------- Comment #21 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 17:19 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > I'd like only to make sure we don't > forget about the issue with pointers to member functions: is there a DR open > already?
It's been raised on the lib reflector byme, Stephan T. Lavavej and Alisdair Meredith. I'm not sufficiently motivated to open an issue for it, there are workarounds using mem_fn. The proposed resolution for LWG 1225 reinforces my interpretation that result_of does not support pointers-to-members. > Maybe we could also find a way to mention it in the code, if you > haven't done that already, didn't check. No, I didn't mention it in the code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803
