.2) with a size of at least bytes, aligned to the specified alignment." And 6.7.5.5.2 says: "An allocation

[Bug tree-optimization/103161] [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure

2021-11-09 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I suspect the same underlying issue is affecting the test on line #243 as well.

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread pedro at palves dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 --- Comment #10 from Pedro Alves --- I've now compared GDB testsuite runs with current GCC, unpatched vs patched, no regressions.

[Bug libstdc++/103162] New: overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods

2021-11-09 Thread florin.iucha at amd dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162 Bug ID: 103162 Summary: overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource allocate/deallocate methods Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/103161] New: [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure

2021-11-09 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161 Bug ID: 103161 Summary: [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/103160] [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap

2021-11-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/103160] [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed at g:78dd0de956cbc5a021d3c5e3eb39308c3207936e

[Bug bootstrap/103160] [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/102957] [riscv64] ICE on bogus -march value

2021-11-09 Thread kito at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102957 --- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng --- Wait another week for make sure stable and backport to gcc-11 and gcc-10 branch.

[Bug bootstrap/103160] New: [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap

2021-11-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160 Bug ID: 103160 Summary: [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/102957] [riscv64] ICE on bogus -march value

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102957 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abe562bb01479ea2c8952ad98714f3225527aa7e commit r12-5062-gabe562bb01479ea2c8952ad98714f3225527aa7e Author: Kito Cheng Date: Mon Nov

[Bug libstdc++/103146] [12 Regression] libstdc++-v3 bootstrap failure on 32-bit BE powerpc since r12-4952

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/103146] [12 Regression] libstdc++-v3 bootstrap failure on 32-bit BE powerpc since r12-4952

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9ebf0ce0845046cdd0cb40c598072bd1d91362c commit r12-5057-gd9ebf0ce0845046cdd0cb40c598072bd1d91362c Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread pedro at palves dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 --- Comment #9 from Pedro Alves --- > 2021-11-09 Jakub Jelinek > > PR debug/101378 > * dwarf2out.c (field_byte_offset): Do the PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS > handling only for DECL_BIT_FIELD decls. > > ... > > fixes this for

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

2021-11-09 Thread mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 103159, which changed state. Bug 103159 Summary: Some -Wuninitialized warnings still depend on optimization level - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159 What|Removed |Add

[Bug c++/103159] Some -Wuninitialized warnings still depend on optimization level -

2021-11-09 Thread mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159 Mathieu Malaterre changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103159] -Wuninitialized should not depend on optimization level

2021-11-09 Thread mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159 --- Comment #3 from Mathieu Malaterre --- Please note that the documentation currently does not detail the need/impact of optimization for this flag: * https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wuninitialized Maybe just upd

[Bug c++/103159] -Wuninitialized should not depend on optimization level

2021-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24639 Summary|Some -Wuninit

[Bug debug/101473] debug_line info depends on toolchain path

2021-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread pedro at palves dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 --- Comment #8 from Pedro Alves --- Thank you, I missed the "same type" constraint. It's also mentioned at https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/attributes/no_unique_address . Indeed, if I use distinct empty types, GCC and Clang lay them

[Bug c++/103114] [12 Regression] ICE in build_complex, at tree.c:2470 since r12-4764-ga84b9d5373c7e67f

2021-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103114] [12 Regression] ICE in build_complex, at tree.c:2470 since r12-4764-ga84b9d5373c7e67f

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0318df0ae63e47f6b2f30e96205d00dcb3696538 commit r12-5054-g0318df0ae63e47f6b2f30e96205d00dcb3696538 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I must say I don't understand why we do that PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS stuff in dwarf2out.c (field_byte_offset) for non-bitfields, I don't understand why byte_position (decl) wouldn't work just fine. After

[Bug c++/103159] -Wuninitialized should not depend on optimization level

2021-11-09 Thread mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159 --- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre --- Just to be sure, here is the actual command I had been starring at for a while: ``` % g++ -o undef -fsanitize=undefined -Wuninitialized undef.cxx && ./undef 21845 ``` Maybe I got confused with `-fsanit

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/103159] New: -Wuninitialized should not depend on optimization level

2021-11-09 Thread mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159 Bug ID: 103159 Summary: -Wuninitialized should not depend on optimization level Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/85846] [Concepts] Concept as value in initializer: bogus declared-as-implicit-template error

2021-11-09 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/98394] Concept with auto... template parameter pack in if-statement causes compilation error

2021-11-09 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100652] Unexpanded parameter pack in partial specialization of variable template not rejected

2021-11-09 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98394] Concept with auto... template parameter pack in if-statement causes compilation error

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202 commit r12-5053-ga22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c++/85846] [Concepts] Concept as value in initializer: bogus declared-as-implicit-template error

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202 commit r12-5053-ga22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c++/100652] Unexpanded parameter pack in partial specialization of variable template not rejected

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a19f09cb03d7f69377e6d12162e5d6df78a82849 commit r12-5052-ga19f09cb03d7f69377e6d12162e5d6df78a82849 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug debug/103134] Redundant DW_AT_entry_pc tags for inlined functions

2021-11-09 Thread wcohen at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103134 --- Comment #2 from Will Cohen --- Filed a dwz bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28568) as an alternative was to address the redundant DW_AT_entry_pc.

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

2021-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc589cc7923b048b2722980cac69463b6f2e1941 commit r9-9820-gcc589cc7923b048b2722980cac69463b6f2e1941 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/103158] New: ICE on arithmetic with type parameter

2021-11-09 Thread b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103158 Bug ID: 103158 Summary: ICE on arithmetic with type parameter Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- ... and if the type is visible outside a single translation unit, then it needs to follow the layout mandated by the ABI anyway, or it would violate the One-Definition Rule.

[Bug debug/101378] Negative DW_AT_data_member_location

2021-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The C++ standard forbids two objects of the same type having the same address. That is true for the empty base-class optimization and it's true for [[no_unique_address]]. [intro.object] > Two objects wit

[Bug fortran/103154] Crashing gfortran due to bad type parameter specification since r8-3181-g87f3a5cfb59347cd

2021-11-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103154 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/103155] [12 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:813

2021-11-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/100253] [10 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp -ftree-slp-vectorize (unaligned movdqa)

2021-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] [10 Regression] A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

2021-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102714] [10 Regression] A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d016315a95cf4d9b72ee8f299e466457ca154b3 commit r10-10262-g8d016315a95cf4d9b72ee8f299e466457ca154b3 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

2021-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8311f59c6e2fa1f5aacc3da5e95739886ebdee7 commit r10-10261-ge8311f59c6e2fa1f5aacc3da5e95739886ebdee7 Author: Richard Bien

  1   2   >