http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49185
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-27
05:09:59 UTC ---
*** Bug 49185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49091
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49179
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49185
Summary: gcj does not accept classes with same name fields at
new gcc version
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215
--- Comment #8 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-27 04:37:22 UTC ---
gij is OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-27
04:04:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 27 04:04:40 2011
New Revision: 174319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174319
Log:
PR c++/47721
* parser.c (cp_parser_member_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47956
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-27
04:01:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 27 04:01:46 2011
New Revision: 174317
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174317
Log:
PR c++/47956
* decl.c (check_static_variabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #15 from Kris 2011-05-27
03:33:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> *) The error is triggered by USEing a module in which a 'bad' procedure is
> defined.
> *) A 'bad' procedure is one having
> b) a dummy argument 'foo' which is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49184
Summary: r174284 breaks darwin bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49183
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49183
Summary: gcc removes assert
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
This is some low-level crypto code, an MMX implementation of Dan
Bernstien's "ChaCha" pseudorandom function. The input is a 4x4 array
of 32-bit words, and mixing proceeds down either columns or diagonals.
Thus, the implementation keeps each row in a pair of MMX registers,
does mixing down the col
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
--- Comment #6 from Brad 2011-05-26 23:48:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > I forgot to mention GCC compiles it correctly with the C++ front-end.
> >
> > Removing the typedefs will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-26
23:44:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I forgot to mention GCC compiles it correctly with the C++ front-end.
>
> Removing the typedefs will still cause compilation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-26
23:36:43 UTC ---
This works:
// Forward declaration
typedef struct _a a;
// Pointer to function with struct as parameter
typedef int (*FxnPointer)(a* WontComplie);
// Actual declaration of struct wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
--- Comment #3 from Brad 2011-05-26 23:23:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I forgot to mention GCC compiles it correctly with the C++ front-end.
Removing the typedefs will still cause compilation to error out not knowing
what a is. For exa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-26
23:12:03 UTC ---
I forgot to mention GCC compiles it correctly with the C++ front-end.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49182
Summary: Fordward declarations of struct not usable in function
pointer types.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49135
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49180
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49181
Summary: [C++0x] Error reporting routines re-entered
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #14 from Rich Townsend 2011-05-26
21:43:27 UTC ---
> Fails for me on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7. Apparently
> related to type extension.
I think the bug can be summarized thus:
*) The error is triggered by USEing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 21:25:30 UTC ---
Here is a reduced version of comment #11:
module type_definitions
implicit none
type :: matching
integer :: n = -999
end type
type, extends(matching) :: ellip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-05-26
21:02:03 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu May 26 21:01:57 2011
New Revision: 174309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174309
Log:
2011-05-26 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49180
Summary: pr45070.c fails for -Os -mthumb
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-26 20:49:11
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu May 26 20:49:07 2011
New Revision: 174308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174308
Log:
2011-05-26 Paul Thomas
Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
--- Comment #4 from Jay Veeramony
2011-05-26 20:44:55 UTC ---
When I try to build and compile my code, autoconf is creating the configure
file that does the following:
--
# Compile and link our simple test program by passing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
--- Comment #3 from Jay Veeramony
2011-05-26 20:42:08 UTC ---
When I try to build and compile my code, autoconf is creating the configure
file that does the following:
--
# Compile and link our simple test program by passing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
--- Comment #2 from Roman Kononov 2011-05-26
20:15:35 UTC ---
4.6 branch, r174294
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-26 19:39:50 UTC ---
What exactly is the problem? Is the gfortran driver invoking a subprocess
with separate "-l" and "gfortran" arguments? The code in gcc.c that does
case OPT_l:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-26
19:29:05 UTC ---
I see, agreed. Actual patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02081.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-26
19:25:04 UTC ---
Over my dead body Andrew ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-26
19:22:13 UTC ---
Note the reason why clang warns is because of some body at MS decided that
class and struct would act slightly different. I think we should not follow MS
here and not warn about this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42750
Feng Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchen at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48575
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-26 19:16:10 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu May 26 19:16:05 2011
New Revision: 174305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174305
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/48575
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49177
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Miles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-26
18:52:55 UTC ---
In my experience as implementer, the equivalence between struct and class often
makes for conciseness, like in this case: we know everything will be public
anyway, thus we can spare th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2011-05-26 18:49:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this a C++0x issue? Should be marked as such.
yes, w/o c++0x i get:
heshvpUtils.cpp:460:28: error: declaration of 'hvp::LibraryVersion version()'
not in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26
18:48:13 UTC ---
On the one hand there seem to be no changes in libstdc++ since the revision
where you had a good bootstrap, but I've looked through the libstdc++ Makefiles
and still can't figure out h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49179
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in
evaluate_conditions_for_known_args at
ipa-inline-analysis.c:558 with -O -findirect-inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-26
18:39:56 UTC ---
> Did that work before revision 174284? I'm not sure whether this looks related
> or not.
