Seongbae Park (???, ???) wrote:
...
I'm looking at it. It is either a scheduler problem,
or some other problem downstream triggered by the scheduler.
However, I'm having hard time adding fine-grained dbg_cnt to our scheduler
- do you know who might be interested in adding insn level
dbg_cnt in
On 6/14/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
> >>
> >
> > On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffas
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
> >>
> >
> > On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffast-math and FDO:
> >
> > /gcc/spec/sb-haydn-fdo-64/
On 6/13/07, Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>
>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
>>
>
> On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffast-math and FDO:
>
> /gcc/spec/sb-haydn-fdo-64/x86_64/install-2
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>
>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
>>
>
> On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffast-math and FDO:
>
> /gcc/spec/sb-haydn-fdo-64/x86_64/install-200706120559/bin/gfortran -c -o
> zscal.o
Seongbae Park (???, ???) wrote:
> On 6/12/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
>>
>> On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffast-math and FDO:
>>
>> /gcc/spec/sb-haydn-fdo-6
On 6/12/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffast-math and FDO:
/gcc/spec/sb-haydn-fdo-64/x86_64/install-200706120559/bin/gfortran -c -o
zsca
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare.
On x86_64 186.wupwise ICEs with -O2 -ffast-math and FDO:
/gcc/spec/sb-haydn-fdo-64/x86_64/install-200706120559/bin/gfortran -c -o
zscal.o-fprofile-use -O2 -ffast-math zscal.
On 12 June 2007 15:55, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 12 June 2007 15:05, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
cryp
Dave Korn wrote:
> On 12 June 2007 15:05, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>
>
>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
>>> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
>>> cryptographic algorithms (see
>>> http://www.su
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> >>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
> >>> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>
>
>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
>>> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
>>> cryptographic algorithms (see
>>> http://
On 12 June 2007 15:05, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
>> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
>> cryptographic algorithms (see
>> http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/)) - tho
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
> > on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
> > cryptographic algorithms (see
> > http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/)) -
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
> cryptographic algorithms (see
> http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/)) - those are reasonably
> small enough to investigate, bu
On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have
on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of
cryptographic algorithms (see
http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/)) - those are reasonably
small enough to investigate, but wait another day in case its ju
16 matches
Mail list logo