http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55932
Bug #: 55932
Summary: DDT's default structure constructor does not work with
having allocatable member variables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unkno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel 2013-01-10
07:55:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29137
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29137
Experimental fix
This patch fixes the problem for me. I will use Aldys testcase when comi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-10
05:18:11 UTC ---
> std::integral_constant i; // This is not working
Most likely because Test is not complete at the time of parsing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Bug #: 55931
Summary: Constexpr member function inside a static member is
not working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-10
02:54:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 10 02:54:39 2013
New Revision: 195075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195075
Log:
PR c++/55878
* rtti.c (build_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55929
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-10
02:09:10 UTC ---
>/sandbox/gcc-git/libitm/beginend.cc:346:1: error: unable to generate reloads
Reload would not be able handle this either as it is jump_insn.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930
Bug #: 55930
Summary: libatomic build failure if configured with
--disable-dependency-tracking
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55929
Bug #: 55929
Summary: lra-constraints-ICE while xg++ compile libitm with -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55928
Bug #: 55928
Summary: m32c ICE building libgcc2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54338
Janis Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55913
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55927
Bug #: 55927
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-10.C -std=gnu++11
scan-ipa-dump-times inline "Discovered a virtual call
to a known target" 1
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey 2013-01-09 23:09:15
UTC ---
Here is a C++ test case in case it involves differences from the C examples.
This comes from libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/pointer_type_info.cc
% cat bug4.cc
namespace std
{
cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-09 22:51:36
UTC ---
The old BLOCK came from
(gdb) bt
#0 remap_block (block=0x7fffd690, id=0x7fffd840) at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:624
#1 0x009fe52a in remap_blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55926
Bug #: 55926
Summary: Internal compiler error with static volatile pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961
--- Comment #11 from Joseph S. Myers 2013-01-09
21:55:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 29133
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29133
More complicated fix for 4.6
The previous proposed patch breaks Thumb-2, because alignme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey 2013-01-09 21:52:59
UTC ---
Here is another testcase that looks different then the others, it is cutdown
from newlib/libm/math/k_rem_pio2.c.
% cat bug3.c
static const int init_jk[] = {2,3,4,6};
double
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09
21:29:14 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 9 21:29:07 2013
New Revision: 195067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195067
Log:
PR tree-optimization/55569
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #169 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09
21:22:33 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 9 21:22:26 2013
New Revision: 195066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195066
Log:
PR lto/45375
* ipa-inline.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #168 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09
21:20:46 UTC ---
Too bad :(
The patch should reduce memory usage, not increase it. So it must be something
else.
My build was around 7GB w/o PGO, I will need to try the PGO builds myself.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09
21:20:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I am still seeing some UNSPEC notes during my mipt-mti-elf build, here is a
> testcase cut down from newlib/libc/misc/init.c, (ps and pe were origin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2013-01-09 21:15:53
UTC ---
I am still seeing some UNSPEC notes during my mipt-mti-elf build, here is a
testcase cut down from newlib/libc/misc/init.c, (ps and pe were originally
__preinit_array_start and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-01-09 20:57:13 UTC ---
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916
>
> --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-09 20:39:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > OK, I've got a patch for this, but probably won't be able to test
> > it until the weekend.
>
> If you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-09 20:32:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 29132
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29132
prototype patch
Here's the current version of patch in case anyone wants to g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Last reconfirmed|2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey 2013-01-09 20:24:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> OK, I've got a patch for this, but probably won't be able to test
> it until the weekend.
If you want to attach it to this defect (or email it to me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47203
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-09
20:18:50 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Wed Jan 9 20:18:44 2013
New Revision: 195065
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195065
Log:
PR fortran/47203
* module.c (ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #167 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-01-09 19:58:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #166)
> Markus, the apperance of undefined references I fixed by patch above is highly
> sensitive to partitioning and inlining decision. Can you,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55925
Bug #: 55925
Summary: Unrecognized command line option '-mfxsr' when
building x86_64-w64-mingw32 native compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou 2013-01-09
19:17:00 UTC ---
> so
> [10] .init PROGBITS 00059c90 00059c90
> [12] .fini PROGBITS 000caec0 000caec0
> [18] .init_array I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-09
18:55:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 9 18:55:34 2013
New Revision: 195063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195063
Log:
PR c++/55893
* decl.c (cp_finis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-09
18:55:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 9 18:55:12 2013
New Revision: 195062
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195062
Log:
PR c++/55893
* decl.c (cp_finis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler
2013-01-09 18:43:52 UTC ---
Oops I failed to read the error description correctly. The compiler is correct,
so please declare this as INVALID. Sorry for the noise.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55114
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-09 18:37:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Remapped blocks are supposed to be linked into the BLOCK tree of the
It didn't happen.
> destination. What's the backtrace of this remap_block?
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler
2013-01-09 18:32:26 UTC ---
Remark: The noexcept specifier was added unintentionally and is not relevant to
reproduce the described problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924
Bug #: 55924
Summary: [C++11] Not all copy-assignment operator forms are
correctly detected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener 2013-01-09
18:20:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> The BLOCK tree node is cleared by
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00336b4882ee in __memset_sse2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1 0x00545fdf in c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55923
Bug #: 55923
Summary: tree passes pessimize complex load/store operations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: misse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55114
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-09 18:19:29 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jan 9 18:19:16 2013
New Revision: 195060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195060
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55811
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-01-09
18:15:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> gcc now generates:
>
> movqp1(%rip), %r12 # 56*movdi_internal_rex64/2 [length = 7]
> movq%r12, (%rsp)# 57*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-09 17:52:19
UTC ---
gcc now generates:
movqp1(%rip), %r12 # 56*movdi_internal_rex64/2 [length = 7]
movq%r12, (%rsp)# 57*movdi_internal_rex64/4 [length = 4]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #1 from nicolas.cavallari at lri dot fr 2013-01-09 17:42:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 29129
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29129
same source with more outputs.