My last successful update was revision 174269.
I'll try the other choice.
BTW regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-26
18:35:28 UTC ---
Is this a C++0x issue? Should be marked as such.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
18:30:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 26 18:30:13 2011
New Revision: 174303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174303
Log:
PR c++/48211
* name-lookup.h (cp_class_bind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.5.3, 4.6.0|4.5.4, 4.6.1, 4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
18:25:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> + error ("expected an expression");
That sounds like a parse error, when the real issue is a semantic constraint
violation: it would make perfect sens
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26
18:25:30 UTC ---
Did that work before revision 174284? I'm not sure whether this looks related
or not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
--- Comment #2 from fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk 2011-05-26 18:25:03 UTC ---
I realize struct and class are interchangeable.
llvm with -Wextra finds the difference worth warning about.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
Summary: Space between linker option and library in gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-26 18:19:40
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu May 26 18:19:36 2011
New Revision: 174302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174302
Log:
2011-05-26 Paul Thomas
Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49177
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-ifcvt-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #12 from Rich Townsend 2011-05-26
18:05:35 UTC ---
Do we have any progress in fixing this one? It's become a showstopper for me,
alas!
(Serves me right for starting a number of new, large projects in F2003).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-26
18:04:06 UTC ---
With the following patch
--- ../_clean/libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin2010-02-02 11:25:59.0
+0100
+++ libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin2011-05-26 18:42:41.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
Summary: [4.6 Regression][c++0x] valid code rejected with
"error: uninitialized const"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-26
18:01:42 UTC ---
Actually, I can do better.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #50 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-26
17:41:37 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu May 26 17:41:34 2011
New Revision: 174301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174301
Log:
2011-05-26 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
17:02:14 UTC ---
Oops, those patches were really for bug 46005.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-26
16:48:01 UTC ---
Eh, I decided to ask when I saw your fix for 48599 involving type_uses_auto ;)
Anyway, the below indeed appears to work pretty well. Is the error message Ok
with you?
Index: typeck2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175
Summary: vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719
--- Comment #11 from Nitin Kamble 2011-05-26
16:26:45 UTC ---
I am not able to reopen this bug, can somebody reopen the bug?
Thanks,
Nitin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42056
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26
15:33:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In which file should I do the change(s)?
In the one you quoted, libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin.
> How could it work if there is no gcc/libgcc-std.ver file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-26
15:23:24 UTC ---
The same problem may happen for s390 and sh:
[macbook] f90/bug% grep -r libgcc-std.ver /opt/gcc/work/libgcc/*
/opt/gcc/work/libgcc/Makefile.in:libgcc-std.ver: $(srcdir)/libgcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26
15:12:56 UTC ---
Argh, the stupid half-transition again. I grepped only in gcc/config.
I seem to fail getting a cross-build to that point, so could you try changing
$(gcc_srcdir)/libgcc-std.ver
to e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-05-26 15:11:52
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu May 26 15:11:48 2011
New Revision: 174293
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174293
Log:
Fix PR49147: ICE with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215
--- Comment #7 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-26 15:06:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> the Testcase attachments can't donwload
I have got the Testcase,but it still hava problem
[lee@localhost Downloads]$ gcj -v DuplicateField.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
Summary: numeric_limits template is a struct not a class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-26
14:20:54 UTC ---
Richard, thanks for your patch. It fixed most of the failures I saw but there
are still cases where the note doesn't get moved after call split. The
following example ICEs with rev174
ot;GCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20110526 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 pr49168]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173
Summary: [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target
`../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver',
needed by `libgcc.map'.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
13:44:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 26 13:44:20 2011
New Revision: 174287
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174287
Log:
PR c++/48424
* decl.c (grokparms): Function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170
--- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2011-05-26
13:24:31 UTC ---
Rainer, please try:
Index: tree-ssa-math-opts.c
===
--- tree-ssa-math-opts.c(revision 174277)
+++ tree-ssa-mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
13:22:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 26 13:22:51 2011
New Revision: 174285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174285
Log:
PR c++/48424
* decl.c (grokparms): Function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634
--- Comment #15 from Daniel Krügler
2011-05-26 13:01:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Yes, of-course. I opened bug 49171 to ensure that the compiler will diagnose
the cast-situation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #27 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-26
13:01:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 26 13:01:48 2011
New Revision: 174282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174282
Log:
2011-05-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
