[Bug target/55711] Internal compiler error while compiling openssl1.0.1c/crypto/asn1/a_strex.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55711 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assig

[Bug fortran/55638] Wrongly accepts INTENT + VALUE - and wrongly requires it for PURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-15 23:25:41 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 15 23:25:36 2012 New Revision: 194525 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194525 Log: 2012-12-16 Tobias Burnus

[Bug c/55695] Miscompilation of pow() & sqrt() using musl libc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55695 ojab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot |

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 21:26:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > > Question is: Is the packing needed here? I would guess that it isn't. > > Of course I might be wrong here. After all, array_t3_ptr is a

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 21:06:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > > type(t3), pointer :: array_t3_ptr(:,:) > > call sub_array_assumed (array_t3_ptr) > > contains > > subroutine sub_array_as

[Bug c/55711] New: Internal compiler error while compiling openssl1.0.1c/crypto/asn1/a_strex.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55711 Bug #: 55711 Summary: Internal compiler error while compiling openssl1.0.1c/crypto/asn1/a_strex.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 S

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 20:47:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original > "sub_array_assumed \\(D" 2 > FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.

[Bug ada/53766] [4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in build_binary_op on Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements with -gnatp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766 --- Comment #5 from Duncan Sands 2012-12-15 20:04:16 UTC --- Thanks for fixing the problem!

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler 2012-12-15 19:55:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) So will the following do that: // template struct X { static void (*code) (); }; template void (*X::code) () = []{}; // Line 7 int ma

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 19:46:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Ok, revised version of the patch from comment 9, which fixes the runtime > > failure on internal_pack_10.f90

[Bug ada/54799] Missing ";" gives "GNAT BUG DETECTED" box

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54799 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-15 19:07:34 UTC --- To repeat: in order to, so to speak, raise the priority of this issue, we need a testcase which was accepted by 4.6.x (or 4.7.x): the testcase we have got isn't Ok for that, bec

[Bug libmudflap/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer::__min'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-15 19:03:10 UTC --- Oops, 4.6.x says that NSDMIs are needed for line 10 and rejects it, that misled me. Then, what can I say, probably the issue isn't a regression and it's only superficially simil

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-12-15 18:57:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Note that my first example is not related to NSDMIs, it occurs in a static data member initializer. The actual reason for understanding the possible reasons

[Bug ada/52420] ada build failure with -gdwarf-4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52420 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/52735] ICE in gnat_to_gnu_entity at gcc-interface/decl.c:4156

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52735 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/52735] Compiler crash with gnat_to_gnu_entity, at ada/gcc-interface/decl.c:4156

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52735 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-15 18:47:57 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Dec 15 18:47:53 2012 New Revision: 194523 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194523 Log: PR ada/52735 * gnat.dg/nest

[Bug ada/52735] Compiler crash with gnat_to_gnu_entity, at ada/gcc-interface/decl.c:4156

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52735 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer::__min'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-15 18:29:33 UTC --- Related to PR 55015.

[Bug ada/53766] [4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in build_binary_op on Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements with -gnatp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/53766] [4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in build_binary_op on Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements with -gnatp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-15 18:16:33 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Dec 15 18:16:28 2012 New Revision: 194522 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194522 Log: PR ada/53766 Backport from

[Bug target/51784] PIC register not correctly preserved in nested funcs / with non-local goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot

[Bug target/52444] non-local gotos are broken on x86 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug ada/53766] [4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in build_binary_op on Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements with -gnatp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3 Summary|ICE in

[Bug ada/53766] ICE in build_binary_op on Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements with -gnatp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-15 18:11:43 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Dec 15 18:11:38 2012 New Revision: 194521 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194521 Log: PR ada/53766 * gnat.dg/cont

[Bug ada/53996] format string issue in gcc-interface/utils.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53996 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/53996] format string issue in gcc-interface/utils.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53996 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-15 17:50:55 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Dec 15 17:50:49 2012 New Revision: 194520 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194520 Log: PR ada/53996 * gcc-interfac

[Bug c++/55710] New: [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 Bug #: 55710 Summary: [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-12-15 16:47:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Strangely enough I needed to add some epsilon to 0.5 so that > > the second test passes, because the exact value 0.5 appears

[Bug c++/55680] [C++11] Member specialization with lambda is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2012-12-15 16:44:08 UTC --- The same problem exists for gcc 4.8.0 20121209 (experimental). The code looks valid to me. I tried to deduce the root of the compiler problem here. For example trying to rewrite it a

[Bug middle-end/55709] [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert compiling cp/pt.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55709 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-15 16:40:10 UTC --- So just test the same patch as in PR52894 for trunk and submit it?

