[Bug target/53447] missed optimization of 64bit ALU operation with small constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53447 --- Comment #2 from Carrot 2012-05-23 06:54:55 UTC --- A question about related pattern 626 (define_insn_and_split "*arm_adddi3" 627 [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand" "=&r,&r") 628 (plus:DI (match_operand:DI

[Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-23 01:31:29 UTC --- I tried it with --enable-languages=all ?

[Bug c++/29185] inconsistent warning: deleting array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29185 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-05-23 00:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm. > > The ARM port does have MI thunk support. The question is "why

[Bug other/53231] libatomic/tas_n.c:100:10: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53231 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/53231] libatomic/tas_n.c:100:10: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53231 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2012-05-22 23:54:36 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Tue May 22 23:54:32 2012 New Revision: 187783 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187783 Log: PR other/53231 * tas_n.c (libat_test_

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-22 23:32:34 UTC --- gcc hasn't changed the emitted DWARF in this case for more than 12 years.

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-22 23:10:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > There is no point to emit DW_AT_comp_dir if all filenames in the > file/directory > table referenced by DW_AT_stmt_list are absolute. Seems to be a request

[Bug c++/53439] g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug gcov-profile/53406] Unit Record not present in header files or in GCOV output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53406 --- Comment #6 from Myron Walker 2012-05-22 21:57:02 UTC --- Not according to the docs in the comments. note: unit function-graph* unit: header int32:checksum string:source function-graph: announce_function basic_blocks {arcs | l

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbmj at verizon dot net --- Comm

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rbmj at verizon dot net | --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-

[Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Bug #: 53457 Summary: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #5 from Niall Douglas 2012-05-22 19:51:04 UTC --- Link to the c++-sig discussion thread: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/2012-May/016581.html For the purposes of assigning tags, this bug is C++11 mode only, GCC 4.7.x o

[Bug regression/53442] llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 René Küttner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rene.kuettner at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #1 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-22 19:04:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27479 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27479 Patch against trunk

[Bug fortran/53456] New: Add time support for VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 Bug #: 53456 Summary: Add time support for VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380 --- Comment #5 from msharov at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-22 18:53:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Adding default handling if there is no FDE is an ABI change, so can't be done > on existing architectures (except those that have that

[Bug c++/52072] Several non-deduced contexts not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072 Bryce Lelbach (wash) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||blelbach at cct dot lsu.edu --- Co

[Bug c++/53446] Template function incorrectly rejected when convertible argument is provided for a parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446 Bryce Lelbach (wash) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 Niall Douglas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s_gccbugzilla at nedprod

[Bug regression/53442] llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 --- Comment #5 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-05-22 18:22:09 UTC --- By comparing the linker commands, I've found that replacing crtbegin.o and crtend.o is sufficient to fix the problem. I've built parts of gcc with -flto and I suspect the

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-22 18:04:21 UTC --- Richard, the patch looks good. It fixed the reduced test case, solves the customer problem, and bootstraps on powerpc64-linux with no regressions.

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #13 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-05-22 17:49:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > So yes, what remains for this bug is to complain about undefined behavior due > to accessing the value of an object after its lifetime has ended. The d

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #13 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-05-22 17:49:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > So yes, what remains for this bug is to complain about undefined behavior due > to accessing the value of an object after its lifetime has ended. The d

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #2 from Jonas Wielicki 2012-05-22 17:42:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27478 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27478 -save-temps output for crashtest.cpp (my small test program) again sorry for the .gz, same as above

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-22 17:41:45 UTC --- I checked the behavior of clang and icc with the following testcase: extern "C" int printf (const char *,...); struct A { int i; ~A() { printf ("~A()\n"); } }; int main() { f

[Bug c++/53455] g++ builds segfault in boost::python

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #1 from Jonas Wielicki 2012-05-22 17:41:18 UTC --- Created attachment 27477 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27477 -save-temps output for inheritance.cpp from boost::python 1.48 Sorry for the .gz, but bugzilla refu

[Bug c++/53455] New: g++ builds segfault in boost::python

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 Bug #: 53455 Summary: g++ builds segfault in boost::python Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/53008] abort in _ITM_getTMCloneSafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Component|ada

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-05-22 16:36:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm. The ARM port does have MI thunk support. The question is "why isn't it being used"? R.

