https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, it's a bit unclear. My reading is that neither is an allocation function,
it's just referring to [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation] for the definition of
"allocated storage". Although arguably the non-null requirement only applies to
allocated storage returned by "a replaceable allocation function".
I'll ask the C++ committee for clarification.
