http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-03 13:48:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > > That looks quite wasteful ... that vector will be extremely sparse. > > Do you mean that it will be wasteful after the patch or in general? In general. > In any case, we deallocate it at the end of the same function > (estimate_function_body_sizes) so it might not really matter compared > to more persistent allocations? Ah, indeed.