https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-10
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Skipping mode TI for zero_extend lowering.
Splitting mode TI for ashift lowering with shift amounts =
Splitting mode TI for lshiftrt lowering with shift amounts =
Splitting mode TI for ashiftrt lowering with shift amounts =
All these should be fixed. But it is a red herring here, since the shift we
have is in DImode already anyway, not TImode.
Confirmed btw.
