http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409

--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-03 
10:51:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> 
> That looks quite wasteful ... that vector will be extremely sparse.

Do you mean that it will be wasteful after the patch or in general?

In any case, we deallocate it at the end of the same function
(estimate_function_body_sizes) so it might not really matter compared
to more persistent allocations?

Reply via email to