http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 21:06:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > > type(t3), pointer :: array_t3_ptr(:,:) > > call sub_array_assumed (array_t3_ptr) > > contains > > subroutine sub_array_assumed (arg3) > type(*), target :: arg3(*) > end subroutine > > end > > [...] > > Question is: Is the packing needed here? I would guess that it isn't. Of course I might be wrong here. After all, array_t3_ptr is a pointer, so it's not guaranteed to be contiguous, right? If the packing is indeed required in this place, we just need to fix the test case (assumed_type_2.f90) ...
