http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55918

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Ringström <tobias at ringis dot se> 2013-01-09 
17:39:20 UTC ---
Yes, I want 'bad_guy' to be in the backtrace, so you are correct that I don't
want the stack to be unwound at all, but unfortunately it is.  It seems to be
because of the Foo object somehow.  If I remove the Foo object (or it's
destructor), 'bad_guy' is in the backtrace.

Reply via email to