https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95760
Bug ID: 95760
Summary: ivopts with loop variables
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95759
Bug ID: 95759
Summary: Sized deallocation function can not be matched
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95758
Bug ID: 95758
Summary: -Wanalyzer-use-after-free false positive when
compiling glibc regex.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95683
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
--- Comment #23 from Alexander Egorenkov ---
I would gladly if i understood the real problem. Sorry i'm not very familiar
with config.guess & config.sub. Could you please elaborate what the problem is
and how it should be fixed ? Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757
Bug ID: 95757
Summary: [11 regression] missing warning in
gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94458
eggert at cs dot ucla.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95756
Bug ID: 95756
Summary: Failure to optimize memory operations with _Complex
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95755
Bug ID: 95755
Summary: GCC 10.1.0 reports bogus sizes in
-Werror=format-truncation= error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95754
Bug ID: 95754
Summary: Failure to optimize __builtin_ia32_cmpb512_mask with
anded first operand, 0 second operand and neq
operation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95568
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #6 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
Also, I think (%%rsp) can be rather far from the top of the stack if the stack
frame is large. This may mean it's less likely to be in data cache. Having a
dummy variable ensures that it is close to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #5 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
> Please also read [1] why we avoid -4(%%esp).
I believe, memcheck would complain because the value at -4(%%rsp) would be
uninitialized. This is unfortunate. The workaround could be to initialize it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95568
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95753
Bug ID: 95753
Summary: ICE when building the Linux Kernel for ARM64 (internal
compiler error: ‘global_options’ are modified in local
context)
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> How about the following patch:
Surely, mfence_nosse needs to be enabled also for
TARGET_USE_XCHG_FOR_ATOMIC_STORE.
> This will generate "lock orl $0, (%rsp)" instea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
How about the following patch:
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sync.md b/gcc/config/i386/sync.md
index 9ab5456b227..7d9442d45b7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/sync.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/sync.md
@@ -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92814
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69698
Bug 69698 depends on bug 92814, which changed state.
Bug 92814 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow writing into a dynamically
allocated flexible array member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92814
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 92814, which changed state.
Bug 92814 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow writing into a dynamically
allocated flexible array member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92814
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95752
Bug ID: 95752
Summary: Failure to optimize complicated usage of __builtin_ctz
with conditionals properly
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > But if they mangle differently, then structural_comptypes shouldn't treat
> > them as same types.
Definite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95751
Bug ID: 95751
Summary: [aarch64] Consider using ldapr for
__atomic_load_n(acquire) on ARMv8.3-RCPC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95568
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #2 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
gcc 10.1 only optimizes __atomic_store_n(seq_cst) to xchg, but not the fence.
Also, consider applying the same optimization to __sync_synchronize().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||91719
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
Bug ID: 95750
Summary: [x86] Use dummy atomic insn instead of mfence in
__atomic_thread_fence(seq_cst)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95745
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95745
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-18
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alexander Egorenkov from comment #21)
> Could you please point me to the bug report it was moved to ? Thanks
Can you file it? Well they don't have a bug database, just an email list:
Report bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95749
Bug ID: 95749
Summary: std::filesystem::file_size returns wrong size for
large files on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92814
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5acc654e380797bbf402bc3a0a67f9a6ac4c2a83
commit r11-1517-g5acc654e380797bbf402bc3a0a67f9a6ac4c2a83
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95667
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5acc654e380797bbf402bc3a0a67f9a6ac4c2a83
commit r11-1517-g5acc654e380797bbf402bc3a0a67f9a6ac4c2a83
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95748
Bug ID: 95748
Summary: Long long function parameter should be aligned to 32
bit on x86.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Egorenkov ---
Could you please point me to the bug report it was moved to ? Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95747
Bug ID: 95747
Summary: [OpenMP/Builtin] nontemporal store support
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
--- Comment #20 from Alexander Egorenkov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #19)
> This is a config.sub issue where the vendor is always rest/set to ibm. Not
> directly a gcc issue. Gcc does not maintain config.sub.
Ok, sorry, thank yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Dunno, perhaps for backporting it could be done in template_args_equal instead?
Like I said, it would probably need to handle also POINTER/REFERENCE/ARRAY_TYPE
whose ultimate element type is VECTOR_TYPE possi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95746
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
The bug doesn't seem to occur on raspberry pi 4, with config string
arm-linux-gnueabihf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95746
Bug ID: 95746
Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: reassoc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71096
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95722
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
See bugs 70490 and 84563 regarding atomic_load of const.
The atomic_load generic function takes a pointer-to-const-atomic argument
just like any other library function that takes an argumen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> But if they mangle differently, then structural_comptypes shouldn't treat
> them as same types.
