http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409

--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-03 
13:48:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > 
> > That looks quite wasteful ... that vector will be extremely sparse.
> 
> Do you mean that it will be wasteful after the patch or in general?

In general.

> In any case, we deallocate it at the end of the same function
> (estimate_function_body_sizes) so it might not really matter compared
> to more persistent allocations?

Ah, indeed.

Reply via email to