https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Blocks|54367 |
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unrelated to lambdas really. Here is a C++98 code which shows the same issue
with clang:
template<class t>
struct i
{
t operator()(t i);
};
struct overload_set1 : i<int>, i<double>
{
overload_set1() {}
};
int main(void)
{
double d1 = 10;
overload_set1 tt;
tt(d1);
}
To make the original code work (you need C++17 really):
Adding
using Fs::operator()...;
allows GCC (and ICC) to work.
So this is a bug in clang.
I don't think we need a testcase as we must likely already have a C++98 one
even.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
[Bug 54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions
