[Bug middle-end/40281] [4.4 Regression] -fprefetch-loop-arrays: ICE: in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1887

--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 07:59 --- Subject: Bug 40281 Author: spop Date: Wed Jan 13 07:58:50 2010 New Revision: 155851 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155851 Log: 2010-01-13 Sebastian Pop PR middle-end/40281 *

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 06:33 --- This seems to still be wrong code, so P1. -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/42713] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in tsubst

-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.5.0 Known to work||4.4.2 Target

[Bug other/42713] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in tsubst

--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 05:17 --- It is caused by revision 145440: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg00060.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/42684] [4.5 Regression] ICE when interface operator(xx) available through host and use assoc in module procedure

--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 04:24 --- *** Bug 42680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/42680] [fortran-dev, Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7176

--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 04:24 --- This is a duplicate and the patch in 42684 fixes it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42684 *** -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Add

[Bug fortran/42684] [4.5 Regression] ICE when interface operator(xx) available through host and use assoc in module procedure

--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 04:23 --- Regression testing with the following patch passes. I used p->sym->name instead of q->sym->name in place of NULL, but I do not think it matters. Index: interface.c ===

[Bug c/42721] New: possible integer wrong code bug

/configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/tmp/gcc-r155838-install --program-prefix=r155838- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.5.0 20100112 (experimental) (GCC) reg...@john-home:~/volatile/bugs/tmp254$ cat small.c #include #include stati

[Bug c/42716] [4.5 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_assert, at tree-vrp.c:1423

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 03:18 --- It is caused by revision 152563: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-10/msg00212.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/42684] [4.5 Regression] ICE when interface operator(xx) available through host and use assoc in module procedure

--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 03:13 --- The problem is here. Wrong argument passed to gfc_compare_interfaces. It can't be NULL. I am testing this patch. Index: interface.c === --- inter

[Bug tree-optimization/42720] New: Empty loop generated at unswitch-loops with -O2 -fprofile-use

The bug is triggered with -O2 -fprofile-use. test case, loop.cpp: int fun_b(int hbs[], int num, void *obj) { int i; int s = 0; for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { if (obj != 0) { if ((int)obj - hbs[i] > 0) { s += hbs[i]; } } } return s; } int main () { int i; int s = 0; in

[Bug c/42717] 4.5 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed

-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.5.0 Known to work||4.4.2 Target

[Bug rtl-optimization/42691] problematic REG_EQUAL note added to SUBREG

--- Comment #6 from jingyu at google dot com 2010-01-13 01:18 --- Subject: Re: problematic REG_EQUAL note added to SUBREG > We should try and set changed_i3_dest to 1 in this particular case as well. Here is the patch which only changes changed_i3_dest for two particular case

[Bug c/42717] ice: verify_ssa failed

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 01:17 --- It is caused by revision 149199: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-07/msg00076.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/40920] Derived type with BIND(C) - rejected as argument.

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 00:43 --- A related issue has been reported here http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_frm/thread /ddc211f2987326b8# in particular the error message needs to be rewritten. Error: Type 'resultat' at (1) is a

[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery

--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 00:21 --- The code warning: 155347 jason user_args = args == NULL ? NULL : *args; 155347 jason /* Under DR 147 A::A() is an invalid constructor call, 155347 jason not a functional cast. */ 155347 ja

[Bug other/42715] [4.5 Regression] output_operand: invalid expression as operand

--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 23:34 --- This is caused by revision 151917: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00665.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/40239] Aggregate initialization requires copy constructor

--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 23:33 --- Since we are talking of etiquette, and with the obvious caveats that my mother language is italian + all the caveats about metaphorical uses of language, I would also suggest keeping to a minimum the uses of "p

[Bug c/42708] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993

--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 23:10 --- Fixed for 4.5. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c/42708] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993

--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 23:09 --- Subject: Bug 42708 Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Jan 12 23:09:00 2010 New Revision: 155846 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155846 Log: PR c/42708 * c-typeck.c (build_c_cast): Fold valu

[Bug lto/42532] configuring with --enable-gold introduces many fails in the testsuite

--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 23:04 --- verified with binutils/gcc builds from 20100112 trunks -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42532

[Bug tree-optimization/42719] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O2 -ftracer"

--- Comment #1 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-01-12 22:24 --- Created an attachment (id=19567) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19567&action=view) reduced testcase reduced from gcc/cfgexpand.c Command line: gcc -O2 -ftracer -fcompare-debug -c pr42719.c or gcc -O1

[Bug tree-optimization/42719] New: "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O2 -ftracer"

Command line: gcc -O2 -ftracer -fcompare-debug -c testcase.c or gcc -O1 -ftree-pre -freorder-blocks -ftracer -fcompare-debug -c testcase.c Tested revisions: r155833 - crash r155777 - crash r154830 - crash r153685 - crash Output: $ /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-155777-lto/bin/gcc -O2 -ftracer -fcompar

[Bug rtl-optimization/42691] problematic REG_EQUAL note added to SUBREG

--- Comment #5 from jingyu at google dot com 2010-01-12 22:21 --- Subject: Re: problematic REG_EQUAL note added to SUBREG On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:57 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-12 08:57

[Bug c++/40239] Aggregate initialization requires copy constructor

--- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 21:52 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I will stop adding the 'Contributed by' line from now, and will remove > it from this patch. If you want, I can remove it from all the test cases > I did commit. I don't think that's necessary,

[Bug c++/40239] Aggregate initialization requires copy constructor

--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2010-01-12 21:49 --- Subject: Re: Aggregate initialization requires copy constructor Le mar. 12 janv. 2010 à 20:58:01 (-), bangerth at gmail dot com a écrit: > As a matter of etiquette (I think we've had > this conversation with others

[Bug middle-end/42718] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42559.c at -O1 and above

Executing on host: /mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ -O1 -w -c -o pr42559.o /mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr425 59.c(timeout = 300) /mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42559.c: In function 'jum pfunc': /mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/tes

[Bug lto/42665] Internal compiler exception in with gfortran when using -fwhole-program -flto -fopenmp

--- Comment #12 from jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com 2010-01-12 21:14 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Subject: Re: Internal compiler exception in with gfortran > when using -fwhole-program -flto -fopenmp > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com wrote: > > > > > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/42703] [4.5 Regression] ICE in generate_subtree_copies with out of bounds array access

--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 21:05 --- I would say that the dd.c[4] access into an array that is four chars long has undefined behavior. It is also the reason why build_ref_for_offset cannot find a suitable array element for it, because there is none. B

[Bug c++/40239] Aggregate initialization requires copy constructor

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 20:58 --- Dodji, thanks for the patch. As a matter of etiquette (I think we've had this conversation with others in the past already): in your patch, you mark the testcase as "Contributed by Dodji Seketeli", but in fact the testcas

[Bug tree-optimization/42703] [4.5 Regression] ICE in generate_subtree_copies with out of bounds array access

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 20:48 --- This code is undefined because out of bounds access of the array. Also note the use of the union is not needed here really as char is a character type which means it can be used to access the ScmUInt64 without any a

[Bug rtl-optimization/42699] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ZERO_EXTRACT on lhs never optimized out

--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 20:25 --- Subject: Bug 42699 Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 12 20:25:10 2010 New Revision: 155844 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155844 Log: PR rtl-optimization/42699 * cse.c (cse_insn): Opt

[Bug c++/42336] [4.5 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function argument in template function

--- Comment #18 from jason at redhat dot com 2010-01-12 19:45 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function argument in template function On 01/10/2010 06:42 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > In general I am not sure plan of doing all > datastructure/

[Bug fortran/42664] ICE on compilation of polyhedron benchmarks with -mfma4

--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 19:04 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok to check in? No, please follow usual procedure for submitting patches and post the patch to gcc-patches@ first. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664

[Bug tree-optimization/42685] [4.5 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O1 -funroll-loops" (2)

--- Comment #3 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-01-12 18:08 --- Created an attachment (id=19566) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19566&action=view) different reduced testcase I don't know if it's the same problem, but fails with the same flags. $ gcc -O1 -fcompare-

[Bug libstdc++/24803] [c++0x] reference_wrapper and pointers to member functions

--- Comment #22 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 18:07 --- Interesting... lately people (*) are apparently happy with all sorts of regressions wrt C++98/TR1... Anyway, then let's close it, actually I leave to you the choice between fixed, wontfix and invalid ;) (*)

[Bug c/42717] New: ice: verify_ssa failed

posix gcc version 4.5.0 20100112 (experimental) (GCC) reg...@john-home:~/volatile/bugs/tmp253$ cat small.c static signed char foo (signed char si1, unsigned char si2) { return (si1 ^ si2) & (-si2 ^ si2) ? : si1 - si2; } struct S0 { }; unsigned char g_21; struct S0 g_34; void bar (uns

[Bug c/42716] New: ICE in extract_range_from_assert, at tree-vrp.c:1423

f=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/tmp/gcc-r155838-install --program-prefix=r155838- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.5.0 20100112 (experimental) (GCC) reg...@john-home:~/volatile/bugs/tmp252$ cat small.c static short foo (long long si1, short si2) { retu

[Bug libstdc++/42712] search_n/iterator.cc times out in parallel-mode

--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 18:00 --- My impression is that for some reason it's just slow, very slow: with TEST_DEPTH=10 it completes in a decent amount of time... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42712

[Bug libstdc++/42624] libstdc++ parallel mode deadlocks in barrier

--- Comment #13 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 17:54 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thread 1 waits for its colleagues, but where are they gone? Is it possible > that an exception is thrown inside find (by means of the value type or the > predicate)? > I don't fully trust g

[Bug libstdc++/42712] search_n/iterator.cc times out in parallel-mode

--- Comment #1 from singler at kit dot edu 2010-01-12 17:43 --- Maybe rather an endless loop. -- singler at kit dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|un

[Bug libstdc++/42624] libstdc++ parallel mode deadlocks in barrier

--- Comment #12 from singler at kit dot edu 2010-01-12 17:42 --- Thread 1 waits for its colleagues, but where are they gone? Is it possible that an exception is thrown inside find (by means of the value type or the predicate)? I don't fully trust gdb in this case, but it shows that an i

[Bug libstdc++/24803] [c++0x] reference_wrapper and pointers to member functions

--- Comment #21 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 17:19 --- (In reply to comment #20) > I'd like only to make sure we don't > forget about the issue with pointers to member functions: is there a DR open > already? It's been raised on the lib reflector byme, Stephan T. L

[Bug libgcj/40859] [4.4 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

--- Comment #3 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 17:14 --- Subject: Bug 40859 Author: doko Date: Tue Jan 12 17:14:15 2010 New Revision: 155840 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155840 Log: 2010-01-12 Matthias Klose PR libjava/40859, backported

[Bug other/42715] [4.5 Regression] output_operand: invalid expression as operand

--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 17:07 --- Created an attachment (id=19565) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19565&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42715

[Bug other/42715] New: [4.5 Regression] output_operand: invalid expression as operand

seen with 20100107 on x86_64-linux-gnu with a biarch compiler: works without -fPIC or with -O1 $ gcc -m32 -c -g -O2 -fPIC stabs.i ../../../dlls/dbghelp/stabs.c:1533:1: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source

[Bug debug/41371] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking is slow and memory hungry

--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 17:00 --- Created an attachment (id=19564) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19564&action=view) gcc45-pr41371.patch Patch that speeds up the qmc2main.ii testcase to bearable compile time (2m20s on my box with

[Bug tree-optimization/42707] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in mark_operand_necessary

--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:50 --- configured with --enable-checking=release -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42707

[Bug tree-optimization/42714] [4.5 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:504

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:48 --- Created an attachment (id=19563) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19563&action=view) testcase Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42714

[Bug other/42713] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in tsubst

--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19562) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19562&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42713

[Bug tree-optimization/42714] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:504

early IPA SRA runs into > ./cc1plus -quiet x_20.ii -O2 /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kdebindings-4.3.90/build/smoke/qt/x_20.cpp: In function '__smokeqt::x_QXmlStreamAttributes::x_QXmlStreamAttributes(QVectorData**)': /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kdebindings-4.3.90/build/smoke/qt/x_20.cpp:2974:62: internal co

[Bug other/42713] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in tsubst

seen with trunk 20100112: $ g++ -c ../DemonsRegistration.ii In file included from /scratch/packages/tmp/rebuild/slicer-3.4.0~svn10438/Applications/CLI/DiffeomorphicDemonsRegistration/itkGridForwardWarpImageFilter.h:120:0, from /scratch/packages/tmp/rebuild/slicer-3.4.0~svn10438

[Bug tree-optimization/42704] [4.5 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa after early SRA

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:43 --- *** Bug 42707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/42707] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in mark_operand_necessary

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:43 --- Looks like PR42704 which is what I reproduce with the testcase in this bug as well. I guess you built 4.5 w/o checking. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42704 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug debug/42710] [4.5 Regression] ICE in first_imm_use_stmt, at tree-flow-inline.h:1081

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:40 --- Seems to work on current trunk (fixed between revs 155679 (failing) and 155834 (ok)). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710

[Bug debug/42710] [4.5 Regression] ICE in first_imm_use_stmt, at tree-flow-inline.h:1081

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:38 --- Created an attachment (id=19561) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19561&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710

[Bug libstdc++/42712] New: search_n/iterator.cc times out in parallel-mode

I'm consistently seeing this time out when regtesting make check-parallel. Is it unavoidable withing the current infrastructure? Besides slowing down the testing itself (not a very big issue, momentarily, I will commit an hack for this), seems a quite puzzling behavior to me: if parallel-mode runs

[Bug debug/42710] [4.5 Regression] ICE in first_imm_use_stmt, at tree-flow-inline.h:1081

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:30 --- Also works without -g. Reducing. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

--- Comment #2 from espindola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:29 --- Is the undefined reference to libgcc? Is it being linked statically? When linking libgcc statically the driver has to pass -plugin-opt=-pass-through=/foo/bar/libgcc.a to ld. This is done in gcc.c: %{static|st

[Bug fortran/42664] ICE on compilation of polyhedron benchmarks with -mfma4

--- Comment #7 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-12 16:26 --- Ok to check in? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664

[Bug fortran/42664] ICE on compilation of polyhedron benchmarks with -mfma4

--- Comment #6 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-12 16:24 --- Bootstrap and target tests pass with the new patch. Compilation of all polyhedron benchmarks also passes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664

[Bug c/11751] wrong evaluation order of an expression

--- Comment #86 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-01-12 16:24 --- *** Bug 42711 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/42711] the increment(++) or decrement(--) operators is wrong for short index of array

--- Comment #2 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-01-12 16:24 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11751 *** -- schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug other/42710] [4.5 Regression] ICE in first_imm_use_stmt, at tree-flow-inline.h:1081

--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 16:24 --- Created an attachment (id=19560) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19560&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710

[Bug c++/42569] [4.5 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list at cp/parser.c

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:23 --- Confirmed for the unreduced testcase. > ./cc1plus -quiet gstagev2mux.ii -fpermissive gstapev2mux.cc: In function 'void add_one_tag(const GstTagList*, const gchar*, void*)': gstapev2mux.cc:118:62: warning: cannot ca

[Bug c/42711] the increment(++) or decrement(--) operators is wrong for short index of array

