[Bug fortran/17927] Math error in simple divide operation

--- Additional Comments From anlauf at hep dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2004-10-12 06:55 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Re: Math error in simple divide operation > > I suppose then that a warning would be good when mixing precisions in > assignments. With Fortran 77, the great fre

[Bug c++/17413] [3.4/4.0 regression] local classes as template argument

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 06:46 --- The bug here is that we are checking complain at all. SFINAE does not say that when given a set of overload candidates you perform type deduction and then discard any candiates for which an any error occur

[Bug c++/17287] Different class layout generated by g++ 3.3, 3.4 and 4.0.

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 05:54 --- G++ 3.3 used a slightly different C++ ABI from G++ 3.4 and G++ 3.5 (which has now been renamed G++ 4.0). You can get the 3.3 C++ ABI in G++ 3.4/4.0 by using -fabi-version=1. So, that explains the 3.3 vs.

[Bug fortran/17927] Math error in simple divide operation

--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2004-10-12 04:57 --- Subject: Re: Math error in simple divide operation On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 09:00, tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 16:00 > --- >

[Bug SWING/17362] Scrollbars in JScrollPane appear only if the Container containing JScrollPane is revalidated

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:13 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug SWING/17360] JScrollPane has incorrect size when JList with specified size is added to it

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:13 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug SWING/16540] GlassPane intercepting of MouseEvents flaky.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:13 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15919] Compiler enters infinite loop on illegal program

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:10 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15917] Bug box in Gigi, code=103, on legal program

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:07 --- Confirmed on the mainline: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: | | in gnat_to_gnu_entity,

[Bug ada/15916] Illegal program not detected, RM 12.4(7)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15916

[Bug ada/15915] Illegal program not detected, RM 13.11(15)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15915

[Bug ada/15851] pragma Volatile not respected for variables with default value

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15851

[Bug ada/15847] Legal program rejected, RM 3.10.2(32)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15847

[Bug ada/15846] Illegal program not detected, self renames

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15846

[Bug ada/15845] Illegal program not detected, circular renames

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845

[Bug ada/15844] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.3(8)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15844

[Bug ada/15843] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7.2(2)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15843

[Bug ada/15842] Legal program rejected

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15842

[Bug ada/15841] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9(17)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15841

[Bug ada/15840] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7(14)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15840

[Bug ada/15833] Gigi abort Code=401 with Unchecked_Union in private part

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15833

[Bug ada/15808] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.3(10)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15808

[Bug ada/15807] Legal program runs incorrectly, RM 3.10.2(3,29)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15807

[Bug ada/15806] Bug box at expr.c:6764 on legal program

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:02 --- Confirmed on the mainline: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: | | in gimplify_expr, at /g

[Bug ada/15805] Illegal program not detected, allows writing through access to constant

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15805

[Bug ada/15804] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.8.1(2)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15804

[Bug ada/15803] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.3(19)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15803

[Bug ada/15802] Bug box at expr.c:6764 on legal program

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:59 --- Confirmed on the mainline with a different error: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: | |

[Bug ada/15800] Bug box, Storage_Error at system.ads:150:5 on legal program

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:57 --- Confirmed on the mainline: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) Bus error | | Error detected at test_

[Bug ada/15799] Legal program rejected, using 'Base

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15799

[Bug ada/15798] Bug box in Gigi, code=201, on legal program with tasking

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:56 --- Confirmed, a different error on the mainline: gimplification failed: test_246185__t unit size align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 fields unsigned nonaddressable SI file test

[Bug ada/15612] Bug box in Gigi, code=103, on illegal program

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:54 --- Fixed on the mainline: test_244945.ads:5:19: premature usage of incomplete private type "T" defined at line 2 -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/15608] Bug box at sem_ch3.adb:8228

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:52 --- Confirmed on the mainline: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) Assert_Failure sem_ch3.adb:8760| | Error

[Bug ada/15305] Bug box in Gigi, code=505

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:50 --- Confirmed on the mainline: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: | | in build_binary_op, at

[Bug ada/17160] Assert_Failure einfo.adb:1359

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:46 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/16525] 3.3.4 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure einfo.adb:435

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:39 --- Confirmed on the mainline: +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) Assert_Failure einfo.adb:458| | Error det

[Bug c++/15786] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Bad error message for frequently occuring error.

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:17 --- Fixed in GCC 3.4.3. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|

[Bug c++/15786] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Bad error message for frequently occuring error.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:07 --- Subject: Bug 15786 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 03:07:16 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug middle-end/15876] [lno] ICE, segfault in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9024

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:07 --- Subject: Bug 15876 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 03:07:16 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug middle-end/15876] [lno] ICE, segfault in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9024

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:52 --- Subject: Bug 15876 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 01:52:20 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c gcc/tests

[Bug c++/15786] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Bad error message for frequently occuring error.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:52 --- Subject: Bug 15786 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 01:52:20 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c gcc/tests

[Bug other/16519] -pthreads and -threads undocumented

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:28 --- confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug other/15548] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build

--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:18 --- My CVS patch was accepted and installed into the master CVS sources. We can patch the local cvs on gcc.gnu.org if necessary, but I don't see any real need for that, given that gcc/fixinc is now gone. There

[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:10 --- Subject: Bug 17937 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 01:10:39 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog acconfig.h acinclude.m4 con

[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2004-10-12 00:30 --- Subject: Re: Critical ~__pool troubles >Ok, but as long as we don't use that, let's avoid taking the lock a second >time in _M_reserve_block, the new calls and so on... I propose to protect >with macros or #if 0 o

[Bug c++/15786] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Bad error message for frequently occuring error.

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-10-11 23:50 --- > It would be list ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe > issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI > improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the

[Bug tree-optimization/17656] [4.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in replace_immediate_uses, at tree-ssa.c:1041

--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-10-11 23:45 --- Not a big fan of Andrew's patch. I don't think it will cover all the cases where we have a problem. Basically, afaict, we're folding the toplevel call into something else. In this case a builtin_memcpy to the des

[Bug other/17361] [3.3/3.4 Regression] gcc driver complains about C++ options when assembling

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 23:02 --- Fixed on the mainline (yes this will be fixed other places too). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/17361] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] gcc driver complains about C++ options when assembling

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:57 --- Subject: Bug 17361 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 22:57:55 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-opts.c Log message:

[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:52 --- Mine. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/17522] ICE with -tree-vectorize

-- Bug 17522 depends on bug 17936, which changed state. Bug 17936 Summary: [4.0 regression] Declaration of specialization rejected http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17936 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:51 --- It would be list ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the

[Bug c++/17936] [4.0 regression] Declaration of specialization rejected

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:51 --- Fixed in GCC 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RE

[Bug c++/17936] [4.0 regression] Declaration of specialization rejected

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:50 --- Subject: Bug 17936 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 22:50:00 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/cp : C

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:48 --- I'm not sure if this suffices, will try tomorrow: Index: primary.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/primary.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 dif

[Bug rtl-optimization/17942] segv on valid-code

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |rtl-optimization Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to fail|

[Bug c/17942] segv on valid-code

--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-10-11 22:34 --- Created an attachment (id=7328) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7328&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17942

[Bug c/17942] New: segv on valid-code

[~/rpm/BUILD/linux-2.6.9-rc4] # LANG=C gcc twofish.i -c -O2 crypto/twofish.c: In function `twofish_setkey': crypto/twofish.c:801: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault [~/rpm/BUILD/linux-2.6.9-rc4] # LANG=C gcc twofish.i -c -O # gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/pentium3-pld-lin

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double target prefixed gcjh

--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 22:18 --- Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:20 >--- >I suppose you could try this. >I made it

[Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:27 --- I'm afraid I couldn't really parse that. To me it looks like libjava_find_gij looks for "gij" in the build directory. This in turn is a shell script which, if needed, creates lt-gij. The fact that the inst

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double target prefixed gcjh

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:20 --- I suppose you could try this. I made it by looking at what other install rules are doing in this area. I'm not at all sure it is correct. Index: Make-lang.in

[Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-10-11 21:01 --- .libs/lt-gij is used by "make check". Try # grep -i gij */*.exp in libjava/testsuite. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17311

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:51 --- Confirmed, IFC accepts the code. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:49 --- I read that. What I observe is that .libs/gij is created by the build. Then if I run gij (not .libs/gij), it creates .libs/lt-gij. My understanding is that --enable-fast-install is what makes all this work

[Bug libstdc++/17922] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Spurious warnings about std::ios_base::seekdir

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:49 --- could add enum _Ios_Seekdir { _S_ios_seekdir_beg = 0, _S_ios_seekdir_cur = 1, _S_ios_seekdir_end = 2 _S_ios_seekdir_final = 1L << 16 }; This would change the value of (the currently unfortunately named) _S_i

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-11 20:47 --- Invalid, then. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVE

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11 20:37 --- Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled SOLVED On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:14:00PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Additional Comme

[Bug fortran/17941] New: gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

Hi, here's another problem, this time with "legacy f90" code: program gfcbug17 ! gfortran cannot parse this complex constant: complex, parameter :: c0 = (- 0.5, -0.5) print *, c0 end program gfcbug17 I get: In file gfcbug17.f90:3 complex, parameter :: c0 = (- 0.5, -0.5)

[Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-10-11 20:32 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02467.html I don't know how to do --disable-fast-install for gcc. --enable-fast-install is totally wrong for ELF. It should never be used for any ELF targets. -- h

[Bug libstdc++/16614] Excessive resource usage in __mt_alloc

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:26 --- Subject: Bug 16614 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 20:26:53 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/inclu

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:13 --- What version of make are you using, this works for me and a huge amount of other people. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940

[Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:13 --- I read through these patches a little. I don't understand why ltmain.sh is the way it is, but Gary's comment seemed appropriate. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02333.html Doesn't the second pa

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11 20:02 --- Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:36:22PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Additional Comments Fro

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:36 --- read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html first and provide all the needed info. We need how you configured and what target is this for. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940

[Bug bootstrap/17940] New: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

Since the introduction of version 3.4.0 I'm unable to build gcc. I've build it many times before, but with 3.40, 3.4.1, 3.4.2 it is always the same, under all possible variations regarding build directory etc.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/GCC/Install_3.4.2> make bootstrap Configuring in libiberty c

[Bug java/17848] segfault at java/class.c:2186 with PieSpy

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:28 --- But: org/jibble/socnet/Graph.java:484: confused by earlier errors, bailing out is an ICE just that with --disable-checking on, you get that message instead of a seg fault. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug java/17848] segfault at java/class.c:2186 with PieSpy

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:21 --- If I use the -I option, it works. Without the -I option, I get an error as I would expect: opsy. gcj -C org/jibble/socnet/Graph.java org/jibble/socnet/Graph.java: In class `org.jibble.socnet.Graph': org/jibb

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double target prefixed gcjh

--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 19:14 --- Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:08 >--- >Do you get a double prefix for gcj as wel

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double target prefixed gcjh

-- What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14614

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double target prefixed gcjh

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:08 --- Do you get a double prefix for gcj as well? Can you tell me how the Makefile variable program_transform_name is set in /gcc/Makefile? I suspect the problem is that GCJH_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME adds a second pref

Re: gfortran says to submit bug report

Andrew, After reading 17917, I agree. Thanks for your reply. Joe Koski on 10/11/04 11:03 AM, Andrew Pinski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Oct 11, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Joe Koski wrote: > >> backend decl for module variable > > > This is most likely the same as PR 17917. > > Thanks, > And

[Bug libgcj/14856] Update bundled zlib

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14856

[Bug other/15697] included zlib gzprintf() vulnerability

-- Bug 15697 depends on bug 14856, which changed state. Bug 14856 Summary: Update bundled zlib http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14856 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libgcj/14856] Update bundled zlib

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:47 --- zlib updated -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libgcj/14856] Update bundled zlib

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:46 --- Subject: Bug 14856 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 18:45:44 Modified files: zlib : ChangeLog FAQ INDEX Makefile.am Makef

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double target prefixed gcjh

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|Double host prefixed gcjh |Double target prefixed gcjh http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14614

[Bug bootstrap/14614] Double host prefixed gcjh

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:37 --- *** Bug 17939 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/17939] Duplicate executable installed in building cross java compiler

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:37 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14614 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/17939] Duplicate executable installed in building cross java compiler

--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 18:33 --- Subject: Re: Duplicate executable installed in building cross java compiler pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:30 >--- >Do

[Bug middle-end/16266] [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:32 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/16266] [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:32 --- Subject: Bug 16266 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 18:32:42 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog function.c Log message:

[Bug java/17939] Duplicate executable installed in building cross java compiler

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:30 --- Do you use --program-prefix at all, if so this where the bug is. Otherwise this is a target bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17939

[Bug java/17939] New: Duplicate executable installed in building cross java compiler

Configured with: --build=mingw32 --host=mingw32 --target=avr --enable-languages=c,c++,java After build and install, in the installation directory are avr-gcjh.exe avr-avr-gcjh.exe and both executables have the same file size and they both report as the gcjh program with --version. --

[Bug middle-end/17520] [4.0 regression] Huge compile time for C code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:10 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/17933] [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_insns, at /sched-rgn.c:2555

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:07 --- And here is a test which is little smaller (which generates the same problem/error): struct d { int a; }; void abort(void); typedef struct d (*f) (int i); f ff(void); void test1() { f t = ff(); t(0); }

[Bug rtl-optimization/17933] [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_insns, at /sched-rgn.c:2555

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-11 18:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_in > Here is a C example which is almost equivalent to the objective-C example: > struct d > { > int a; > }; > void abort(void); > typedef struct d

[Bug c++/17227] Default copy constructor being created although never invoked

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:57 --- *** Bug 17938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17938] cannot assign result to const reference if copy ctor is not accessible

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:57 --- Please consult http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#cxx_rvalbind. There are other reports of the same bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17227 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/17933] [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_insns, at /sched-rgn.c:2555

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:53 --- Here is a C example which is almost equivalent to the objective-C example: struct d { int a; }; void abort(void); typedef struct d (*f) (int i); f ff(void); void test1(void) { if ((ff())(0).a != 0) ab

  1   2   >