[Bug middle-end/53432] [4.8 Regression] ICE failed to reclaim unneeded function in same comdat group

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53432 Roman Kononov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roman at binarylife dot net --- Comment #

[Bug ada/53008] abort in _ITM_getTMCloneSafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Marlier 2012-05-22 15:58:53 UTC --- Aldy, Actually the problem is different that my first thought and it is a real bug. The problem is well described into the 'testcase for gcc testsuite'. In the testcase, you have a

[Bug ada/53008] abort in _ITM_getTMCloneSafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53454] New: [RX backend]: redundant insn being expanded for long long trivial arithmetic comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53454 Bug #: 53454 Summary: [RX backend]: redundant insn being expanded for long long trivial arithmetic comparison Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug c++/53446] Template function incorrectly rejected when convertible argument is provided for a parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug target/48941] [arm gcc] NEON: Stack pointer operations performed even tho stack is not accessed at all in function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941 --- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-22 14:16:34 UTC --- > There are still a few vmov's between Vector registers but I suspect that is > because of the vcombine at the end for which RichardE might have something in > flight. This i

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-22 13:58:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > It looks like the lines... > > if (!IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (filename) && filename[0] != '<') > add_comp_dir_attribute (die); > > in gen_compile_unit

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 13:52:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, > I see the following: > 6882 FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var) > 6883{ > 6884 if (var->alias) > 6885continue; > 6886 > 6887

[Bug debug/49167] dwarf marker for function return instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49167 --- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2012-05-22 14:30:35 UTC --- test comment

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-22 13:33:01 UTC --- It looks like the lines... if (!IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (filename) && filename[0] != '<') add_comp_dir_attribute (die); in gen_compile_unit_die() of dwarf2out.c need adjusted f

[Bug middle-end/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during lto-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 --- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-05-22 13:42:17 UTC --- mine is a one-year-old libc GNU C Library stable release version 2.13, by Roland McGrath et al. …. Compiled by GNU CC version 4.6.1 20110520 (prerelease). Compiled on a Linux 2.6

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-22 13:31:28 UTC --- OK, I see the following: 6882 FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var) 6883{ 6884 if (var->alias) 6885continue; 6886 6887 get_vi_for_tree (var->symbol.decl); 68

[Bug c/53452] large array problem x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53452 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/53453] New: darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 Bug #: 53453 Summary: darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/53161] [4.8 Regression] ICE with weakref function and a function which takes vector types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-22 13:20:19 UTC --- OK, this problem is caused by C++ FE corrupting symbol table by creating new symbol from DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME langhook while creating another symbol. There has to be better ways to produ

[Bug c++/53451] [4.8 regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53451 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #2 from vincenzo

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-22 13:13:04 UTC --- Yep, I'll check it out. Thanks, Richard!

[Bug middle-end/53450] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compiling libiberty/cp-demangle.c with -O2 in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53450 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during lto-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern

[Bug c/53452] large array problem x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53452 --- Comment #1 from Peter Faasse 2012-05-22 13:03:59 UTC --- Created attachment 27476 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27476 gcc -v etcetera version of gcc Distribution is Slackware-64 13.37

[Bug c/53452] New: large array problem x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53452 Bug #: 53452 Summary: large array problem x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug libstdc++/53429] libstdc++ should guarantee not to expose complex::{imag,real} so it supports both C++98 and C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429 Jeffrey Yasskin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-22 12:53:43 UTC --- > But I have a variable that fulfills varpool_all_refs_explicit_p but still > its DECL_INITIAL contains &X where I have no varpool node for X for. So > if I constant fold from it I can

[Bug middle-end/53450] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compiling libiberty/cp-demangle.c with -O2 in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53450 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug middle-end/53450] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compiling libiberty/cp-demangle.c with -O2 in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53450 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53451] [4.8 regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53451 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 12:47:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > by changing it to > > > > if (!vnode > > || DECL_INITIAL (vnode) == error_mark_node > > || !varpool_all_refs_expl

[Bug middle-end/53408] [4.6 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction, at tree-vect-loop.c:3222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.1 Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-22 12:19:55 UTC --- > by changing it to > > if (!vnode > || DECL_INITIAL (vnode) == error_mark_node > || !varpool_all_refs_explicit_p (vnode)) > make_copy_

[Bug regression/52383] [4.6 Regression] miscompiles Perl on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52383 --- Comment #6 from Thorsten Glaser 2012-05-22 12:17:36 UTC --- Hm, I was pretty sure I tracked it down to aranym. But anyway, it’s gone.

