Thanks Jonathan!
Hm... why would don't add it for portability? Of course, i don't see codes with
Nested-Functions so much, but...
I think that better would delete it, or add full support?
And, it's contradicts to standart of C, nope?:)
~~~
About lambda:
Yeah is very pooowerful, of course
On 01/03/2018 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that
are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken,
they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a
syntactic sugar syntax.
GNU-C nested fun
On 4 January 2018 at 00:54, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-03 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
>> By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that
>> are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken,
>> they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just w
On 4 January 2018 at 00:44, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-03 06:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote:
>>> Why would dont add it at GNU G++?
>>
>> Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible?
>>
>
> It depends actually, lambdas are consider
On 2018-01-03 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
> By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that
> are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken,
> they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a syntactic
> sugar syntax.
>
> Aus
By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that
are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken,
they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a
syntactic sugar syntax.
Austin
On Jan 3, 2018 2:44 PM, "nick" wrote:
On 2018-01
On 2018-01-03 06:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote:
>> Why would dont add it at GNU G++?
>
> Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible?
>
It depends actually, lambdas are consider the C++ standard of this. I am
wondering what
yo
On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote:
> Why would dont add it at GNU G++?
Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible?