--- Comment #1 from aonebeam at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 16:14 --- Created an attachment (id=19559) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19559&action=view) The source of wrong result of decrement, increment is the same The result is wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug tree-optimization/42709] [4.5 Regression] error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:12 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/42709] [4.5 Regression] error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:11 --- Created an attachment (id=19558) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19558&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42709

[Bug c/42711] New: the increment(++) or decrement(--) operators is wrong for short index of array

The following tests are made on solaris 5.10 platform. This is the example of the decrement(--) for short index of array: /*/ #include int main() { int aryHuowq[3] = {0}; short

[Bug other/42710] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in first_imm_use_stmt, at tree-flow-inline.h:1081

seen with trunk 20100107: build succeeds with either -O2, or without the -ffast-math $ g++ -c -g -O3 -ffast-math dcraw.ii dcraw.cc: In member function 'void DCRaw::convert_to_rgb()': dcraw.cc:8096:6: internal compiler error: in first_imm_use_stmt, at tree-flow-inline.h:1081 Please submit a full

[Bug c/42708] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:08 --- typedef long unsigned int size_t; extern char *yytext; typedef union YYSTYPE { char *id; } YYSTYPE; extern YYSTYPE yylval; void yylex (int b) { yylval = (YYSTYPE) (b ? 0 : (char *) malloc (4)); } #1 0x0

[Bug tree-optimization/42709] [4.5 Regression] error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:59 --- Created an attachment (id=19557) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19557&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42709

[Bug tree-optimization/42709] New: [4.5 Regression] error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression

> ./cc1 -quiet -O3 YUY2.i YUY2.c: In function 'dv_mb411_right_YUY2': YUY2.c:172:1: error: type mismatch in pointer plus expression dv_coeff_t * dv_coeff_t * dv_coeff_t * vect_var_.422_459 = vect_cst_.423_156 + vect_cst_.424_119; YUY2.c:172:1: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed Please

[Bug tree-optimization/42706] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:1634, (IPA SRA)

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:55 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/42706] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:1634, (IPA SRA)

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:54 --- Created an attachment (id=19556) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19556&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42706

[Bug middle-end/42708] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993

--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 15:53 --- Created an attachment (id=19555) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19555&action=view) preprocessed source another failure, independent of -O[0-2] -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42708

[Bug libstdc++/42679] RTLD_DEEPBIND dlopen option for shared library that uses libstdc++ std::ostream crashes

-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42679

[Bug middle-end/42708] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:46 --- Created an attachment (id=19554) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19554&action=view) testcase reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42708

[Bug middle-end/42708] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993

> ./cc1 -quiet -O0 parser_lex.i parser_lex.l: In function 'yylex': parser_lex.l:185:183: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6993 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. -- Sum

[Bug tree-optimization/42707] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in mark_operand_necessary

--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 15:43 --- Created an attachment (id=19553) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19553&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42707

[Bug tree-optimization/42707] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in mark_operand_necessary

seen with trunk 20100112, not with the 4.4 branch; lowering optimization to -O1 works around the segfault. $ g++ -c -g -O2 nsTreeRows.ii /scratch/packages/tmp/rebuild/kompozer-0.8~b1/mozilla/content/xul/templates/src/nsTreeRows.cpp: In member function 'void nsTreeRows::InvalidateCach

[Bug tree-optimization/42705] [4.5 Regression] verify_flow_info failed with -O

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:42 --- typedef int GLint; typedef unsigned char GLubyte; typedef unsigned int uint32_t; struct radeon_bo { void *ptr; uint32_t flags; }; struct radeon_renderbuffer { struct radeon_bo *bo; unsigned int cpp;

[Bug tree-optimization/42706] [4,.5 Regression] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:1634, (IPA SRA)

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:28 --- Created an attachment (id=19552) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19552&action=view) testcase Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42706

[Bug tree-optimization/42706] New: [4,.5 Regression] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:1634, (IPA SRA)

