http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-10 04:13:32
UTC ---
A potential fix:
diff --git a/gcc/emit-rtl.c b/gcc/emit-rtl.c
index 95bbfa7..d7c454c 100644
--- a/gcc/emit-rtl.c
+++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.c
@@ -2109,6 +2109,12 @@ adjust_address_1 (rtx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259
Bug #: 55259
Summary: plus_constant doesn't handle zero-extended address
properly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-10 02:30:16
UTC ---
Something like this:
diff --git a/gcc/explow.c b/gcc/explow.c
index 6109832..9ec38f9 100644
--- a/gcc/explow.c
+++ b/gcc/explow.c
@@ -84,12 +84,22 @@ plus_constant (enum machine_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55258
Bug #: 55258
Summary: SSE register isn't used for 16byte copy
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-10 01:58:31
UTC ---
We fail to see (mem:TI (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI 82))) is offsettable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
Bug #: 55257
Summary: [4.8 Regression]:
g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C scan-assembler
thunk.C:30
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-10 01:39:16
UTC ---
We don't properly handle memory operand in
(insn 19 17 20 2 (set (reg:TI 85 [ *_15 ])
(mem:TI (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI 82)) [0 *_15+0 S16 A32])) x.i:29 61
{*movti_internal_r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-10 01:32:06
UTC ---
There are 2 issues here:
1. Should we use
movdqu(%eax), %xmm0# 19*movti_internal_rex64/4[length = 5]
movdqa%xmm0, (%rsp)# 29*movti_internal_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
--- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-10 01:28:52 UTC ---
If possible, I think SJLJ support should go. I can't remember the
exact status of SJLJ for HP-UX 10
but a comment in hpux-unwind.h suggests that I tested dwarf2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54942
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34226
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51937
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55256
Bug #: 55256
Summary: Out of memory preprocessing nested tgmath.h functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43302
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40180
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38642
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
--- Comment #22 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-09
23:13:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Shorter testcase, compilable and to the point. We are not able to CSE
> the b1 && ... && b8 sequence because we produce control-flow for it
> du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55229
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855
--- Comment #42 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-09
23:06:18 UTC ---
It'd be interesting to get some new timings, with the new register-pressure
aware scheduling and with LRA. Oh, and maybe with the patch to restrain the
reassoc pass a bit (ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24698
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24334
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23835
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #27 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-09
22:41:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Another way that fixes the problem mentioned above is to not allow non-float
mode operands in the first place. The patch below also fixes the failure,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Status|ASSIG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21714
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P3
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rupp at gnat dot com
Know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28968
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |---
Summary|[4.8 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55255
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 22:05:20 UTC ---
Slightly reduced test case:
MODULE MY_ARRAY
TYPE ARRAY
REAL, ALLOCATABLE :: VALS
END TYPE
CONTAINS
TYPE(ARRAY) FUNCTION MAKE_ARRAY()
END FUNCTION
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55229
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #26 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-09
21:44:16 UTC ---
I've tried enabling sched1 on rev 193341 and ran the test suite with
make -k -j4 check
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-09
21:42:25 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 9 21:42:21 2012
New Revision: 193376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193376
Log:
PR other/52438
* s-taspri-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-09
21:42:06 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 9 21:42:02 2012
New Revision: 193375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193375
Log:
PR other/52438
* s-taspri-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41004
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55255
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55230
--- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-11-09
20:31:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Caused by:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193204
>
> /* { dg-do run { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-require-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-11-09 20:23:47 UTC ---
It's a "feature", not a bug (see PR41748, PR45696, and PR48383). Perhaps it
should be mentioned in the preprocessor documentation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55255
Bug #: 55255
Summary: Compiler segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54916
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55254
Bug #: 55254
Summary: Warn for implicit conversion from int to char
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|jaso
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
Bug #: 55253
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Revision 193298 miscompiles sqlite
with -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252
Bug #: 55252
Summary: Caret diagnostic doesn't show useful location when
macro clashes with name in system header
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-09
16:38:16 UTC ---
OK, I applied it to our autotester and we will see tomorrow if it fixes the
segfaults.
If so, can I go ahead and commit it?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55251
Bug #: 55251
Summary: inconsistent OpenMP tasks scheduling
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-11-09
16:14:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 9 16:14:48 2012
New Revision: 193368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193368
Log:
PR c++/54859
* pt.c (check_inst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55154
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-11-09
15:33:27 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 9 15:33:19 2012
New Revision: 193364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193364
Log:
2012-11-09 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #8 from Gary Funck 2012-11-09 15:26:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Completely untested patch for someone else to foster-parent:
> + }
> + }
> f = find_fallthru_edge (last_bb->succs);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139
--- Comment #5 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 15:24:32 UTC ---
Author: ak
Date: Fri Nov 9 15:24:25 2012
New Revision: 193363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193363
Log:
Handle target specific memory models
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54546
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-11-09
14:28:49 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 9 14:28:40 2012
New Revision: 193361
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193361
Log:
2012-11-09 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen 2012-11-09
14:06:20 UTC ---
My earlier analysis was not correct. I was chasing the wrong warning.
Rather the problem is in c-common.c, where the atomic models are checked again.
I'm sending a patch for that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Multiple copy constructors |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #27 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-09 13:29:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > Maybe the better solution would indeed be to add a
> > arith -> logical shift conversion pass before combine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55250
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-11-09
12:33:33 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, backports to 4.7/4.6 are needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-09
12:31:40 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Fri Nov 9 12:31:32 2012
New Revision: 193359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193359
Log:
PR middle-end/54385
* postre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-11-09
12:28:30 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Nov 9 12:28:21 2012
New Revision: 193358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193358
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
--- Comment #4 from Antony Polukhin 2012-11-09
12:28:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Yes, thanks.
`output.txt` will be the same.
Also, reproduced this bug on GCC 4.7.2:
[cc@ontos-soa-01 ~]$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55250
Bug #: 55250
Summary: [C++0x][constexpr] enum declarations within constexpr
function are allowed, constexpr declarations are not
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-11-09 11:33:37 UTC ---
I've repeated the tests again on a different machine and the result are the
same
gcc version 4.8.0 20121108 (experimental) [trunk revision 19] (GCC)
at O3 lto degrades the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #26 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-09
10:48:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Maybe the better solution would indeed be to add a
> arith -> logical shift conversion pass before combine, or try to convert arith
> shifts in the spl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55221
--- Comment #3 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-11-09
10:47:22 UTC ---
forgot to add, all these builds are with
a patch to unwind-ia64.h. For example, for 4.8
branch, the patch is (credit to ger...@freebsd.org):
Index: libgcc/config/ia64/un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55221
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-11-09
10:40:41 UTC ---
On the same system I can build gcc-4.8.0.20121014
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
--- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin 2012-11-09
10:24:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28648
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28648
Preprocessed file that triggers the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Bug #: 55249
Summary: Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to
link errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55246
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #32 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-11-09 10:05:18 UTC ---
> If you can use the additional free time to walk over to my
> brother's office, then please say 'Hi' to him. Otherwise the faculty meeting
> will have to do :-)
Let's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #31 from Tobias Schlüter 2012-11-09
09:43:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > I committed the C-only version of the patch as the issues mentioned in
> > comment
> > #27 couldn't be addressed before s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
90 matches
Mail list logo
