https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #7) > By the way, can you take a look at bug 95597 and bug 95659? I think GCC > should accept the first case and shouldn't miss the error message in the > second code. > Those cases are different from this report. I've confirmed bug 95597, that's a real bug. Bug 95659 is just more garbage.
