Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com
Host: Linux x86_64
Target: AVR
Build: 4.8.0 20120903
gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54475
Bug #: 54475
Summary: -O2 overoptimizes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54362
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-04
01:31:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 28128
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28128
Patch which I committed to Cavium's toolchain
This patch is what I am testing. It applies without a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #20 from Ulrich Drepper 2012-09-04
01:06:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28127
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28127
Check for rdrand availability
How about this patch? Not sure whether this handles cross-compiling
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54362
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
Bug #: 54474
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_3.f90
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54465
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40836
Daniel Drake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsd at laptop dot org
--- Comment #30 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54473
Bug #: 54473
Summary: Compiling advancemame on raspberry pi yields
unrecognizable insn
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53395
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53395
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-03
20:31:55 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Sep 3 20:31:52 2012
New Revision: 190904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190904
Log:
2012-09-03 Andrew Pinski
PR tree-opt/533
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54335
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54335
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-03
19:08:54 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Sep 3 19:08:51 2012
New Revision: 190903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190903
Log:
Add -da and remove -dm in GCC manual
Ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54335
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-03
19:07:38 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Sep 3 19:07:34 2012
New Revision: 190902
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190902
Log:
Add -da and remove -dm in GCC manual
Ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
Bug #: 54472
Summary: ICE (spill_failure): unable to find a register to
spill in class 'AREG' with -O -fschedule-insns
-fselective-scheduling
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471
Bug #: 54471
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-8.c execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #13 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-09-03 17:44:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> If I remember correctly, the original testcase ICEs the same way with -O.
> eg.
> $ gcc -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling --param
> max-sched-extend-r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54470
Bug #: 54470
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-4.c scan-ipa-dump inline
"hooray4[^\\n]*inline copy in test4"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Bug #: 54469
Summary: FAIL: gnat.dg/array11.adb (test for warnings, line
12)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54436
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54436
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
16:05:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 3 16:05:44 2012
New Revision: 190900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190900
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-09-01 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
16:04:25 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 3 16:04:19 2012
New Revision: 190899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190899
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-08-31 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
16:02:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 3 16:02:52 2012
New Revision: 190898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190898
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-08-24 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54408
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-09-03 15:47:38 UTC ---
Built-in mathematical functions are generally type-generic where they
correspond to type-generic math.h macros (e.g. isgreater, isnan), not
otherwise. (__builtin_sig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #8 from Douglas Mencken 2012-09-03
15:45:09 UTC ---
Why the ``Revert a few Makefile.am regexps'' is still not committed? This sed
gotcha is not about single architecture, not about bit-wideness (32- or
64-bit), it's very common. And t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #34 from Michael Matz 2012-09-03 15:39:20
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Mon Sep 3 15:39:15 2012
New Revision: 190897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190897
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46590
* tree-cfg.c (gim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54138
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54138
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54138
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-03
14:40:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 3 14:40:17 2012
New Revision: 190895
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190895
Log:
2012-09-03 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-03
14:27:27 UTC ---
I'm testing
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (revision 190889)
+++ gcc/tree-ss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54467
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-03
14:06:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 3 14:06:27 2012
New Revision: 190892
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190892
Log:
2012-09-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54467
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-03
13:48:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> >
> > That looks quite wasteful ... that vector will be extremely sparse.
>
> Do you mean that it will be wasteful after t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2012-09-03 13:38:36 UTC ---
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:14:22AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
>
> Tobias Burnus changed:
>
>What|Remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54468
Bug #: 54468
Summary: type trait is_unsigned<...>::value for C++11 enum
class with underlying unsigned type not true
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54362
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54362
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-03
13:24:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 3 13:24:07 2012
New Revision: 190889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190889
Log:
2012-09-03 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54467
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bur...@net-b.de
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/app2/gcc/4.8.0-20120903-svn190873/x86_64/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/app2/gcc/4.8.0-20120903-svn190873/x86_64
--enable-languages=c,c++,f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
11:42:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 3 11:42:31 2012
New Revision: 190883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190883
Log:
PR debug/53923
* valtrack.c (dead_debug_ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-09-03
11:29:09 UTC ---
Bootstrap on sparc64-linux succeeded with Steven's patch applied.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
Bug #: 54466
Summary: Recursive Type Alias, Member Function Pointer,
Segmentation Fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor 2012-09-03
10:51:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
>
> That looks quite wasteful ... that vector will be extremely sparse.
Do you mean that it will be wasteful after the patch or in general?
In any case, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54449
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54441
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Version|unkno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54422
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54421
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54417
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-03
10:26:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > This commit or the previous one caused a lot of ICEs (see
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-08/msg02988.html)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-03 10:21:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The basic-block vectorizer does not handle reductions and it would be another
> natural place to perform this optimization.
I thought about turning a PLUS_EXP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #12 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-09-03 10:17:15
UTC ---
If I remember correctly, the original testcase ICEs the same way with -O.
eg.
$ gcc -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling --param
max-sched-extend-regions-iters=8 gcc.c-torture/compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54408
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54374
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-03 10:01:46
UTC ---
Omitting the sign/zero extensions is not safe for calculated QImode / HImode
values, only after the extending loads. However, I guess it would still be a
little bit better to do something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54373
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54362
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54360
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
09:48:17 UTC ---
If it is exported from the library, then it surely can't depend on configure
checks and must have a fallback in that case (/dev/random reading?).
Inlines that aren't exported from the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-03
09:43:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> So, I think this is something that should be tested for in libstdc++-v3
> configure and enabled in the headers only if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_* macro is defined.
One
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
09:06:29 UTC ---
Cleaned up testcase (and no longer invalid):
unsigned int a, b, c;
void
foo (unsigned int x)
{
do
{
if (a == 0 ? 1 : 1 % a)
for (; b; b--)
lab:;
el
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Richard G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-09-03
08:21:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created attachment 28121 [details]
> gcc48-pr54455.patch
>
> Patch for 2). asm goto with fallthru labels is pretty hard case, handled in
> cfgrtl.c h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54415
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-03
08:03:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28121
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28121
gcc48-pr54455.patch
Patch for 2). asm goto with fallthru labels is pretty hard case, handled in
cfg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #6
86 matches
Mail list logo
