------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:20
-------
I suppose you could try this.
I made it by looking at what other install rules are
doing in this area. I'm not at all sure it is correct.
Index: Make-lang.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/java/Make-lang.in,v
retrieving revision 1.145
diff -u -r1.145 Make-lang.in
--- Make-lang.in 22 Sep 2004 11:21:21 -0000 1.145
+++ Make-lang.in 11 Oct 2004 21:17:52 -0000
@@ -207,7 +207,9 @@
rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$$tool_transformed_name$(exeext); \
$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) $$tool$(exeext)
$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$$tool_transformed_name$(exeext); \
chmod a+x $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$$tool_transformed_name$(exeext); \
- if [ $$tool = gcjh ]; then \
+ if [ -f $(GCJ)-cross$(exeext) ]; then \
+ true; \
+ elif [ $$tool = gcjh ]; then \
rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCJH_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext); \
( cd $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) && \
$(LN) $$tool_transformed_name$(exeext)
$(GCJH_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) ); \
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14614
