https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95741
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I assume the bug summary is a typo, and you meant to say "Optimization skips destructor and calls terminate directly", right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95741
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I assume the bug summary is a typo, and you meant to say "Optimization skips destructor and calls terminate directly", right?