http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 10:56:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > The following patch (which amounts to a partial revert of r156749) fixes the > behavior of comment #2 for me: Note: The patch in comment #7 actually fixes both test cases (comment #0 and #2), and is in that sense superior over the patch in comment #1. However, it yields the following testsuite failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\(D" 2 FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original "\\.data = \\(void .\\) &array_t1.0.;" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\(\\(struct t1.0:. .\\) parm" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\(\\(struct t3.0:. .\\) array_t3_ptr.data\\);" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90 -O0 execution test
