[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145

--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-26 
17:02:14 UTC ---
Oops, those patches were really for bug 46005.