[Bug c++/53451] New: [4.8 regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

s/cern.ch/cms/slc5_amd64_gcc470/external/gcc/4.7.0 --with-mpfr=/afs/cern.ch/cms/slc5_amd64_gcc470/external/gcc/4.7.0 --prefix=/afs/cern.ch/user/i/innocent/w3/gcc47slc5 --with-build-time-tools=/build/ge/new-binutils/a/slc5_amd64_gcc470/external/gcc/4.7.0-cms/bin Thread model: posix gcc version 4

[Bug target/53192] Incorrect arguments to AVX2's gather intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-22 11:52:12 UTC --- BTW, to avoid that warning, you could use in C: extern __inline __m128i __attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__)) _mm_i32gather_epi64 ( #ifdef __cplusplus

[Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380 --- Comment #3 from msharov at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-05-22 11:21:41 UTC --- > Did -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables do what you wanted it to do? In that > disable the unwinding tables when not using exceptions? No, it did not. For example

[Bug plugins/41757] Add PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41757 pageexec at freemail dot hu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pageexec at freemail dot hu

[Bug middle-end/53450] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in compiling libiberty/cp-demangle.c with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53450 Bug #: 53450 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in compiling libiberty/cp-demangle.c with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53192] Incorrect arguments to AVX2's gather intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-22 11:04:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > What does clang report for this: > > #include > void f() { >printf( > "%." > "*d"); > } > > ? An even more interesting example is this: #defin

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-22 10:55:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > The format string could be even something like >void f() { > __builtin_printf( > u8R"abcd(%.)abcd" >"*d"); >

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53408] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction, at tree-vect-loop.c:3222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 10:46:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 10:46:21 2012 New Revision: 187770 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187770 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug bootstrap/49707] GCC sends incorrect flags to native IRIX ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49707 --- Comment #3 from kais58 at sucs dot org 2012-05-22 10:33:03 UTC --- I should have updated this earlier, it turned out to be a problem with the standard ld in IRIX 6.5, using the updated one included with MIPSPro made it work without error.

[Bug bootstrap/53449] [4.8 regression] fortran fails to build with LTO bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|[4.8 regressi

[Bug bootstrap/53449] New: [4.8 regression] fortran fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449 Bug #: 53449 Summary: [4.8 regression] fortran fails to build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-22 09:54:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > What does clang report for this: > > #include > void f() { >printf( > "%." > "*d"); > } > > ? /tmp/webcompile/_2090_0.c:5:2: warning: '.*' spec

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:35:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:35:32 2012 New Revision: 187768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187768 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug tree-optimization/53436] Volatile behaves strange with OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-22 10:01:11 UTC --- What GCC did was wrong. But your testcase is clearly invalid as per OpenMP 3.1, 1.4.1: "Similarly, if at least one thread reads from a memory unit and at least one thread writes witho

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:44:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Hum. IPA-PTA ... yeah ... :/ > > > > Mine I guess (note ipa-pta is experimental). > > > > Honza - we are trying to access the varinfo for > > _ZTIN5bo

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:24:10 UTC --- Backported with a new testcase.

[Bug target/53448] [avr] ignoring __attribute__((aligned(2)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53448 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/53389] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -frealloc-lhs: memory leak when assigning array function result to allocatable array, where one of its supplied arguments is itself an array function resul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53389 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-22 10:10:55 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 22 10:10:47 2012 New Revision: 187769 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187769 Log: 2012-05-22 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/53

[Bug target/53192] Incorrect arguments to AVX2's gather intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192 --- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2012-05-22 08:22:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please provide a testcase to show the problem. I have no idea, which kind of test it should be. These is just MS-ICC-GCC incompatibility issue

[Bug target/52407] [4.6 Regression] sse2 simd uint32_t and int64_t and stack variable initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52407 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:20:24 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:20:15 2012 New Revision: 187763 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187763 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther Backp

[Bug objc++/53441] [4.8 Regression] obj-c++.dg/ivar-invalid-type-1.mm ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53441 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/53336] [4.8 Regression] invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53336 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2012-05-22 08:32:07 UTC --- Author: bonzini Date: Tue May 22 08:31:52 2012 New Revision: 187759 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187759 Log: gcc: 2012-05-16 Paolo Bonzini PR tree-opt

[Bug middle-end/53437] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53437] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:33:51 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:33:42 2012 New Revision: 187767 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187767 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:28:44 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:28:38 2012 New Revision: 187765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187765 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug target/53334] [4.8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2131

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-22 09:07:03 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue May 22 09:06:55 2012 New Revision: 187761 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187761 Log: Fix PR target/53334 2012-05-22 Ramana Ra

[Bug regression/52383] [4.6 Regression] miscompiles Perl on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52383 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:23:14 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:23:01 2012 New Revision: 187764 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187764 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther Backpo

[Bug c/52862] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE convert_to_pointer, at convert.c:50

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52862 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-22 09:17:53 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:17:42 2012 New Revision: 187762 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187762 Log: 2012-05-22 Richard Guenther Backpo

[Bug target/52407] [4.6 Regression] sse2 simd uint32_t and int64_t and stack variable initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52407 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

  1   2   >