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/55709] New: [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert compiling cp/pt.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55709 Bug #: 55709 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert compiling cp/pt.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug fortran/53876] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with class array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin 2012-12-15 16:16:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Here is a reduced version of internal_pack_10.f90, which is the only > runtime-failure in the testsuite for the patch in comment #9: > [...] >

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 16:05:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Note: This still shows scan-tree-dump failures on assumed_type_2.f90, but now > only 2 of them at -O0 (instead of 4): > > FAIL: gfortran

[Bug bootstrap/55707] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/55705] [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/55703] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in lto_fixup_prevailing_decls, at lto/lto.c:2732 in gcc.c-torture/execute/920721-4.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52444] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE fails at -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-15 14:23:17 UTC --- I see the same behavior on x86_64 Fedora linux... /home/howarth/work-gcc/gcc/xgcc -B/home/howarth/work-gcc/gcc/ /home/howarth/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c -fn

[Bug c/52444] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE fails at -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-15 14:17:18 UTC --- One interesting thing is that slightly different assembly is generated each time you recompile this test case... # diff -u pr44777.s pr44777.s.PROFILE_GENERATE --- pr44777.s

[Bug c/52444] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE fails at -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-15 14:15:20 UTC --- Created attachment 28977 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28977 assembly file for gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE on x86_64-

[Bug c/52444] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE fails at -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-15 14:02:23 UTC --- This issue doesn't occur under darwin10 but when object files, created under darwin10, are linked under darwin12 this runtime failure occurs. I opened radar://12875171 in case th

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 13:46:26 UTC --- Ok, revised version of the patch from comment 9, which fixes the runtime failure on internal_pack_10.f90: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c ===

[Bug bootstrap/55706] [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 13:06:37 UTC --- Here is a reduced version of internal_pack_10.f90, which is the only runtime-failure in the testsuite for the patch in comment #9: module mo_obs_rules type t_set

[Bug c++/55708] New: g++ crashes: constexpr function with reference parameters.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55708 Bug #: 55708 Summary: g++ crashes: constexpr function with reference parameters. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/55706] [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-15 12:47:13 UTC --- Ah of course, this is the fix for PR 52015 You need to use at least r5437 from the Mingw-w64 trunk for 4.8, I will update the release notes today

[Bug bootstrap/55706] [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-15 12:43:15 UTC --- This implies the type of std::vswprintf is wrong on that platform.

[Bug ada/53996] format string issue in gcc-interface/utils.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53996 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/55088] ada tarball missing COPYING file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55088 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/55704] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures building ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---

[Bug ada/54549] Assertion failure in sinfo.adb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54549 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug ada/51898] Assertion failure in sinfo.adb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51898 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/51555] Thinks System.Address is 64 bits wide when compiling with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51555 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 11:00:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > The following patch (which amounts to a partial revert of r156749) fixes the > behavior of comment #2 for me: Ugh. Apparently it was muc

[Bug bootstrap/55707] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 Bug #: 55707 Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 10:56:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > The following patch (which amounts to a partial revert of r156749) fixes the > behavior of comment #2 for me: Note: The patch in comment #

[Bug bootstrap/55706] New: [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706 Bug #: 55706 Summary: [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug libmudflap/53952] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/55697] Another ice in remove_redundant_iv_tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55697 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/55684] [4.8 Regression] ICE in remove_redundant_iv_tests, at tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c:559

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55684 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- C

[Bug libmudflap/53952] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-15 10:25:24 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Dec 15 10:25:15 2012 New Revision: 194519 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194519 Log: PR libmudflap/53952 * expr.c (mem_re

[Bug libfortran/55705] New: [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705 Bug #: 55705 Summary: [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7

[Bug ada/55704] [4.7 Regression] Failures building ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich 2012-12-15 10:14:47 UTC --- The same for 4.8.0 in stage 1: g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-for

[Bug ada/55704] New: [4.7 Regression] Failures building ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704 Bug #: 55704 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Failures building ada Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal