------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-11 22:51 -------

It would be list.... ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe
issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI
improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the testcases that
test for this to be of the type that showed this, more advanced, problem. 

I'm going to keep the infrastructure in __mt_alloc to do the actual
deallocations, however. At least, for the time being.

Sorry about this madness.

-benjamin

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-10-11 22:51:49
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17937

Reply via email to