https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997
Bug ID: 79997
Summary: simple-ssa-sprintf i18n: wrong plural form in
maybe_warn
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 11, 2017 12:39:38 AM GMT+01:00, "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
>
>--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
>On the one hand, I wou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The following fixes the warning for me:
diff --git a/libgfortran/m4/reshape.m4 b/libgfortran/m4/reshape.m4
index 787844ec42d..42379d58a29 100644
--- a/libgfortran/m4/reshape.m4
+++ b/libgfortran/m4/re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #19 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The reshape issue also happens with -O2.
Thomas the issue is easily reproducible with a stage-1 cross
(--target=powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu) and the attached testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79848
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79848
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Mar 11 01:57:11 2017
New Revision: 246068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246068&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Simplify uses of "%<%s%>" to "%qs" (PR translation/79848)
gcc/c-family
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79923
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79923
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Mar 11 01:43:48 2017
New Revision: 246067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove trailing period from various diagnostic messages (PR translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79925
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79925
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Mar 11 01:40:04 2017
New Revision: 246066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
aarch64.c: tweaks to quoting in error messages (PR target/79925)
gcc/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
Bug ID: 79996
Summary: spurious -Wreturn-type on a function that calls a
noreturn function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79848
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79926
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79926
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79995
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
On the one hand, I would like to see that libgfortran can be
compiled on any platform.
On the other hand, the options that I currently see (such as making
the for loop into a do/while loop, pre-initializing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79995
Bug ID: 79995
Summary: Messages for iWMMXt builtins could use some cleanup
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79994
Bug ID: 79994
Summary: Concepts technical specification
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79991
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] Infinite |[5/6 Regression] Infinite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Mar 10 21:17:13 2017
New Revision: 246059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/78911
* lra-assigns.c (must_not_spil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15)
> Created attachment 40944 [details]
> Patch for reshape
>
> Does this fix the issues in reshape?
No. The warning happens on line 266 and you patch change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
--- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Mar 10 20:53:18 2017
New Revision: 246058
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246058&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-03-10 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 40944
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40944&action=edit
Patch for reshape
Does this fix the issues in reshape?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79985
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fails with -O2 -fselective-scheduling -mcpu=power8; also on BE, does not
fail with power7. Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #12 from Yanai ---
It took me 5 minutes to guess that it polluted my home folder, but thanks
anyway.
More semi-on-topic: I have another potential bug (aside 4 others), the bug
is that the compiler says there's no ::type in enable_if,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Bug ID: 79993
Summary: ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7344
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Yanai from comment #8)
> Even though I don't understand this low level prints of GCC (which I
> interested in how you got them),
> can you tell me how in a manner I can understand how that point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #9 from Yanai ---
I don't mean step by step, but in which statement I created that lambda's
storage and destroyed it, and between used it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #8 from Yanai ---
Even though I don't understand this low level prints of GCC (which I interested
in how you got them),
can you tell me how in a manner I can understand how that pointer
pointed to an automatic storage (I assume)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
[t1.cc:10:9] MEM[(struct &)[t1.cc:17:42] &D.35987] ={v} {CLOBBER};
[t1.cc:10:47] [t1.cc:10:47] MEM[(struct __lambda0 *)&D.35987] = 1;
[t1.cc:10:47] [t1.cc:10:47] D.35987.v = [t1.cc:24:29] &[t1.cc:24:20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
MEM[(struct &)&D.35987] ={v} {CLOBBER};
MEM[(struct __lambda0 *)&D.35987] = 1;
D.35987.v = &MEM[(const struct __lambda0 *)&D.35987].__i;
D.35988 = D.35987;
D.35987 ={v} {CLOBBER};
_2 = MEM[(const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #5 from Yanai ---
but if I still hold the lambda locally,
shouldn't it point to inside the lambda's storage?