> ./cc1 -quiet Net.i -O2 -w Net.c: In function 'check_netstat': Net.c:765:1: internal compiler error: in gimple_op, at gimple.h:1634 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. -- Summary: [4,.5 Regress

[Bug tree-optimization/42652] vectorizer created unaligned vector insns

--- Comment #9 from law at redhat dot com 2010-01-12 15:18 --- Subject: Re: vectorizer created unaligned vector insns On 01/12/10 01:08, irar at il dot ibm dot com wrote: > --- Comment #8 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2010-01-12 08:08 --- > So, to be on the safe side, we sh

[Bug tree-optimization/42705] [4.5 Regression] verify_flow_info failed with -O

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:15 --- Created an attachment (id=19551) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19551&action=view) testcase Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42705

[Bug tree-optimization/42705] New: [4.5 Regression] verify_flow_info failed with -O

> ./cc1 -quiet radeon_span.i -O radeon_span.c: In function 'r600_ptr_color': radeon_span.c:228:17: error: label in the middle of basic block 9radeon_span.c:228:17: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See

[Bug tree-optimization/42704] [4.5 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa after early SRA

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:53 --- > ./cc1plus -quiet nsTreeRows.3.ii -O2 -w nsTreeRows.3.ii: In member function 'void nsTreeRows::InvalidateCachedRow()': nsTreeRows.3.ii:39:1: error: missing definition for SSA_NAME: D.2215_9 in statement: # .MEM_16 =

[Bug tree-optimization/42703] [4.5 Regression] ICE in generate_subtree_copies, at tree-sra.c:2003

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:38 --- __extension__ typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t; typedef uint64_t ScmUInt64; void swapb64(ScmUInt64 *loc) { union { ScmUInt64 l; unsigned char c[4]; } dd; unsigned char t; dd.l

[Bug tree-optimization/42704] [4.5 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa after early SRA

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:37 --- Reducing. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/42704] [4.5 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa after early SRA

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:36 --- Created an attachment (id=19550) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19550&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42704

[Bug tree-optimization/42704] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa after early SRA

> ./cc1plus -quiet nsTreeRows.ii -O2 /usr/src/packages/BUILD/mozilla/content/xul/templates/src/nsTreeRows.cpp: In member function 'void nsTreeRows::InvalidateCachedRow()': /usr/src/packages/BUILD/mozilla/content/xul/templates/src/nsTreeRows.cpp:483:1: error: missing definition for SSA_NAME: D.14766

[Bug libstdc++/42624] libstdc++ parallel mode deadlocks in barrier

--- Comment #11 from singler at kit dot edu 2010-01-12 14:35 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Could this bug be related to this one: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36242#c4 This bug is invalid for GCC 4.4. > Clamd creates threads using pthread_create, std::find is called f

[Bug libstdc++/42624] libstdc++ parallel mode deadlocks in barrier

--- Comment #10 from singler at kit dot edu 2010-01-12 14:35 --- Can reproduce deadlock now. -- singler at kit dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|una

[Bug libgcj/40859] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 14:33 --- this is fixed on the trunk, preparing a backport to the branch -- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfi

[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:30 --- Created an attachment (id=19549) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19549&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701

[Bug tree-optimization/42703] [4.5 Regression] ICE in generate_subtree_copies, at tree-sra.c:2003

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:13 --- Reducing. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/42703] [4.5 Regression] ICE in generate_subtree_copies, at tree-sra.c:2003

--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-12 13:58 --- Created an attachment (id=19548) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19548&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703

[Bug tree-optimization/42703] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in generate_subtree_copies, at tree-sra.c:2003

seen with trunk 20100107, not with the 4.4 branch. lowering optimization to -O0 lets the build succeed. $ gcc -c -O1 uvector.i uvector.c: In function 'swapb64': uvector.c:10935:1: internal compiler error: in generate_subtree_copies, at tree-sra.c:2003 Please submit a full bug report, with preproc

  1   2   >