https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
Bastiaan Braams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b.j.braams at cwi dot nl
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Martin,
I think we can close this (possibly adding the testcase)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164
Bug ID: 103164
Summary: -fipa-pta degrades aliasing oracle for tramp3d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84008
Bastiaan Braams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b.j.braams at cwi dot nl
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103158
Bastiaan Braams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83762
Bastiaan Braams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b.j.braams at cwi dot nl
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103154
Bastiaan Braams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b879d40a17ec0409f1a2cd9ab6134bb28f53eea8
commit r12-5079-gb879d40a17ec0409f1a2cd9ab6134bb28f53eea8
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103077
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103151
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
vpcmov can be extended to V8HF/V16HF under TARGET_XOP, i'm testing a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101917
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[11/12 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230
commit r12-5078-g52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> I am able to reproduce this at r12-4982-g962ff7d2849 as described in the
> bug, trying to see if a latter revision fixed the problem.
It is also broken at r12-4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56189
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59702
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163
Bug ID: 103163
Summary: stack_limit_rtx is created too early
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am able to reproduce this at r12-4982-g962ff7d2849 as described in the bug,
trying to see if a latter revision fixed the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800
--- Comment #6 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
at least a few down with r12-5073:
== LEAK SUMMARY:
-==definitely lost: 9,471 bytes in 14 blocks
-==indirectly lost: 18,267 bytes in 364 blocks
+==definitely lost: 6,472 bytes in 8 bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah. If we change the wording, we should change it consistently, and perhaps
it would be useful to do that because the current wording suggests only a
single pair of -std= options, while we mean that level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm afraid "only available with" is the customary form we use throughout the
front end, so in the patch I'm just sticking to that form.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
--- Comment #2 from W E Brown ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Patch on review.
In the proposed patch, I respectfully recommend a slight rewording of the new
pedwarn messages in gcc/cp/semantics.c and gcc/cp/typeck2.c:
eithe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #31 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661
commit r12-5073-g8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661
Author: Bernhard Reut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661
commit r12-5073-g8875a92d31329ae52b734683784c4b054839a661
Author: Bernhard Reutn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103148
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think it's exactly those changes which have caused this FAIL. See PR
libstdc++/103133 (which I have a patch for, and which fixes this).
Is everybody seeing this FAIL using glibc 2.34?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
It ICEs on both my machines, but I cannot reproduce it on godbolt. Give me some
time to see if I manage to get something meaningful out of it w/ gdb.
% gcc-12.0.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103145
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|False positive of |[11 Regression] bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103145
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0, 12.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101919
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||97048
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103152
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa
commit r12-5071-gf7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10352
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa
commit r12-5071-gf7844b6a777cb47fec7208d7bd594f6ce66f1daa
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Florin Iucha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.2.0, 12.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103158
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on arithmetic with type |[PDT] ICE on arithmetic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103154
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Crashing gfortran due to|[PDT] Crashing gfortran due
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631
n60wb42d2 at relay dot firefox.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n60wb42d2 at relay do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6)
>
> If it's reliably reproducible (ideally with a cross), can you attach a
> translation unit and the options to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
"A derived class shall implement this function to return a pointer to allocated
storage (6.7.5.5.2) with a size of at least bytes, aligned to the specified
alignment."
And 6.7.5.5.2 says:
"An allocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I suspect the same underlying issue is affecting the test on line #243 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #10 from Pedro Alves ---
I've now compared GDB testsuite runs with current GCC, unpatched vs patched, no
regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Bug ID: 103162
Summary: overconstrained std::pmr::memory_resource
allocate/deallocate methods
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Bug ID: 103161
Summary: [12 Regression] Better ranges cause
builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed at g:78dd0de956cbc5a021d3c5e3eb39308c3207936e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102957
--- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng ---
Wait another week for make sure stable and backport to gcc-11 and gcc-10
branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160
Bug ID: 103160
Summary: [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102957
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abe562bb01479ea2c8952ad98714f3225527aa7e
commit r12-5062-gabe562bb01479ea2c8952ad98714f3225527aa7e
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Mon Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9ebf0ce0845046cdd0cb40c598072bd1d91362c
commit r12-5057-gd9ebf0ce0845046cdd0cb40c598072bd1d91362c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #9 from Pedro Alves ---
> 2021-11-09 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR debug/101378
> * dwarf2out.c (field_byte_offset): Do the PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS
> handling only for DECL_BIT_FIELD decls.
>
> ...
>
> fixes this for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 103159, which changed state.
Bug 103159 Summary: Some -Wuninitialized warnings still depend on optimization
level -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159
Mathieu Malaterre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
Please note that the documentation currently does not detail the need/impact of
optimization for this flag:
* https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wuninitialized
Maybe just upd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
Summary|Some -Wuninit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #8 from Pedro Alves ---
Thank you, I missed the "same type" constraint. It's also mentioned at
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/attributes/no_unique_address .
Indeed, if I use distinct empty types, GCC and Clang lay them
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0318df0ae63e47f6b2f30e96205d00dcb3696538
commit r12-5054-g0318df0ae63e47f6b2f30e96205d00dcb3696538
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I must say I don't understand why we do that PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS stuff in
dwarf2out.c (field_byte_offset) for non-bitfields, I don't understand why
byte_position (decl) wouldn't work just fine. After
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
Just to be sure, here is the actual command I had been starring at for a while:
```
% g++ -o undef -fsanitize=undefined -Wuninitialized undef.cxx && ./undef
21845
```
Maybe I got confused with `-fsanit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103159
Bug ID: 103159
Summary: -Wuninitialized should not depend on optimization
level
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202
commit r12-5053-ga22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202
commit r12-5053-ga22d910305a5232694ff48ead37a7f53e46b7202
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100652
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a19f09cb03d7f69377e6d12162e5d6df78a82849
commit r12-5052-ga19f09cb03d7f69377e6d12162e5d6df78a82849
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103134
--- Comment #2 from Will Cohen ---
Filed a dwz bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28568) as an
alternative was to address the redundant DW_AT_entry_pc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc589cc7923b048b2722980cac69463b6f2e1941
commit r9-9820-gcc589cc7923b048b2722980cac69463b6f2e1941
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103158
Bug ID: 103158
Summary: ICE on arithmetic with type parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
... and if the type is visible outside a single translation unit, then it needs
to follow the layout mandated by the ABI anyway, or it would violate the
One-Definition Rule.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The C++ standard forbids two objects of the same type having the same address.
That is true for the empty base-class optimization and it's true for
[[no_unique_address]].
[intro.object]
> Two objects wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d016315a95cf4d9b72ee8f299e466457ca154b3
commit r10-10262-g8d016315a95cf4d9b72ee8f299e466457ca154b3
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8311f59c6e2fa1f5aacc3da5e95739886ebdee7
commit r10-10261-ge8311f59c6e2fa1f5aacc3da5e95739886ebdee7
Author: Richard Bien
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo