[Bug target/21277] Runtime error with C++ shared library and --disable-shared

--- Additional Comments From info at yourkit dot com 2005-05-02 06:59 --- First of all, thank you all for the suggestions. > libstdc++'s configure contains the docs for --with-pic: I'm sorry, I'm not a gcc configuration guru :), and all that I was doing was building gcc via its configu

[Bug tree-optimization/21304] [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file from kdebindings

--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-02 05:57 --- with CFLAGS=-O2 on ppc and --disable-checking: ==> 344.log <== 268.28user 0.82system 4:29.15elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+104891minor)pagefaults 0swaps ==> 401.log <== 9658.50

[Bug c++/15877] [3.4/4.0 Regression] valid code using templates and anonymous enums is rejected

--- Additional Comments From llib at computer dot org 2005-05-02 05:46 --- the following code is fairly similar to this bug, but it is rejected by g++ 4.0.0: x.cc:10: error: '(Arg1 + 1)' is not a valid template argument for type 'int' because it is a non-constant expression x.cc:10: err

[Bug tree-optimization/21304] [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file from kdebindings

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-02 05:14 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file from kdebindings On May 1, 2005, at 11:33 PM, belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru wrote: > (though profile says mo

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21304] [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file from kdebindings

On May 1, 2005, at 11:33 PM, belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru wrote: (though profile says most of time spent in SSA verifier): Did you forget to configure with --disable-checking :). -- Pinski

[Bug c++/18886] misleading warning from attribute sentinel in C++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 05:09 --- For 4.0.1. -- What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.1 Regression] misleading |misleading

[Bug c++/18886] [4.1 Regression] misleading warning from attribute sentinel in C++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 05:07 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/15017] [tree-ssa] compare (equal) with casts are not removed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 05:00 --- Oh, bool_var1 != bool_var0 should be changed to use TRUTH_XOR_EXPR also. I will look into that tomorrow. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/15017] [tree-ssa] compare (equal) with casts are not removed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 04:46 --- Example 1 in comment #0 has been fixed already. foo0 and foo1 in comment #3 is PR 15618. foo, foo2, and foo3 in comment #3 has been already fixed also. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1501

[Bug c++/19542] attribute(sentinel) has problems with C++ __null

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 04:23 --- Subject: Bug 19542 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-02 04:22:57 Modified files: gcc: c-common.c c-common.h c-opts.c c.opt

[Bug other/21328] New: bogus permissions on files in CVS

These files in CVS bogusly carry executable permissions and should be "chmod -x"'ed: gcc/ada/a-chzla1.ads gcc/ada/a-chzla9.ads gcc/ada/a-lfztio.ads gcc/ada/a-liztio.ads gcc/ada/a-llfzti.ads gcc/ada/a-llizti.ads gcc/ada/a-sfztio.ads gcc/ada/a-siztio.ads gcc/ada/a-ssizti.ads gcc/ada/a-stzbou.adb gc

[Bug tree-optimization/21304] [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file from kdebindings

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2005-05-02 03:33 --- This small testcase exhibits similar behaviour (though profile says most of time spent in SSA verifier): --- #define A0

[Bug ada/21327] New: gnat_ugn.texi invalid @direntry

# /sbin/install-info --infodir=/opt/gnu/info \ /opt/gnu/info/gnat_ugn_unw.info Produces this entry in /opt/gnu/info/dir GNU Ada tools * GNAT User's Guide (gnat_ugn_unw) install-info --delete is not able to handle this: # /sbin/install-info --delete --infodir=/opt/gnu/info \ /opt/gnu/info/gna

[Bug libgcj/21326] seg fault in _Jv_Linker

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|_Jv_Linker

[Bug libgcj/21326] New: _Jv_Linker

gcc configured with:--prefix=/proj/install --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-clocale=gnu --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-nls --with-system-zlib Operating System: Fedora Core 3 This is *not* the gcj that is installed with FC3, I compiled it separately. The libgcj is *not* the on

[Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 01:55 --- Working on a fix. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm2

[Bug target/21314] C++ size and performance regression with -Os

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|C++ performance regression |C++ size and performance |with -Os|regression with -Os http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug target/21314] C++ performance regression with -Os

--- Additional Comments From deemkay at gmail dot com 2005-05-02 01:17 --- dirtyepic ~/work $ ~/gcc-4.0-20050430/bin/g++ -O0 -Wall -march=pentium3 cpptest.cpp -o new-pr21314-O0 dirtyepic ~/work $ ~/gcc-4.0-20050430/bin/g++ -O1 -Wall -march=pentium3 cpptest.cpp -o new-pr21314-O1 dirtyepic

[Bug rtl-optimization/16052] strength reduction produces wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 00:54 --- Fixed for 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESO

[Bug tree-optimization/14797] [tree-ssa] propagate constants back to PHI

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 00:50 --- Fixed via PRE for 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/21040] [3.3 regression] Segmentation fault on template/typedef typo

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 00:43 --- Closing as will not fix. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/21325] [4.0 Regression] libjava should be re-enabled for ppc-darwin

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 00:39 --- If I have time I will test the obvious patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCO

[Bug target/21325] [4.0 Regression] libjava should be re-enabled for ppc-darwin

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21325

[Bug target/21325] New: [4.0 Regression] libjava should be re-enabled for ppc-darwin

Libjava should no longer fail to build on powerpc-darwin and really should be re-enabled. -- Summary: [4.0 Regression] libjava should be re-enabled for ppc- darwin Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/19570] cross compiler for power PC -O2 optimization moves code outside of use

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 00:34 --- No feedback in 3 months. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/8909] sparc-openbsd does not define TEXT_SECTION_ASM_OP or DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP so an error in varasm.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 00:32 --- Suspending as this target is Obsoleted. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/16613] [3.4/4.0 Regression] compile time regression, when adding cerr usage

--- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-05-01 23:42 --- i have run my compile time test again, here are the timings and something has gone worse after 2005/03/26 > g++-4.0-20050326 -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configure

[Bug c++/18464] [3.4 regression] error message about "non-lvalue in unary '&'" when using ?: operator

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 23:29 --- Fixed in GCC 3.4.4. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|

[Bug c++/18464] [3.4 regression] error message about "non-lvalue in unary '&'" when using ?: operator

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 23:26 --- Subject: Bug 18464 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-01 23:26:26 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug target/21323] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 23:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) > 4.1.0 was bootstrapping properly using the 20050409 experimental so this is a > relatively recent bug. Or a latent bug which showed up. -- What|Removed

[Bug target/21323] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From matt at 3am-software dot com 2005-05-01 23:05 --- 4.1.0 was bootstrapping properly using the 20050409 experimental so this is a relatively recent bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21323

[Bug middle-end/21318] [4.1 Regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 22:56 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot

[Bug libfortran/21324] New: #undef GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY causes testsuite failures

It would be better for performance if allocated memory wouldn't need to be cleared. Doing this for array temporaries can cost a lot. Not #defining GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY in memory.c leads to failures, however: Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file f

[Bug c++/14391] -fno-weak vs. __GXX_WEAK__

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 22:21 --- Subject: Bug 14391 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-01 22:21:00 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog Log message: 2005

[Bug target/21323] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From matt at 3am-software dot com 2005-05-01 22:18 --- Created an attachment (id=8786) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8786&action=view) precompile source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21323

[Bug target/21323] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

GCC 4.1 segfaults using the compiler produce by stage1/gcc: Reading specs from ./specs Target: alpha--netbsd Configured with: /u1/toolchain/gcc/configure --target=alpha--netbsd --build=alpha--netbsd --host=alpha--netbsd --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --enable-languages=c,c++,objc Thread

[Bug c++/14391] -fno-weak vs. __GXX_WEAK__

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 20:35 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed, this patch should work (could you sumbit if it works for you?): Looks like I had messed up the logic and the !flag_weak should have been just flag_weak. Anyways this ha

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From fastsnip-bcard1 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-01 20:30 --- Subject: Re: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output On Sunday 01 May 2005 16:25, you wrote: > --- Additional Comments From fastsnip-bcard1 at yahoo dot com > 2005

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From fastsnip-bcard1 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-01 20:24 --- Subject: Re: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output On Sunday 01 May 2005 15:40, you wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From fastsnip-bcard1 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-01 20:05 --- Subject: Re: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output On Sunday 01 May 2005 15:13, you wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From fastsnip-bcard1 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-01 20:03 --- Subject: Re: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output On Sunday 01 May 2005 15:19, you wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-

[Bug ada/21317] ACATS c954025 c954026 failures

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-05-01 19:55 --- No FAIL on 4.0.1 20050430 (prerelease) x86_64-linux: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg00049.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21317

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 19:40 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect > debug output > > On Sunday 01 May 2005 15:19, you wrote: > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From fastsnip-bcard1 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-01 19:34 --- Subject: Re: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output On Sunday 01 May 2005 15:19, you wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-

[Bug libstdc++/21286] [4.0/4.1 Regression] filebuf::xsgetn vs pipes

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-01 19:28 --- OK, thanks. Maybe you cannot see the problem by just reverting the patch, because at least part of the data remained in the cache: I found your procedure very useful to expose the problem but very sensitive to that

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 19:28 --- The other thing to try is add -fmudflap -lmudflap and compile at -O0 to see if you run over a bounds. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21322

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From fastsnip-gcc at yahoo dot com 2005-05-01 19:21 --- Created an attachment (id=8785) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8785&action=view) compiler output from "-save-temps" option -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21322

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 19:19 --- Also can you look to see you have any warnings with -W -Wall? The warnings about unsigned vs signed were there before just enabled with -pedantic. Also does -fno-strict-aliasing help if so this might not b

[Bug c/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 19:13 --- What version of gdb? Read : GCC now generates location lists by default when compiling with debug info and optimization. GDB 6.0 and older crashes when it sees loc

[Bug libstdc++/21286] [4.0/4.1 Regression] filebuf::xsgetn vs pipes

--- Additional Comments From ralfixx at gmx dot de 2005-05-01 19:12 --- > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/ Just tried gcc-4.0-20050430: the problem is gone. However, I could not reintroduce the problem by just reverting the patch for fstream.cc (still works after I undo the patch),

[Bug c/21322] New: O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

I have reviewed the gcc web page for reporting bugs and this situation is not covered. I have a program that I have been compiling with the gcc 2.9 and 3.4 series. In the past week I upgraded to gcc 4.0.0 I compiled the program and corrected the warning message about using "unsigned char *" wh

[Bug tree-optimization/15618] Missed bool optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 19:00 --- Oh, this now longer will help the C++ front-end as we have "#define bool char". I really hate that, we should not do it but we do :(. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618

[Bug target/20633] [4.0 only] libgcc2.c:1623: error: size of array 'compile_type_assert' is negative

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:59 --- Subject: Bug 20633 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-01 18:59:28 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug fortran/21303] "Positive width required in format string"

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:48 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Neither NAG's compiler nor g77 compile this program. > The behavior of IFC is an extension. Then lets call this an enhancement but note it blocks compiling OrbFit which works on

[Bug fortran/21302] Max line length in free form mode

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:47 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I suppose we could implement a -fline-length=N type option. Then lets call this an enhancement but note it blocks compiling OrbFit which works on XLF, Intel's and others. --

[Bug tree-optimization/14442] [tree-ssa] missed sib if conversion optimization on the tree level

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:44 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Actually PHI-OPT needs to improved after the patch for PR 15618 is applied, > instead of creating one > statement at a time and then letting the passes after wards fold it (which

[Bug tree-optimization/14442] [tree-ssa] missed sib if conversion optimization on the tree level

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:26 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Basically PR 17671 is the PR for the new PHI-OPT and PR 15618 is for fold > a!=0 to a when a is of the > boolean_type. Also note the C++ front-end for the code in comment 3 (whe

[Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:25 --- With the patch for PR 15618 applied, f2 is fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

[Bug fortran/21303] "Positive width required in format string"

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:15 --- Neither NAG's compiler nor g77 compile this program. The behavior of IFC is an extension. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21303

[Bug libstdc++/21286] [4.0/4.1 Regression] filebuf::xsgetn vs pipes

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-01 18:12 --- You can find weekly snapshots both of mainline and 4_0 here: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21286

[Bug target/20633] [4.0 only] libgcc2.c:1623: error: size of array 'compile_type_assert' is negative

--- Additional Comments From gerald at pfeifer dot com 2005-05-01 18:12 --- Applied to 4.0 branch as well. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/20633] [4.0 only] libgcc2.c:1623: error: size of array 'compile_type_assert' is negative

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:11 --- Subject: Bug 20633 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-01 18:10:49 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/21314] C++ performance regression with -Os

--- Additional Comments From deemkay at gmail dot com 2005-05-01 18:08 --- hmm. code size is actually bigger with -Os. -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 15689 May 1 12:02 pr21314-O0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 8333 May 1 12:02 pr21314-O1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 8405 May 1 1

[Bug fortran/21302] Max line length in free form mode

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 18:05 --- (In reply to comment #0) > We get an error (and a warning with -Wline-truncation) but I don't think > free form should have a line lenght limit. See 3.3.1 from the Standard. "In free source form, each source

[Bug tree-optimization/15618] Missed bool optimization

--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-05-01 17:53 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have a fix which I am testing. One change to fold_binary to fold "bool_var > != 0" to bool_var and > one to fold_widened_comparison to treat BOOLEAN_TYPE like INTEGER_TYPE. > > Th

[Bug libstdc++/21286] [4.0/4.1 Regression] filebuf::xsgetn vs pipes

--- Additional Comments From ralfixx at gmx dot de 2005-05-01 17:44 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > A note for Ralf: It is incorrect to use cin.eof() > to watch for the end of a stream. > The correct flag to check is fail(). > eof() is really meant for seeing if that's why op>> failed. Y

[Bug tree-optimization/15618] Missed bool optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 17:29 --- I have a fix which I am testing. One change to fold_binary to fold "bool_var != 0" to bool_var and one to fold_widened_comparison to treat BOOLEAN_TYPE like INTEGER_TYPE. This improves the gimplification

[Bug java/17845] can't build GNU Classpath

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 17:28 --- Fixed or at least works for me. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug java/17845] can't build GNU Classpath

--- Additional Comments From dog at bluezoo dot org 2005-05-01 17:24 --- Subject: Re: can't build GNU Classpath pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Is this true anymore, I built classpath a couple of days ago on > powerpc-darwin with a case-insensitive > file system and it worked

[Bug other/21319] Please add the feature of switching target at runtime

--- Additional Comments From radek at podgorny dot cz 2005-05-01 17:05 --- ...anyway, I'm not too educated at this, but wouldn't inlined function solve this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21319

[Bug middle-end/21318] [4.1 Regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 17:03 --- The stdarg-2.c failure is caused by the same patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21318

[Bug libstdc++/21321] [4.1 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/12790-3.cc execution test

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 16:58 --- s/add anything/add new tests/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21321

[Bug libstdc++/21321] New: [4.1 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/12790-3.cc execution test

Comparison between Thu Apr 14 13:13:02 UTC 2005 and Fri Apr 15 10:33:59 UTC 2005 ... Tests that now fail, but worked before: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/12790-3.cc execution test Coincides with edit version 1.2 of the above file, which changed stuff but didn't seem to add anything. The .log sai

[Bug middle-end/21320] possible false positives for '$foo may be used uninitialized in this function'

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Keywords||diagnostic http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug c/21320] possible false positives for '$foo may be used uninitialized in this function'

--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-01 16:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8784) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8784&action=view) /tmp/pr21320-t.i.bz2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21320

[Bug c/21320] New: possible false positives for '$foo may be used uninitialized in this function'

this testcase is taken from subversion-1.1.4 subversion/libsvn_delta/svndiff.c install_gcc40-1/libexec/gcc/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.0.1/cc1 -fpreprocessed /tmp/t.i -quiet -dumpbase t.c -auxbase-strip t -O2 -Wall -version -o t.s GNU C version 4.0.1 20050429 (prerelease) (powerpc-unknown-linux-g

[Bug other/21319] Please add the feature of switching target at runtime

--- Additional Comments From radek at podgorny dot cz 2005-05-01 16:35 --- Oh, I see. Anyway, is 1-5% a major slowdown? I think it's still a good penalty if it saves all the headaches... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21319

[Bug bootstrap/21230] [4.0/4.1 Regression] bootstrap failed unless bootstrap compiler is gcc.

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 16:33 --- Will take care of the patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/17116] Missed jump threading/bypassing optimization with loop and % (or ands)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 16:29 --- We now get: main () { int i.8; int i; : Invalid sum of outgoing probabilities 0.0% i = 0; i.8 = i + 1; Invalid sum of outgoing probabilities 98.9% :; if ((i.8 & 1) != 0) goto ; else goto ; :;

[Bug other/21319] Please add the feature of switching target at runtime

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 16:23 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Slowed down? I'm not talking about compliling ALL the stuff in, just what I > need. Like "configure --with-arch-i686 --with-arch-arm"... Yes that would slow down the compiler as r

[Bug other/21319] Please add the feature of switching target at runtime

--- Additional Comments From radek at podgorny dot cz 2005-05-01 16:13 --- Slowed down? I'm not talking about compliling ALL the stuff in, just what I need. Like "configure --with-arch-i686 --with-arch-arm"... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21319

[Bug other/21319] Please add the feature of switching target at runtime

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 16:02 --- This was a very long term goal of the hooking GCC but then it was proved that it slowed down the compiler too much. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug other/21319] New: Please add the feature of switching target at runtime

The current way of doing a cross-compile is way too complicated. One has to compile gcc itself for RUNTIME architecture which outputs TARGET arch binaries (hardcoded inside). It would be very user friendly if the user compiles gcc just once (for the current arch) and selects the desired output arch

[Bug fortran/18878] Erronous error message on vaild USE statement

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878

[Bug fortran/18878] Erronous error message on vaild USE statement

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 15:21 --- Woops must have used the wrong file to test with. -- What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug fortran/19282] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19282

[Bug fortran/19282] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 15:20 --- Woops must have used the wrong file to test with. -- What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug fortran/18283] gfortran: ICE in gfc_conv_string_parameter, trans-expr.c:1982

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18283

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

-- Bug 19276 depends on bug 18283, which changed state. Bug 18283 Summary: gfortran: ICE in gfc_conv_string_parameter, trans-expr.c:1982 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18283 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/18283] gfortran: ICE in gfc_conv_string_parameter, trans-expr.c:1982

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 15:19 --- Woops I must have used the wrong file to test with. -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug fortran/18769] gfortran: ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer with array initialization

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769

[Bug fortran/18769] gfortran: ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer with array initialization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 15:18 --- Woops I must have used the wrong file to test with. -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug fortran/19282] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer

-- Bug 19282 depends on bug 18769, which changed state. Bug 18769 Summary: gfortran: ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer with array initialization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug fortran/18689] Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-05-01 15:17 --- Subject: Re: Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine In fact, how come it is fixed in 4.0 and not in 4.1? I get the error still with yesterday's cvs for any optmis

[Bug fortran/18689] Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18689

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

-- Bug 19276 depends on bug 18689, which changed state. Bug 18689 Summary: Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18689 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug fortran/18689] Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 15:15 --- Woops, this is not fixed, I must have used the wrong file to test with. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/18689] Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-05-01 15:11 --- Subject: Re: Internal compiler error with character pointer association in module subroutine Andrew, I have taken my eye off the ball, after my most recent cock-up; when did this get fixed? I have searc

[Bug middle-end/21318] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn

The following test failures appeared on ia64-hpux (-milp32 only) between 20050429 and 20050430. Both are cc1 segmentation faults in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, which can be reproduced with a cross-compiler cc1. 0x08330cf4 in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn (insn=0x401b51b8) at ../../g

[Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90

--- Additional Comments From ert at roe dot ac dot uk 2005-05-01 14:44 --- Subject: New: Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90 I get the same error compiling gcc-4.0.0 on an Opteron with Debian-3 (32-bit, glibc-2.2.5, 2.4.26 kernel) The failure occurs

  1   2   >