http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-09
19:23:31 UTC ---
> And go on telling your tales about numerous optimizations that affect argument
> count on stack and cleanup size of final 'ret'...
Most people get it though, not clear why you don't. Anyway, you seems to have
a simple workaround (compiling with -O2 instead of -O3) so you aren't blocked.