That certainly avoids the ICE, and makes GCC's beha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95347
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Aaron Sawdey
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e81b0cf4ff75f65edfd2d83bfa2933f35ae66af
commit r10-8325-g6e81b0cf4ff75f65edfd2d83bfa2933f35ae66af
Author: Aaron Sawdey
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95347
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Aaron Sawdey
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:541e8c4dac11fce933a7f9fa7d865abf8d6496f7
commit r10-8324-g541e8c4dac11fce933a7f9fa7d865abf8d6496f7
Author: Aaron Sawdey
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95735
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95735
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5421fae8b17c7401f3a4ac5b9f414a47f7bda379
commit r11-1516-g5421fae8b17c7401f3a4ac5b9f414a47f7bda379
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95736
Lewis Baker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lewissbaker.opensource@gmai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95667
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95735
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95744
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95745
Bug ID: 95745
Summary: [11 regression] O3-pr85794.c fails since
r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #8)
> I've noticed regressions caused by make_more_copies, in scenarios that used
> subreg s for the low part of promoted incoming parms. With hard regs, the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95744
Bug ID: 95744
Summary: Duplicate error message in a simple decltype specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95734
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743
Bug ID: 95743
Summary: [9/10 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive
procedure with -fcheck=recursion
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95741
--- Comment #3 from Marc POULHIÈS ---
Yes you are right, sorry. Mistake caused by previous change in the title...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67282
Marc POULHIÈS changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpoulhies at kalray dot eu
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95741
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I assume the bug summary is a typo, and you meant to say "Optimization skips
destructor and calls terminate directly", right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95735
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95741
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95742
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #0)
> This code test.cc, I think it's not a garbage input for GCC,
That's debatable.
> I guess GCC might can not recognize the function definition correctly?
That's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95730
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Stubbs ---
The GCN port does not define a scalar_mode_supported, and I think the default
definition is allowing TImode (as long long int). As I said, the SLP
fake-vector load/store use it fine as a substitute for V4SI o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95742
Bug ID: 95742
Summary: Bad error message in parsing a function with
"decltype()"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95739
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eccc3d432669ba272229d49f015cb986df21eb0a
commit r11-1510-geccc3d432669ba272229d49f015cb986df21eb0a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95734
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95728
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
Alexander Egorenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95728
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81caacc273399c91ae3182021ad87bc2ba786039
commit r11-1507-g81caacc273399c91ae3182021ad87bc2ba786039
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95741
Bug ID: 95741
Summary: Optimization removes call to set_terminate in
destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95724
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > Note the testcase does not ICE so ice-on-invalid is wrong. It's really
> > a diagnostic only. If we want sth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95724
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Note the testcase does not ICE so ice-on-invalid is wrong. It's really
> a diagnostic only. If we want sth extra to distinguish error diagnostics
> from warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95659
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #0)
> $cat bug.cc
> int a;
> long foo1 ( void = a, double param2 ,decltype (auto) param3 = a){ }
> long foo2 ( void = a, double param2){ }
>
> In gcc-trunk
> $g++-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #7)
> By the way, can you take a look at bug 95597 and bug 95659? I think GCC
> should accept the first case and shouldn't miss the error message in the
> second code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95597
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #6)
> Hi, there.
>
> I hold the view that the compiler should have good fault tolerance, which
> means giving an input(even invalid), the compiler might emit appropriate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94735
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94959
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95740
Bug ID: 95740
Summary: Failure to avoid using the stack when interpreting a
float as an integer when it is modified afterwards
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95713
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c7d18d51a8e9abd085afd0b01743662fd0419fa
commit r10-8323-g0c7d18d51a8e9abd085afd0b01743662fd0419fa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95699
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e0f4a18bc978c73624dd016e4cce229c2809c9c
commit r11-1504-g2e0f4a18bc978c73624dd016e4cce229c2809c9c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95713
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a875db43cd4210843c480c8df26a1d6624d057d
commit r11-1503-g9a875db43cd4210843c480c8df26a1d6624d057d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
.section.rodata.cst8,"aM",@progbits,8
.align 8
.LC4:
.long 0
.long -1074790400
- .ident "GCC: (SUSE Linux) 10.1.1 20200507 [revision
dd38686d9c810cecbaa80bb82ed91caaa58ad635]"
+ .ident "GCC: (GNU) 11.0.0 20200618 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95739
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95738
Bug ID: 95738
Summary: Failure to optimize comparison of float after sign xor
to unsigned comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712
--- Comment #17 from Alexander Egorenkov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #11)
> > > generated for aarch64-linux-gnu that I configured for and it has:
> >
> > You have used --disable-boo
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
