------- Comment #22 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 18:07 ------- Interesting... lately people (*) are apparently happy with all sorts of regressions wrt C++98/TR1...
Anyway, then let's close it, actually I leave to you the choice between fixed, wontfix and invalid ;) (*) Stephan at least is also happy with std::vector & co not explicitly instantiable anymore for non-DefaultConstructible types: if I remember all the time I spent with Matt Austern encouragement to tweak all our containers for that... Agreed, the new philosophy of adding requirements to the specific members allows more flexibility together with non-moveable types, etc, but in my opinion it really makes sense only together with Concepts where you can elegantly make a member "disappear" depending on a Require clause... bah... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803
