https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79094
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |11.1.0
Known to fail| |10.3.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to lucdanton from comment #1)
> Another case that wants a dependent type expanded alongside the bases, but
> where
> the declarator does not name a constructor:
I filed that as PR 102104 because it is unrelated to the original testcase
which has been fixed for GCC 11.
