Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > > >> Richard Guenther wrote: >> >>> On ia64 SPEC2000 I see fma3d and applu now miscompare, and we have >>> on x86_64 some performance regressions with Botan (a collection of >>> cryptographic algorithms (see >>> http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/)) - those are reasonably >>> small enough to investigate, but wait another day in case its just noise. >>> >>> Otherwise things look smooth as expected. >>> >>> Richard. >>> >>> >> I looked at the graphs here and i do not see a regression except in the >> compile time. >> > > Note the graphs are for Throughput, so higher numbers are better. Look > for example at Serpent or Skipjack at > http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/botan/botan-summary.txt-1-0.html > (which has separate graphs for each algorithm). But as I said - just > wait a day to see if it is noise. > > Richard. > this is a different set of graphs than you sent the first time. now i see the regressions.
i will add this to the growing set of things to look at. kenny
