On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > > > > > >> Richard Guenther wrote: > >> > >>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have > >>> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of > >>> cryptographic algorithms (see > >>> http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/)) - those are reasonably > >>> small enough to investigate, but wait another day in case its just noise. > >>> > >>> Otherwise things look smooth as expected. > >>> > >>> Richard. > >>> > >>> > >> I looked at the graphs here and i do not see a regression except in the > >> compile time. > >> > > > > Note the graphs are for Throughput, so higher numbers are better. Look > > for example at Serpent or Skipjack at > > http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/botan-summary.txt-1-0.html > > (which has separate graphs for each algorithm). But as I said - just > > wait a day to see if it is noise. > > > > Richard. > > > this is a different set of graphs than you sent the first time. now i > see the regressions.
I just pointed you to the start page initially - clicking the graphs will reveal these details. Sorry for that, Richard.
