[Bug middle-end/40028] RFE - Add GPU acceleration library to gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40028 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC supports offloading to some GPUs now. I don't know if this enough to close this bug though. It has support this feature for a few years now too.

[Bug middle-end/48439] gcc fails to resume the normal treatment when -isystem has finished

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48439 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|driver |middle-end Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/48027] setmem pattern using undesirable RTL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48027 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com --- Comment #31 fr

[Bug plugins/45346] hard-reg-set.h needs to be in the plugin include directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/46143] __attribute__((optimize)) emits wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46143 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/45478] __attribute__((__target__())) causes crashes at various places

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Keywords|

[Bug c/45881] bit offset of bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45881 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/65373] [SH] Implement bit counting built-in functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65373 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug target/65266] [SH] Use rotcl for bit reversals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65266 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug preprocessor/31186] -I/usr/include not taken into account

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31186 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/31763] cc1plus fails to find some headers when include paths are duplicated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/31763] cc1plus fails to find some headers when include paths are duplicated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31763 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #2) > This is user error setting environment variables in a way that interferes > with the ordering of the compiler's internal directories. However, I'm > not sure i

[Bug target/39123] x86-32 asm *(a+b) input causes out of registers above -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39123 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/36735] incomplete tree dump with "-fdump-tree-original-raw"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36735 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/96309] Substitution failure doesn't propagate through the typename of a template value parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96309 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71954] template partial specialization for constexpr error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71954 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug c++/71954] template partial specialization for constexpr error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71954 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/90031] Bogus parse error trying to explicitly specialize a template variable inside class scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90031 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/39906] Accepted invalid member template specialization in derived class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39906 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Even more shocking this works on all compilers: int t1; Derived::Kind::type &t = t1; Base::Kind::type &t2 = t1;

[Bug c++/67228] Template partial ordering failure ambiguous overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67228 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/58354] variadic template ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vexocide at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/59135] Incorrect ambiguity in constexpr function overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59135 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58354] variadic template ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oknenavin at outlook dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/90642] g++ fails to resolve template function overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90642 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58354] variadic template ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lumosimann at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/89085] call of overload is ambiguous with parameter packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89085 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58354] variadic template ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbock at eudoxos dot de --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/77449] False ambiguity for variadic function with non-deduced template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77449 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/89156] Templated member function has DEFAULT visibility although instantiating class has not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89156 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-28 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/102105] x86_64: ABI break with vector in union and -mno-mmx -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102105 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |9.4.1 Summary|[10/11/12 Regression

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to ensadc from comment #4) > Further reduced: > > template < int > struct b { }; > template < typename n > struct g { > typedef b< sizeof(n) > l; > }; > template < typename h, typename = typenam

[Bug c++/89299] __attribute__ cleanup does not accept template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89299 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- The issue is we don't do any overload resolution for the function in cleanup attribute; most likely because the attribute was originally added for C. Also in C++ you could just use a wrapper class to do the

[Bug c++/98637] Changing active union member via assignment expression should require trivial default constructor in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98637 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/100490] gcc 11.1.0 hangs forever while building its own libstdc++ (c++17 floating_from_chars.cc) on aarch64 linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100490 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/99901] [9 Regression] static const class var implemented with constexpr doesn't emit symbols in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m101010a at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/90161] GCC does not always dllexport constexpr member variables in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90161 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 96182, which changed state. Bug 96182 Summary: GCC accepts constexpr function with no return-statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96182 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/96182] GCC accepts constexpr function with no return-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96182 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||55004 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 93668, which changed state. Bug 93668 Summary: constexpr delete[] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93668 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/95808] Can mismatch non-array new/delete with array new/delete during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95808 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/93668] constexpr delete[]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93668 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90814] gcc accept invalid constexpr defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90814 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-01-28 00:00:00 |2021-8-27 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c++/88201] lambda function fails to compile, when deactivated by a constexpr and deduced return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 54483, which changed state. Bug 54483 Summary: undefined reference to static constexpr in .so https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/54483] undefined reference to static constexpr in .so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80507] [C++17] static variable definition not emitted with -std=c++1z when defined as constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80507 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > This is a dup of bug 99901. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99901 *** I should say it will be fixed for 10.4.0 and GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/99901] [9 Regression] static const class var implemented with constexpr doesn't emit symbols in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge.

[Bug c++/80507] [C++17] static variable definition not emitted with -std=c++1z when defined as constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80507 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/102112] New: Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 Bug ID: 102112 Summary: Cannot associate with component of associate target Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/90189] Spurious "error: parameter packs not expanded" when a dependent name coincides

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90189 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.poelen at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/100718] parameter packs not expanded error with a type member which has the same name as a pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100718 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/102097] Error in selecting more specialized function in case of ambiguity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/102111] Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102111 --- Comment #2 from Brad Richardson --- Thanks for the for the confirmation. Glad to hear it is fixed in later versions.

[Bug libfortran/102111] Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102111 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/83143] [SH]: Assembler messages: invalid operands (*UND* and .text sections) for `-'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83143 --- Comment #16 from Giulio Benetti --- Thank you. Yes I've just tested "-freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple" solution of gcc 9.x and 11.x with -Os enabled and it works perfectly. By the way, is it useful for you if I provide .i and .s file with -

[Bug c++/89580] overload resolution for pointers fails to consider conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89580 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/102111] New: Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102111 Bug ID: 102111 Summary: Segfault with associate to derived type with allocatable component Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89287] [n3323] Array declaration fails to use template conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89287 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks like only part of n3323 was implemented.