Example output of what i have on my system w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
--- Comment #8 from Oleh Derevenko 2013-01-09
17:42:19 UTC ---
And go on telling your tales about numerous optimizations that affect argument
count on stack and cleanup size of final 'ret'...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Bug #: 55922
Summary: brace initializing parent cause bogus virtual base
constructor calls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55918
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Ringström 2013-01-09
17:39:20 UTC ---
Yes, I want 'bad_guy' to be in the backtrace, so you are correct that I don't
want the stack to be unwound at all, but unfortunately it is. It seems to be
because of the Foo objec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #33 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 17:27:18 UTC
---
Ok,. thats 4.8.0 (gcc-trunk) rebuilt and tested.. fails
bash-4.2# g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/sparc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
--- Comment #7 from Oleh Derevenko 2013-01-09
17:26:37 UTC ---
OK. If you are unable to track where you get size of function parameter block
from, close it. I have much other work to do, rather than trying to reproduce
your bugs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09
17:19:33 UTC ---
> verify_ssa crashes during expand for a simple testcase that uses a pair of
> asms to avoid the tree pass pessimization of complex type data moves.
Can you file a bug about t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-09 17:12:45
UTC ---
we put the remapped block in line_table:
#0 0x0101d8cf in get_combined_adhoc_loc (set=0x77ffc000,
locus=968541695, data=0x7fffe8d6fe60)
at /export/gnu/import
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-09 17:12:16
UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Jan 9 17:02:11 2013
New Revision: 195057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195057
Log:
2013-01-09 Vladimir Makarov
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2013-01-09 17:10:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 29127
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29127
preprocessed test case
ive 4.8.0 20130109 (experimental) (revision 195054)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /ssd/fsf/inst/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.0/cc1
-fpreprocessed tc3.i -quiet -dumpbase tc3.c -mtune=generic -march=pentiumpro
-auxbase tc3 -version -o tc3.s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.0 20130109 (experimental) (i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-09
16:35:13 UTC ---
Yes, but I'd say under a different PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-09 16:33:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> BTW, there is a slight inconsistency between the two patterns, the first
> pattern uses sselog1 type for both the unpckldp %0, %0 and %vmovddup %1, %0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Pavlov 2013-01-09
16:31:18 UTC ---
Do I need add include paths to CXXFLAGS?
But I successfully build gcc-4.6.3 and 4.7.2 without add zlib include path to
CXXFLAGS only to CFLAGS.
gcc version 4.8.0 20130109 (experimental) [trunk revision 195054] (GCC)
Using arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
$ ./xgcc -B. -O2 -g ~/ice.i -c
/home/ryan/ice.i: In function 'state_panic':
/home/ryan/ice.i:32:6: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function 'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09 16:29:21
UTC ---
Shall we track the C testcase regression in 4.7 and earlier?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-09
16:20:42 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jan 9 16:20:33 2013
New Revision: 195055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195055
Log:
2013-01-09 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |bootstrap
Version|lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5372
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-09 16:11:06
UTC ---
The BLOCK tree node is cleared by
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00336b4882ee in __memset_sse2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00545fdf in clear_marks ()
at /export/gnu/import/git
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09
16:09:25 UTC ---
> As __float128 is outside of the scope of C/C++, this is not a bug on the C
> library side.
It might be outside the scope of C/C++ but doesn't C99 allow some
implementation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #32 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-09
16:07:19 UTC ---
Well, if you don't pass anything an autoconf test tries to figure out:
--enable-initfini-array
Force the use of sections .init_array and .fini_array (instead of .init and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #31 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 16:00:56 UTC
---
Hurm,...
bash-4.2# cd /tmp
bash-4.2# mkdir expand
bash-4.2# cd expand/
bash-4.2# rpm2cpio /builddir/build/RPMS/libstdc++-4.7.2-8.fc18.sparc64.rpm |
c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou 2013-01-09
15:45:35 UTC ---
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xf8010030a558 in __frame_dummy_init_array_entry ()
>from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
Is /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #29 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 15:29:26 UTC
---
Rebuilt fedoras 4.7.2-8 gcc without --enable-initfini-array reinstalled in a
chroot and rebuilt the test program
bash-4.2# g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09 15:23:54 UTC
---
> Let me look into those...
Try the patch I attached to PR45375
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #166 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09
15:19:41 UTC ---
Markus, the apperance of undefined references I fixed by patch above is highly
sensitive to partitioning and inlining decision. Can you, please, check if the
problem with PGO r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #165 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09
15:16:26 UTC ---
OK, I tracked down the undefined reference to
error: /tmp/cc0oq4BG.ltrans1.ltrans.o: requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc
against '_ZN12SkAnnotationC1ER23SkFlattenableReadBuffer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-09
15:10:55 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 9 15:10:43 2013
New Revision: 195054
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195054
Log:
PR tree-optimiation/55875
* gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-09
14:51:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 9 14:51:09 2013
New Revision: 195051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195051
Log:
PR c/48418
* c-common.c (c_ful
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #28 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-09
14:50:16 UTC ---
Thanks Eric for following this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-09
14:47:12 UTC ---
Thanks Jon.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
