http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53432
Roman Kononov <roman at binarylife dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roman at binarylife dot net
--- Comment #2 from Roman Kononov <roman at binarylife dot net> 2012-05-22
16:11:42 UTC ---
Here is a testcase (independent of the original one):
$ cat test.cpp
struct A;
struct B;
struct AA { virtual void afoo(A&); };
struct BB { virtual void bfoo(B&); };
template<typename X>
void bar(A& a,X& x) {
x.afoo(a);
}
void bar(A& ss,int& x);
struct ZZ: BB, AA {
int i;
void afoo(A& a) { bar(a,i); }
void bfoo(B&);
};
void bar(A& a) {
ZZ zz;
bar(a,zz);
}
$ g++ -c -O2 test.cpp
_ZN2ZZ4afooER1A/0 (virtual void ZZ::afoo(A&)) @0x7f1ecda1cc30
Type: function
Visibility: public weak comdat comdat_group:_ZN2ZZ4afooER1A one_only
section_name:.text._ZN2ZZ4afooER1A virtual
Same comdat group as: _ZThn8_N2ZZ4afooER1A/2
Address is taken.
References:
Referring: _ZTV2ZZ/16 (addr)
Availability: not_available
Function flags: body finalized
Called by:
Calls:
test.cpp:23:1: internal compiler error: failed to reclaim unneeded function in
same comdat group
}
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