[Bug c++/89287] [n3323] Array declaration fails to use template conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89287 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Array declaration fails to |[n3323] Array declaration

[Bug c/101766] Microblaze gcc misses symver but __has_attribute(symver) returns true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/102110] microblaze-linux doesn't use elfos.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/89287] Array declaration fails to use template conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89287 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/102110] New: microblaze-linux doesn't use elfos.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110 Bug ID: 102110 Summary: microblaze-linux doesn't use elfos.h Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/102109] New: Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 Bug ID: 102109 Summary: Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/89050] [8 Regression] GCC sometimes requires this to be captured when doing overload resolution but selecting a static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89050 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC sometimes requires this |[8 Regression] GCC |to

[Bug target/102105] [10/11/12 Regression] x86_64: ABI break with vector in union and -mno-mmx -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102105 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83143] [SH]: Assembler messages: invalid operands (*UND* and .text sections) for `-'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83143 --- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Giulio Benetti from comment #14) > This bug still shows up in gcc version 9.x and 11.x. But not on version 10.x > I've found the simple work-around to disable the optimization(overri

[Bug c++/102092] [C++2b] Passing argument to auto template parameter modifies the value of argument inside function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102092 --- Comment #3 from David Friberg --- (In reply to David Friberg from comment #2) > I believe your program has UB as it contains an odr-violation due to the > friend declaration of the stream operator function , as its in-class > definition ("hi

[Bug target/102108] New: [meta] ABI change due to SSE emulation of MMX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102108 Bug ID: 102108 Summary: [meta] ABI change due to SSE emulation of MMX Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/83143] [SH]: Assembler messages: invalid operands (*UND* and .text sections) for `-'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83143 --- Comment #14 from Giulio Benetti --- This bug still shows up in gcc version 9.x and 11.x. But not on version 10.x I've found the simple work-around to disable the optimization(override CFLAGS with -O0) and it works.

[Bug c++/102092] [C++2b] Passing argument to auto template parameter modifies the value of argument inside function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102092 David Friberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davveston at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/86431] defining static member cannot be used in sizeof/decltype while initializing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86431 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-07-07 00:00:00 |2021-8-27 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug target/102107] protocol register (r12) corrupted before a tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107 --- Comment #2 from Paul Clarke --- Created attachment 51369 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51369&action=edit creduced version (tiny, but ugly)

[Bug target/102107] protocol register (r12) corrupted before a tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107 Paul Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51367|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/102107] New: protocol register (r12) corrupted before a tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107 Bug ID: 102107 Summary: protocol register (r12) corrupted before a tail call Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libfortran/102106] New: Intermittent Segfault with associate to derived type with polymorphic component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106 Bug ID: 102106 Summary: Intermittent Segfault with associate to derived type with polymorphic component Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/58820] lambda multiple inheritance operator() not ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Blocks|54367

[Bug fortran/99819] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_defer_symbol_init, at fortran/trans-decl.c:841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99819 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/64228] compile error not accurate expected ; before string constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64228 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90189] Spurious "error: parameter packs not expanded" when a dependent name coincides

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90189 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://godbolt.org/z/UuwYK | |4

[Bug target/102105] [10/11/12 Regression] x86_64: ABI break with vector in union and -mno-mmx -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102105 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- diff between r271212 and r271213: $ diff -up ~/y12.s ~/y13.s --- /home/mpolacek/y12.s2021-08-27 16:25:46.0 -0400 +++ /home/mpolacek/y13.s2021-08-27 16:25:53.0 -0400 @@ -87,8

[Bug c++/64228] compile error not accurate expected ; before string constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64228 --- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The trunk show: > : In function 'int main()': > :7:30: error: expected ';' before string constant > 7 | std::cout << "oops " << i " number" << endl; >

[Bug c++/79094] Pack expansion in using-declaration rejects an attempt to inherit a pack of constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79094 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed in GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/79094] Pack expansion in using-declaration rejects an attempt to inherit a pack of constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79094 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug target/102105] [10/11/12 Regression] x86_64: ABI break with vector in union and -mno-mmx -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102105 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Keywords|

[Bug target/102105] New: x86_64: ABI break with vector in union and -mno-mmx -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102105 Bug ID: 102105 Summary: x86_64: ABI break with vector in union and -mno-mmx -mavx Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/102104] New: parameter packs not expanded with '...' for operator conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102104 Bug ID: 102104 Summary: parameter packs not expanded with '...' for operator conversions Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/87737] ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in remap_gimple_op_r, at tree-inline.c:923

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87737 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|u

[Bug c++/82478] Rejects valid access to private member type that should be allowed by friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0 --- Comment #7 from Andre

[Bug c++/83470] [7 Regression] Type morphing nested lambda capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83470 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Summary|Type morphing n

[Bug c++/71546] lambda capture fails with "was not declared in this scope"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71546 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandr.kolesov at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/83115] Capturing the local variable/function parameter by value generates a compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83115 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/82756] Poor error message from control flow at global scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82756 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-10-28 00:00:00 |2021-8-27 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/78704] operator-> pointer return type is not recognized as pointer type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78704 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/78704] operator-> pointer return type is not recognized as pointer type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78704 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at baszerr dot eu --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c++/81182] result of ‘operator->()’ yields non-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60815] prologue line is wrong for templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60815 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|Inconsistent prol

[Bug c/102103] missing warning for arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/62165] Misleading error messages when using "impossible" brace initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62165 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2014-08-1

  1   2   >