See that I still hold no_pie_2 when accessing the variable that I got from it's
lambda object.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
static auto get_wrapped_number() {
return [i = 1] { return &i; };
}
This seems like you could reference a variable which has gone out of scope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
Yanai Eliyahu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yanai.eli11 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you try -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=undefined ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79511
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And this is the fix for comment 3:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/codecvt.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/codecvt.cc
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ namespace
{
static_assert(sizeof(C) >= 2, "a code unit must b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
Bug ID: 79992
Summary: accessing storage member of lambda via pointer with
-no-pie causes the next function to overwrite the
pointer's data
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992
--- Comment #1 from Yanai Eliyahu ---
Created attachment 40943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40943&action=edit
the .cpp that has the bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79981
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 10 19:47:44 2017
New Revision: 246054
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246054&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79981
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_bas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 10 19:42:46 2017
New Revision: 246053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246053&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-10 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/79956
* m4/i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79875
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79875
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 10 19:22:35 2017
New Revision: 246047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246047&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing punctuation to message (PR driver/79875)
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79921
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79921
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 10 19:09:02 2017
New Revision: 246045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
c-indentation.c: workaround xgettext limitation (PR c/79921)
gcc/c-fam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It does!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I was just about to test it... Results shortly :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed by r246044.
Jeff: does this fix the issue you mentioned in comment #2?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79511
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is the fix for comment 9:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/codecvt.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/codecvt.cc
@@ -1483,7 +1483,11 @@ do_in(state_type&, const extern_type* __from, const
extern_typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79991
Bug ID: 79991
Summary: typo in params.def,
PARAM_VECT_MAX_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 10 18:39:52 2017
New Revision: 246044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix out-of-bounds write in RTL function reader (PR bootstrap/79952)
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79985
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 10 17:35:54 2017
New Revision: 246042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79960 - alias templates and partial ordering
* pt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79967
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> It seems to be valid, clang++ accepts it and G++ too (with my patch).
I don't have a strong opinion whether this should or should not be accepted but
in comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
--- Comment #6 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Do you really need even the zlib.def change?
For standalone zlib, yes; if you try to export a symbol which doesn't exist, ld
errors out.
> That part has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390x-*-*, powerpc*-*-*,|s390x-*-*, powerpc*-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79941
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79941
--- Comment #2 from Will Schmidt ---
Author: willschm
Date: Fri Mar 10 16:18:44 2017
New Revision: 246040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246040&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2017-03-10 Will Schmidt
PR target/79941
* config/rs60
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79185
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79896
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79967
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 10 15:36:00 2017
New Revision: 246039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79967
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Check ATTRLIST
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79967
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
--- Comment #21 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed two ways to fix this on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00535.html
(I have not yet looked at how much back-portable they are but I do not
expect any issues.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79899
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 10 15:33:04 2017
New Revision: 246038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79899
* optimize.c (maybe_thunk_body): Don't ICE if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79896
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 10 15:28:26 2017
New Revision: 246034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79896
* decl.c (finish_enum_value_list): If value i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79981
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> (simplify
> (convert @1)
> (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@1))
> && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> && (TREE_CODE (type) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
> || TY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Mar 10 15:23:06 2017
New Revision: 246032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246032&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
testsuite: attr-alloc_size-11.c (PR79356)
As stated in the PR (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Do you really need even the zlib.def change?
That part has been added 5 years ago, so it would surprise me if it didn't
build even with that.
If that works, the gzguts.h and zlib.h changes is something we can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79980
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Apparently so is min vs max:
maxcode = std::max(max_single_utf16_unit, maxcode);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79907
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79907
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Fri Mar 10 14:32:42 2017
New Revision: 246029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79907
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_init_hard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77509
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51350
Mic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micwinx at web dot de
--- Comment #2 from Mic ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so given we can't have PRE do as good as predcom and a "cost model" for PRE
is out of the question for GCC 7 the following dumbs down PRE again. It does
so in the very much simplest way rather than tryi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Anyway, as far as memory consumption goes (compile time is still the same), the
following patch helps a lot:
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2017-03-07 20:04:52.0 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 10 13:24:45 2017
New Revision: 246027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246027&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
MPX: Fix option handling.
2017-03-10 Martin Liska
PR target/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 10 13:24:45 2017
New Revision: 246027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246027&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
MPX: Fix option handling.
2017-03-10 Martin Liska
PR target/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
>
> --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> Yes, the merged is the issue, but looks it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79966
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79891
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, the merged is the issue, but looks it's created at the very beginning:
test.c.004t.gimple:
...
:
if (false_var != 0) goto ; else goto ;
:
ret = 111;
:
goto ;
:
ret = 999;
:
D.2320 = r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79956
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Again, changing loop exists from n == sdim to n >= sdim might help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79652
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
